Settlement of Asset

Hi Experts,
I am trying to do the settlement in CJ88, from AUC to completed asset.
When ever i am creating Completed assets in CJ02 & am going back & seeing the settlement rule the amount settlement Field is not coming other the that other options are coming.
% settkenent
Equvalance No.
Please help me in in bringing the amount field into CJ02 settlement rule]
Thanks in Advance......

An other option is to use CJIC - Line Item Apportionment then you can settle by invoice, but on the end you have to folow the advice from Blaz to ad amount settlement in config

Similar Messages

AIAB Distribution Rule for Settlement Error, "Asset cannot settle to itself"

Hello Everyone,
I have a customer who is getting the "asset cannot settle to itself" error when trying to set up a distribution rule to settle the remaining items of a Line Item Managed AUC to multiple Assets. The Asset numbers and AUC number do NOT match. Here are the steps that have been followed.
Created an Internal Order, #2000####. (1998)
Created the AuC asset. #600####(2011)
Created Settlement Rule (Sender – Internal Order, Receiver - AUC) (2011
Settle Internal Order to AUC.
Create Assets. (2014). #900###1 - #900##99 etc.
Create Settlement Rule (Sender – AUC, Receiver – Multiple Assets) This is where my customer gets the error.
They were able to settle other items from this AuC to Assets last October. It seems very strange to me that the Internal Order was created in 1998 and the AUC was created in 2011 but as I said, this was working at least last October and possibly in March of this year.
Thanks for you help.
Rick

Hello Stacy,
Sorry I didn't get back to you sooner but I just had a major implementation go live on the 2nd so I've been rather busy. I opened a ticket with SAP on this and this is what was found.
Joachim from SAP Support explained that the AUC had been settled to itself last year, that is the posting the program was throwing the error on. My assumption is that we were able to settle AUC's to themselves prior to our March upgrade. This explains the problem and we have a resolution. We are transferring AUCs that this has happened with to a new AUC and then settling the new AUC as usual.
I believe SAP fixed a bug that had previously allowed AUC's to settle to themselves in one of the updates but because this AUC had a record from the past where it settled to itself the program was validating old line items and that is why it throws the error.
Ramnik's suggestion was another option but we didn't want to change the message to a warning because we didn't want anyone to settle an asset to itself.
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Rick

Reversal of settlement from Asset to WBS

Hi Experts,
I have a question regarding reversal of settlement from AUC to asset.
I have so many line items on a WBS element, which i settled to AUC. I can see all the line items that are capitalized to AUC in CJIC screen, where i create settlement rules to settle to asset.
I have created one settlement rule for 4 line items and settled to an Asset 1. After that I have created another settlment rule for another 5 line items to settle to an asset 2 and run the settlement in CJ88 using partial capitalization, since I have some more lines left in the CJIC.
Now, when I am trying to reverse the settlement on WBS system is reversing whatever settled on asset 2 to back to AUC. I want to reverse the line items settled on Asset 1. Is it possible? If so, how can i do that? I can see all the settlements on the WBS in CJID. But, how can i reverse any settlement that is 3 to 4 months older. We are doing 4 to 5 settlements in a month
Thanks,
Satya

reversal transaction will reverse what was transacted
so you need to reverse for both asset 1 and 2 and then edefine the settlement as required after correction and then settle again

Internal Order Down Payment settle to Asset

Hi,
I have a requirement related to Down Payment shows in Order. User want that if there is any down payment against purchase order & purchase order contain real order, they want that FBL1N/FAGLL03 report show Order Number in reports. So that down payment can be traced against Internal Order.
Now I have tested the whole scenario. everything is ok till down payment. I can seen Order number in FBL1N report and also in FAGLL03 report.
Now the problem is here,
Real Internal Order is created which will be settle to AUC asset.
Purchase order is made with Assignment category 'F' . Real Internal Order is mention with GL.
Now Down Payment is made against Purchase Order with mention Purchase Order. I can see in FBL1N report.
Now when i am going to settle Internal Order to asset, there are errors which are rectified by configuring. But when i see AUC asset, down payment is also settle on asset.
If Purchase Order is raised with amount 1500000.
Down Payment is made with amount 50000
when i settle Internal Order 1500000 & 50000 also settle on Asset.
I dont want to settle 50000 on asset and when i see KOB1 report, i only see 1500000 amount.
Or is there any report in which i can extract Order with down payment data. I can develop Z report but i want to do it in standard.
Waiting for reply....
Regards
AJ

For Down payment data,
you need to use FBL1N transaction.
probably, down payment will not reflect in internal order. Expense GL with Internal order will reflect in the internal order actual values.
Thanks
Sudhir Krishna Kumar Singh

WBS cost to be settle to Asset

Hi Frds,
I have one requirement regarding some asset work is under construction against the project.If work is under construction all cost is booking to project gl(we are using only 4 project gl,500000-labour,500001-material,500002-subcon and 500003-directcharg.),if cost is booking to project gl has to settle the cost at the menth end to project gl,but here once total work has finished after that only project gl cost has to settle or has to capitalized to the asset.
If i am not settling the project gl some cost will be show in the cji3 report,if i settle that will be capitalized partial amount but that is not correct.This is nothing but AUC(Asset under construction) how will i do the allocation structure and settlement profile configuration and how will achive this requirement.
Thanks for your advance help.
Regards,
Nivas.

Hi,
It is resolved.
We have done the AUC settings in the system.Once we have done the project settlement cost will go to Asset once work has done(After 2 or 3 months) in AIAB has to create the settlement rule and run the settlement(AIBU),Asset will be capitalized automatically.

Error in Settlement of Asset created to AuC

Hi All,
While settling an asset which was created under AuC I have encountered the following problem:
While running the T-code AIBU the system has given me the following error:
Company code not defined in Asset Accounting
Message no. AA821
Diagnosis
Company code is not defined for Assets Accounting.
Procedure
Define company code via the Customizing menu.
I have maintained all the respective settings. Kindly help me in resolving the error.
Thanks and Regards,
Kanupriya

Hi
check note 459719, if it solves the problem.
This can occur in the following cases:
1. In Transaction AIAB the settlement rule which should be used to settle a line item received a time limit, that is 'To period' and 'To fiscal' year were entered. If thus the settlement rule is not valid for the current settlement period (posting period) the line item is not settled.
2. You assigned an amount rule to a line item in Transaction AIAB, however, the value 0 was posted in this line item in valuation area 01 (for example, because of the posting with a flow type restricted to valuation areas). In this case, this line item is not settled because an amount rule only refers to valuation area 01.
Solution
Use a valid settlement rule so that the affected line item is settled.
In case 1, remove the to period and to fiscal year from the settlement rule in transaction AIAB. The settlement of a line item should only be controlled by whether a settlement rule is assigned to this line item.
In case 2, use a settlement rule with percent or equivalence number because no amount is settled in valuation area 01.
Regards

Settlement of Assets under Construction - Error Message

Dear Friends,
In one of the Co, Codes we are using the Category FXA to settle the assets under construction and when we define the Asset No. in the Settlement Receiver, the system gives the error message " Receiver Categ. G/L is not allowed by Settlement Prof. AI for this sendor". Message No. KD031.
It is not understood why the system is referring to the GL when we are putting in the Asset No. as the Settlement Receiver. However, in other Company Code we are not facing this problem. What could be the issue and what do we need to check.
Thanks for the help.
Regards,

Hi Raj
posting to Asset, also posts to FI-GL i.e. the recon account.. hence, system might be asking to allow GL
If your settl receiver is FXA, settlement will be made to that only.. Dont worry on that front
Regards
Ajay M

Error when settling to asset ko88

Hi
when i am settling to asset the following below is coming
Customizing inconsistency (contact your system administrator)
Message no. AC496
Diagoniss
Company code V100 manages parallel currencies in Asset Accounting. For each area that posts automatically online to FI, you have to define one dependent depreciation area that adopts both identical values and depreciation terms from depreciation area 01, and which is assigned to currency type 60 and currency INR. There is no depreciation area of this type defined for depreciation area 01.
Procedure
Check your Customizing settings.
thanks

Hi,
Additionally:
The error message AC496 occurred because for company code is defined and additional local currency.
1. You must define exactly one dependent area for each area that is supposed to post automatically online to reconciliation accounts (Tr OB22). However, if you do not wish to have additional currency, you can go to transaction OB22 and remove the additional currency for the company.
2. You have to define this area to take over identical values and parameters ( Tr. OABC).
regards Bernhard

Settlement Fixed Assets

Team i am trying to settle fix assets today and get the following messages
1 "Settlement before period 8 2008 is only possoble after reversal" can someone tell me in detail what I must do?
2- I also get settlement amount > Available amount
3- Execute amount settlement up to and including settlement period 008 2008
Not sure what to do on each instance, your help will be greatly appreciated.

You have already carried out settlement for the period 08.
There are two options:
- reverse the settlement for the period 08 and then execute the settlement again.
- Enter any period that is greater than period 08.
Settlement amount > available amount
I believe, you are using amount in the settlement rule. the amount you have mentioned in the settlement rule is greater than the amount posted. Check the amount specified in the settlement rule
Execute amount settlement up to and including settlement period 008 2008 - Again, settlement for certain period was not done. Check the settlement rule, its valdity and execute the settlement for all periods upto 08.
Thanks,
Sathya

AUC asset settlement to assets

Hi Experts,
I have an AUC asset amount flows from GR/IR and Miro. I need to settle it to multiple assets. I was able to distribute AUC to different assets through AIAB. Once this is done, when i go for settlement(AIBU) its giving an error msg " Settlement amount> Available amount" . I have checked the amount and found to be correct. No discrepancy in data is observed.
Thanks,
Sasidhar

hi
check the percentage maintained against each settlement rule
Edited by: AP on Apr 3, 2009 10:22 AM

Settlement of Asset Under construction

Hi Folks
Can someone please explain an overview of settling Assets under construction. I am having some issues with AUC. The actual value of asset is being taken from AUC, not from final asset. Any kind of assistance will be highly appreciated.

Hi,
The Below are some important Steps.
1. T.code KO88 - Here you settle Expences to Settlement cost Elements via internal Order or Cost Centers. Give the Settlement rule and by tht Expences will be distrubuted or settled to SCE..
2. In AIAB T.code -Here Distrubution is done from Settlement Cost Elements to AUC, Here settlement rule is defined as such.
3. In AIBU T.code - Here Settlement if Cost from AUC to Actual Asst is Done.
after AIBU Transcation is Processed, you can directly run the Deprecation for tht Asset.
Hope the above would Help in Understanding the Concept of AUC Settlements.
Thanks
Goutam

Internal order not settling as asset is already deactivated.

Hi friends,
when iam trying to post KO88 internal order settlement it is giving the message that "ASSET xxxxxxxxxx is deactivated",in my settlement rule there is not that asset another asset no is there,
where is the link for asset and IO ?
How to see the deactivated asset?
thanks,
Srini.

Hello,
Might be your said asset number is sub asset no. which is coming in the error msg asset no.
first check the relation between error msg asset and which asset you are going to do settelement.
The asset deacivation button will available in the Asset master record general data.
If helpful pls assign points,
Rams

PM order settlement to asset - but I want statistical posting to I/O????

We use internal orders for our capital budgets - we set a plan for the year. We do requisitions against the order which gives us our commitment. We have workflow to upper management to release the requisiton. Once done the req is turned into PO but at this point the account assignment is changed from F to A. When migo and miro are done you can look at the report for the internal order and see a statistical actual posting - valuation type 11. The actual posting capitalized the asset. We can settle PM orders to assets - no problem - but I want to also reference the capital budget internal order in that settlment rule. This will allow me to settle the actual costs and post to the asset but get that statistical actual amount to the internal order. How do I do this? I understand the hierarchy in SAP between cost center, order, and asset. On my settlement rule for the PM order my receiver is fixed asset, but I also put the internal order number in the order field. When I settle with KO88 the cost hits my asset but I get no statistical posting to the internal order. Is it possible?

It's not possbible to get a statistical posting against the I/O from PM order settlement.

Funds Management and Budget Check on Settlement of Assets

Dear All
We are implementing Funds Management module with BCS as budgetary tool. We have a requirement like this. At the time of PR or PO for AUC, budget need to be checked, whereas at the time of settlement of this AUC to a fixed Asset there should not be any budget check
Kindly let me know whether, this scenario can be mapped in SAP using Funds Management Module
Regards
Vivek MG

Hi,
You can build a derivation rule in FMDERIVE basing it on business transaction field. In case of assets settlement, you can derive a dummy commitment item.
Regards,
Eli

Settlement to Assets

Hi
Does anyone know how to settle from a PM or internal order to an AUC or asset using transaction types so as not to lose the original makeup of the capitalised value?
Tx...

You can only settle from an internal order or WBS to an asset under construction when these are set up as investment order /WBS.
When you have a PM or normal internal order you have firts to settle it to an investment order /WBS.
When you create a investment order /WBS it (can) create with the release an AUC
For the assets under consruction you need to have a asset class that is set-up as a AUC class.
In the investment profile you assigne the asset class and in asset accounting you assign the default values from that asset class

Settlement of Asset

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for