Status issues with sales process

Hi Friends,
I have an issue with thrid party sales order processing
Step#1
My client runs the sales order for
Material Qty
p-100 10
p-101 10
p-102 10
step-2
Purchase requisition created and from vendor delivery happened
Step-3
My user created billing with reference of sales order for below material
Material quantity
p-100 20
p-101 10
p-102 20
step-4
user found mistake and he cancelled the invoice and created new billing document
for
material quantity
p-100 10
p-102 10
again he found mistake and cancelled this billing document and create one more billing document with reference of sales order
material quantity
p-100 10
p-101 10
p-102 10
now the issue is for p-100 and p-101 it showing being process and p-101 it showing status as completed
please suggest m

Just checking to see if anyone has re-produced any of these issues...
Thanks!
Jason Walters

Similar Messages

  • SCM Issues with Sales Orders Created through CRM

    Hi All,
    I'm trying to ascertain any issues with ERP processing that will not update orders created through CRM, i see there was a OSS Note some time back informing that the backorder reschedule program would not update orders created in the CRM system. Is this still the case and are there any other process that we should be marking as an issue?
    Thanks

    Hi Sirisha,
    The solution depends on the exact issue you are facing.
    The CRM Sales Order is created OK, but you only see the error when you open the Sales Order?
    If this is the case, then you can follow the steps below:
    1. Find the Message ID and Message No for the error message
    2. Use Program - CRM_MESSAGES_DELETE to delete error messages from the error producing Sales Orders.
    Let me know if this is not the issue you are facing.
    Regards,
    Nelson

  • Issue with sales order stock that is referencing a non-existing sales order

    We have an issue with sale order stock.
    Due to user error we have ended up with a negative quant of sales order stock in a bin. Further the error was due to mis-keying of sales order number. Hence this negative quant is referencing a sales order that does not exist.
    We need to get rid of this quant.
    I thought of cycling this quant off as a solution. And hence replicated the scenario in the test system. I was able to create a TO to cycle it off but cannot clear the differences from 999 . The error I get while trying to do this is "SD document not in database or has been archived" . This error is true since the sales order actually does not exist. So cycling it off did not work.
    Can anyone suggest how we can get rid of this negative quant of sales order stock ?
    Thanks

    Hi,
    You said that your user mistyped the SO number and it resulted in a -quant. In which transaction was it possible? If I give a non existing no. SAP doesn't allow me to book.
    If I were you I would check both in WM & IM what the user had done...step-by-step...
    Negative quant comes to existance in interim storage type if we book e.g. a GI. It should have started in IM...how was your user be able to do that??? If it was possible cannot you reverse the IM booking?
    (...if all else fails...cannot you create a SO document with external number assignment with the same number?...)
    BR
    Csaba
    Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Jun 24, 2008 8:31 PM

  • Issue With Sales Document Type in BW.

    Dear Experts,
    I am facing an Issue with Sales Document Type(Object name is 0DOC_TYPE).
    when i am loading data from R/3 to BW It is converting Sales Document type as follow
    Sales Document Type in R/3                         Sales Document Type in BW
    OR                                                                        TA
    CR                                                                        G2
    DR                                                                        L2
    I check with an ABAPer and he told that there is conversion exit for this Object so that's why it is converting when sending to BW. But the user wants to see in Report same as it is in R/3 like OR, CR DR ... etc.
    I have done some investigation and found that the conversion exit (CONVERSION_EXIT_AUART_INPUT and CONVERSION_EXIT_AUART_OUTPUT) are converting the values based in the table TAUUM
    The staructure of TAUUM is
    MANDT(Client)  SPRAS(Language) AUART(Sales document type (not converted)   AUART_SPR(Language key for sales document type)
    and values are
    100 E TA OR
    100 E G2 CR
    etc....
    The same Conversion exits(CONVERSION_EXIT_AUART_INPUT and CONVERSION_EXIT_AUART_OUTPUT) and table TAUUM are available in BW as well. So i thought I can Use InfoObject 0DOC_TYPE by changing it's conversion Routine as AUART(which runs based on the above mentioned conversion exits).
    but the the problem is table TAUUM(Pool Table) does't have any data in BW.
    So can anyone tell me is there any option to load data into table TAUUM from R/3 or any other option to solve this issue.
    Your ideas will really help's me.
    Thanks in advance,
    Dara.

    Hi Venkat,
    Thanks a lot for your immediate response.
    The InfoObject 0DOC_TYPE was without conversion exit by default. but when data coming from R/3 it is converting and sending to BW So that's why i am planning to use conversion exit "AUART" in the info Object.
    I checked data in R/3 using RSA3 it is showing sales document type as "OR" and for the same transaction data when i checked in PSA it is showing as "TA".
    Could you please let me know if there any other options.
    Thanks in advance,
    Dara.

  • Overall processing status issue for sales order regarding services

    Hello,
    I have the following issue. I am billing a standard service (service without delivery) to a customer. The process goes ok, I issue an invoice, post it and generate an accounting document. Then I create a cancellation invoice. Now I want to reject my sales order. I assign reason for rejection to the item. The header and item status says it is u2018fully rejectedu2019, but the overall processing status says the sales order is u2018openu2019 and therefore appears in reports regarding open orders. I gave also a billing block, deleted the schedule line for the service so that the ordered quantity for the item equals to u20180u2019, but still the overall processing status of the order is u2018openu2019. This is standard SAP functionality (as I checked it). So can anyone explain me how to change this status to exclude this order from open order list? Or maybe someone may want to explain me why this is standard SAP process and what is the reason for the system to want to keep my order u2018openu2019?
    Thanks in advance,
    BR,|

    Place the reason for rejection in the status tab at item level, we are doing same, and the order lines does not show in open lines .
    Regards
    Chandrasekhar

  • Issue with Sales office values in BI

    Hi Team,
         We have a issue with the sales office values in a BI report.
    The report displays 7 sales office values for the division 01. Where as in ECC, we have only 6 sales office values exists for the same division 01.
    These sales office 7 has been have been loaded on april n may months.
    The master data has all the sales office values 01- 10.
    Those sales office values are coming from the Infocubes, 'Billing Document Condition' & 'Open Orders'.
    I have the checked the Multiprovider, Infocubes and the InfoObject and values exists.
    How to proceed further and correct these values?
    Appreciate your expert guidance...
    Thanks
    Regards
    Santhosh Kumar N

    Hi Krishna,
               Thanks for the reply.  The Sales office field is directly mapped  in the transformation and does not have any routine. Its the Key field.
    The Billing Document Condition infocube is being feed by the DSO '2LIS_13_VDKON - Billing Document Condn' and datasource is '2LIS_13_VDKON'.
    The Open Orders infocube is being feed by the DSO Document Order item / Delivery;  below which we have another 3 DSO.
    1st DSO has the Datasource '2LIS_13_VDITM'
    2nd DSO has the Datasource '2LIS_11_VAITM'
    3rd DSO has the Datasource '2LIS_11_V_SSL'
    The Sales Office 7 has txn records for the month of April & May.
    The report built on top of a Multiprovider and the for the months June and July, we have txn records fine for the sales office 01 - 06.
    Please help me, if i am missing anything here and make me to understand better.

  • Statistics technical content activation issue with MD process chain in BI7

    Hi,
    Let me give you history of the issue first.
    I had to activate the Statistics in BI7. I followed the SAP Note 965386 and activated the Technical Content.
    Faced activation issues in MD process chain, Content Master Data-0TCT_MD_C_FULL_P01. It dint get activated, Followed the SAP note 1065919, which asked me to remove the below process from RSPC and activate it.
    Load data- Process Variant Attribute and
    Load data- Process Variant Text.
    I did the same and it got activated after removing them.
    Issue is. Later knew that manually activating the Process chain from Content would have activated those Infopackages aswell.
    Now how should I get those processes into the chain and activate? Based on your suggestions, I can let you know what all I have been trying to fix it?
    Relying on you for solution.
    Thanks
    Pavan

    Thank You Neethika,
    I have this issue solved. I replicated the data sources, activated those infoPackages manually and then added those variants into the process chain manually. So my MD chain now has all the necessary process.
    Now i need to schedule them and see if it runs with out any errors. I will keep this thread open till i run it to take your help if i get any errors while running them.
    Thanks
    Pavan

  • Issues with parallel processing in Logical Database PCH and PNP

    Has anyone encountered issues when executing programs in parallel  that utilizes the logical database PCH or PNP?
    Our scenario is the following:
    We having have 55 concurrent jobs that execute a program that use the logical database PCH at a given time.  We load the the PCHINDEX table with the code below.
          wa_pchindex-plvar = '01'.
          wa_pchindex-otype = 'S'.
          wa_pchindex-objid_low = index_objid.
          APPEND wa_pchindex TO pchindex.
    We have seen instances where when the program is executed in parallel, with each process having its own range of positions id's, that some positions are dropped or some are added that is outside the range of the given process.
    For example:
    process 1 has a range of positions ID's 1-10
    process 2 has a range of positions ID's 11-20
    process 3 has a range of positions ID's 21-30
    Process 3 drops position 25 and adds position 46.
    Has anyone faced a similar issue?
    Thanks for your help.
    Best Regards,
    Duke

    Hi,
    first of all, you should read [Using Parallel Execution|http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14223/usingpe.htm#DWHSG024] in documentation for your version - almost all of these topics are covered there.
    1. According to my server specification how much DOP i can specify.It depends not only on number of CPU. More important factors are settings of PARALLEL_MAX_SERVERS and PARALLEL_ADAPTIVE_MULTI_USER.
    2. Which option for Setting Parallel is good - Using the 'alter table A parallel 4' or passing the parallel hints in the sql statementsIt depends on your application. When setting PARALLEL on a table, all SQL dealing with that table would be considered for parallel execution. So if it is normal for your app to use parallel access to that table, it's OK. If you want to use PX on a limited set of SQL, then hints or session settings are more appropriate.
    3. We have a batch processing jobs which are loading data into the tables from flat files (24*7) using sql loader. is it possible to parallel this operation and any negative effect if enabled parallel.Yes, refer to documentation.
    4. Query or DML - which one will be perform best with parallel option.Both may take advantages of using PX (with some restrictions to Parallel DML) and both may run slower than non-PX versions.
    5. What are the negative issue if parallel option is enabled.1) Object checkpoint happens before starting parallel FTS (true for >=10gR2, before that version tablespace checkpoint was used)
    2) More CPU and memory resources are used with PX - it may be both benefit and an issue, especially with concurrent PX.
    6. what are the things to be taken care while enabling the parallel option.Read the documentation - it contains almost all you need to know. Since you are using RAC, you sould not forget about method of PX slaves load balancing between nodes. If you are on 10g, refer to INSTANSE_GROUPS/PARALLEL_INSTANCE_GROUPS parameters, if you are using 11g then properly configure services.

  • Battery Status issues with SL 10.6.1

    I have a brand new macbook Pro 13inch. After getting the new update my battery life indicator hasnt been right since. It goes up in time then takes a chunk of time out. Then look at it might add it back then before you know it. Its running on reserve battery life. This is a big issue with the new upgrade. Is there any fix for this?

    The "time remaining" displayed on the battery is your macs best guess of how much time you have left based on what you are doing with your mac at that moment in time. Say if you are running google earth, watching youtube and other CPU intensive tasks then the battery will show a significantly reduced time. However, when you are only word processing with the screen half lit then the time remaining will be a lot higher. Also note that switching back and forth between these scenarios will fluctuate your remaining time too. The best way to judge how quickly you are draining your battery is by looking at percent remaining.
    Steve

  • Issues with FMSEdge process while security scan in progress

    We have recently deployed Flash Media Streaming server 3.5.2 and Flash Media Encoder on a Windows 2003 machine. We are able to capture live streaming and the regular streaming of recorded video’s without any issues.
    We are encountering an issue with one of the FMS’s process’s whenever a security scan is performed on the machine, during the security scan process one of the process’s for FMS called FMSEdge.exe creeps all the way up to 100% CPU utilization. This is causing problems with security scan not completing.
    Have any of you experienced this kind of problem? Could you please let us know if there is solution to this issue.

    Hi [email protected],
    Please refer the solution in Troubleshoot Adobe Download Assistant - http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-suite/kb/troubleshoot-download-assistant.html
    If you continue to face difficulties you can try initiating a direct download by following the steps listed at http://forums.adobe.com/thread/981369

  • How to allocate cost variances during goods issue in sales process?

    Hi all,
    In China GAAP, cost variances ( variance between standard cost and actual cost) should be capitalized to balance sheet at month-end.
    Q1: Could I settle the cost variance to a B/S account instead of P/L account? What's SAP or your recommendation?
    Q2: if we settle the cost variances to a B/S account, How could we allocate the production cost when post goods issue for sales order? i.e
    Dr: COGS
    Cr: cost of finished goods
    Cr: production cost (B/S account, cost variances by proration of sold)
    Please advice.Thanks in advance
    Regards,
    Alex LIU
    Message was edited by:
            Shuping Liu

    Hi,
    All variances between Standard & Actual cost should be settled to a P/L A/c as these are similar to Purchase Price variances on Raw Material purchases.
    If you are valuing your Finished Goods @ Standard cost, then the difference between the Standard & the Actual cost should be debited or credited to a Price or Cost difference P/L A/c either at the time of doing the GR of the Production or at the time of posting the Goods Issue for Sales Order.
    The balance in the Cost difference accounts needs to be finally posted to profitability segments in COPA.
    Regards,
    Assign points if useful.

  • Issue with page processing - confirmation message & show /hide a button..

    Hello,
    I am working on a to do list application.
    I have events and for each event, I show list of tasks (grouped in reports based on the calculated task's status).
    In one region I have a drop down list of events and a Select Event button.
    For each task, I had to create a CLOSE option (initially I used a link, but the requester wanted a confirmation before closing the task).
    Now I have a checkbox for each task (generated dynamically with apex_item.checkbox(1,task_id)).
    Closing a task in my application means to set the end_date to sysdate.
    I followed the instructions from
    http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/cd/B31036_01/doc/appdev.22/b28839/check_box.htm#CEGEFFBD. I've created also a button and a process and updated the sql from "delete" to "update".
    The process is set: OnSubmit - After Computations and Validations; Run Process Once per page visit (default).
    The issue number 1 is that I see the confirmation message (that tasks have been closed) every time I reload the page (the same when I click Select_event button).. not only after I press on that Close_task button..
    For issue number 2, I have to mention that I've added a condition to show / hide the Close_task button, only if I have at least 1 task in the report.
    The issue number 2 is that I see the button only if I click 2 times on the Select_Event button.. The same is for hide.
    I feel like I am missing something very important about how to synchronize different events(buttons clicks), processes..
    help..?
    Thank you!
    Anca

    This forum is magic..
    As soon as write here, I find the answer!
    Issue 1: I fixed it by specifying this: When Button Pressed (Process After Submit When this Button is Pressed) and my button. I miseed this 1st time.
    Issue 2: I moved the button after the report.. and now it's working just fine!
    I did this about it for some time before asking the question here.. but I just had to write here and got the right answer ;)
    Have a nice day!
    Anca

  • Inbound IDoc w/message ORDERS - issues with error processing

    We are using inbound IDoc ORDERS05 with message type ORDERS to create the sales orders in SAP. In WE20 we have the following settings:
    - partner type LS (= Sales Org VKORG)
    - process code ORDE
    - trigger by background program
    - post-processing agent of type US (user) with a user ID.
    We create IDocs through an ABAP program and use RBDAPP01 to post the IDocs. When there is an application error in the IDoc posting we expect the designated user to receive a workflow item in the SAP Inbox, but for some reason this is not happening.
    I did some research and went through all the possible settings for workflow, task, etc. and everything seems to be set up correctly. When debugging RBDAPP01 I have noticed that it calls FM APPLICATION_IDOC_POST_IMMEDIAT, which, in turn, calls IDOC_START_INBOUND. If IDOC_START_INBOUND returns SY-SUBRC = 1 then the workflow item is sent correctly to the designated user, exactly as we want. But for some reason it returns 0 (I changed it to 1 in the debugger).
    It seems that IDOC_START_INBOUND reads TEDE2 records (TEVE2-EVCODE = ORDE) and sy-subrc = 1 is only possible when EDIVR2 is 1,2,3 or 4. In our case TEDE2-EDIVR2 = 6. It seems that TEDE2 is maintained in the transaction WE42. However, I tried to change the settings there but it affects the IDoc processing in whole (IDoc gets some odd status and doesn't get processed as before). I've also tried to use process code ORDE_BY_WORKFLOW in WE20 with the same "success".
    What do we need to do to get a workflow item for the errors that happen in the application layer when IDoc is posted? Is it even possible with this message type?
    Any ideas would be appreciated.

    Hi,
    Can you please share how do you overcome the problem, so that it can be helpful for others.

  • Issue with BDC processing of F-65 after upgrade to ECC 6.0

    Dear ABAP gurus,
                  We have upgraded our SAP system from version 4.7 to ECC 6.0.            
    We are facing issue when processing BDC sessions for transaction code F-65.
    The screen which appears for Assignment to a profitability segment creates issue when processing BDC for F-65.
    The screen name is SAPLKEAK and the corresponding screen number is 0300.
    This screen displays the characteristic and its corrsponding values. The characteristics and its values are pulled in from FICO Config at runtime when you execute F-65 and all relevant Tcodes of business transaction RFBU.
    We checked for the characteristics maintained for Characteristic group via std. transaction code KEPA. It shows 4 characteristics listed of which 2 are optional and 2 are mandatory. The same settings are available in older version as well as in ECC 6.0. Also validated the assignment of characteristic group to the actual data i.e to the business transaction RFBU via Tcode KE4G.
    When we do recording in SHDB in both the systems, the older version shows it correctly displaying 4 fields(2 optional and 2 mandatory) in the Assignment to a profitability segment screen whereas the new system displays some 12 additional fields. Also none of the fields appear mandatory.
    The issue is we are still not able to identify whether this is a technical issue or functional issue.
    Searched for relevant OSS notes but couldn't find any.
    Anyone of you who have faced this issue, please respond immediately.
    We have this issue to be resolved on high priority.
    Help will be highly appreciated.
    Regards,
    Kavita

    This issue was also posted with an OSS-message to SAP, and the solution was to run this  program SD_PLANVALUE_UPDATE
    Berit

  • Issue with the process chain?

    Hi All,
    I have a process chain triggerred by an event.I had this transported into Q box.After moving it to Q i did click on acativate and schedule icon.When i triggered the event in Sm64.The process chain triggerred successfully.The next day when i tried to trigger the event ,the process did nothing,its only after i actiavted the process chain and triggrred the event the process.
    I know the process chain should be good after ictivated once when  moved into a new system.Can anybody tell me how to resolve my issue of activating the PC whenever i wnat to trigger it.What i am i missing here?
    Please advice,urgent

    I think Geo answered what you want and what I wanted to tell.
    Thanks Geo
    Ther are two  basic things
    --> In order that your PC responds to your "Event & Parameter", maintain the same and PC <b>should be in scheduled status</b>
    --> the periodic check box <b>schedules again</b> once the current run completes. i.e makes ready the PC for the next run whenever the next "event and parameter" gets triggered by any means ( you no need to activate and schedule again)
    Sorry If my answer confused you..Hope everything is clear now...!
    VJ

Maybe you are looking for