Vendor Quality Score

I want to map the following scenario related to vendor score calculation.
During GR, score is calculated using
(1* Accepted Qty + 0.4* Conditionally accepted Qty+ 0* Rejected Qty) / (whole divided by) Total quantity. How can we configure this in customisation for vendor score.
Also
Here I will track inprocess rejection quantity, and if I found any of these rejection is caused due to above vendor I need to add those rejections also to that vendors rejected qty and calculate vendor score using above formula.
Message was edited by:
sandip raut

Firts question - you can try in do it in OMGL
Second question - I donot think it is linked.

Similar Messages

Vendor blocking after particular quality score automatically

Hi Everybody
I hav following seniario
My client want to block the vendor for either creating purchase order or Goods receipt automatically after that particular vendor quality score reaches below certain level
After blocking the vendor he can release the vendor manully
Plz suggest
Regards
Ashutosh Shende
9860681314

Hi,
You need to go with Enhacement-User Exit, This needs a code to be place which will check the score and if it below the level it will throw an error.please check for exit.
thanks,
surya

Quality Score in Vendor Rating

Dear Sir/Mam
I want to know about quality score which comes in Usage decision,Now in our case when inspection lot is generated we have only one case if accepted the quality score is 100 and when rejected 1,but our requriment is we want different quality score,i maintained different score in selected set,my concern whether this quality score has impact on vendor evaluation score( for quality criteria),how it is calculated please guide.
Regards
Kunal
Edited by: kunal joshi on Mar 26, 2009 6:07 AM

Dear Kunal
Quality score are maintained for quantitative valuation of the quality of inspection lots against a vendor, material , customer
1) They have to be first maintained in the client level setting
SPRO > QM> Maintain settings at client level> You need to maintain the highest quality score (100) and lowest quality score (1) system doesnt take 0. also Lower limit for good quality (90)
2) it is maiinly used in the selected sets for usage decision
QS51/ 03 catalogs for each UD code you can give a Quality score. So while you are giving UD system picks up this score and update the same for inspection lot , material, vendor, customer as applicable.
You can give 100 as quality score for clean acceptance, 1 for complete rejection, may be 50 for partial acceptance etc.
for eg you can maintain your UD selected sets like this Code, Description and UD score
001     Clean Acceptance     A Accepted (OK)     100
002     Accepted subject to Rework     R Rejected (not OK)     50
003     Accepted with deviation     R Rejected (not OK)     70
004     Accepted after segregation (Partial qty)     R Rejected (not OK)     60
005     Rejected     R Rejected (not OK)     1
006     Accepted subject to functional test     A Accepted (OK)     100
007     UD Changed due to line rejection     R Rejected (not OK)     30
008     UD changed due to problem at Customer     R Rejected (not OK)     1
009     Subcontract return - ABB     A Accepted (OK)     100
010     Auto UD for Skip Lot     A Accepted (OK)     100

Quality score and vendor evaluation?

Dear Sapient,
Can any one help me to know how quality score in QA11 or QA12 is hitting vendor evaluation programs?
Regards,
Kaushal Rai

Hi
Rejection/complaint : This comes from the Following calculation.
Only consider the Q2 type of notification score.
If no complaint then this is 100 otherwise following formula:
The complaints score is calculated from the number of complaints against the vendor, according to the following formula:
QSc = QScmin + (QScmax - QScmin) * (1 - (N * K) / (F * U))
QSc = QScmin if (N * K) > (F * U)
QScmin = Lower limit for QSc
QKZmax = Upper limit for QSc
N       = Number of Q-notifications in the applicability period
K       = Estimated nonconformity costs
F       = Share of business volume for QSc calculation
U       = Sales of the vendor in the applicability period
K is maintained at
QCC0>Quality notification->Information system--->Define NC cost for Vendor Evaluation
Audit:
The audit score is either the average quality score for the audits or is made up of the quality scores for the most recent audits. You can also enter an audit score manually.
This is 07 inspection type average score.
Again depend upon UD score of 07 inspection type.
I hope this will help
Regards
Sujit

Quality score in vendor valuation

Dear SAP gurus
Kindly guide me how the Quality score of UD used to evaluate the vendor .Which formula is used.
Thanks
Alpana

Hi ,
Go through the below links:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/8d/b985b0414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/bp_imcv1500/IMC_DE/HTML/E82_QMProcure_EN_DE.htm
Cheers,
Tushar

Material Level Total Vendor Quality Rating (TVQR) Report

Hi, In SAP QM there is ME61 standard report is available for vendor evalution
But i want This report at Vendor Evalution at material level

Hi Gurus,
we have use
Object Name
Field     Short Text     Data Element
/ Field Type     Field Length     Additional info
T001W-WERKS     Plant     WERKS_D     CHAR- 4     Mandatory
MARA-MATNR     Material     MATNR     CHAR-18     Mandatory
LFA1- LIFNR     Account Number of Vendor     LIFNR     CHAR-10     Non-Mandatory
S068- SPMON     Period to analyze - month     SPMON     NUMC-6     Mandatory
S068-ART     Inspection Type     QPART     CHAR-8
S068- LIFNR     Vendor Account Number     ELIFN     CHAR-10
S068-KLASSE_A     Absolute Frequency of Quality Score Class A     QKLASSE_A     INT4-10
S068-KLASSE_B     Absolute Frequency of Quality Score Class B     QKLASSE_B     INT4-10
S068-KLASSE_C     Absolute Frequency of Quality Score Class C     QKLASSE_C     INT4-10
S068-KLASSE_D     Absolute Frequency of Quality Score Class D     QKLASSE_D     INT4-10
S068-KLASSE_E     Absolute Frequency of Quality Score
Class E     QKLASSE_D     INT4-10
S068-ZHLSELECT     Number of Summarized Inspection Lots (Without Cancellation)     QZHLSELECT     INT4-10
QMEL-QMART     Notification Type     QMART     CHAR-2
QMEL-QMDAB     Date for Notification Completion     QMDAB     DATS-8
S012-SPMON     Period to analyze - month     SPMON     NUMC-6
S012-LIFNR     Vendor Account Number     ELIFN     CHAR-10
S012-WERKS     Plant     EWERK     CHAR-4
S012-MATNR     Material Number     MATNR     CHAR-18
S012-REWRT     Invoice Amount     MC_REWRT     CURR-15
score wtg M all this are getting calculated from elbp, t147i,t147e, t147c
in elbp table vendor is there
from where I will get the materia?

REGARDING VENDOR QUALITY RATING

Hi All
My client wants vendor quality rating
for this i maintend quality score in clint data maintened score procedure and assing it to inspection type
define the formula for quality rating in functional modul for Q score procedure
is this suficient or i m missing some thing pls tell me
regards
Sachin

HI
endor Evaluation for Purchasing
Define the weighting keys in SM30 - V_T147J.
Weighting keys 01 and 02 are defined in the standard system. You combine the following
weighting shares for the standard main criteria:
Main criterion     Key 01 Key 02
Price                   1      5
Quality                 1      5
Delivery                1      2
Gen. service/support    1      1
Ext. service provision 1      2
Define the criteria in SM30 - V_T147G - Double click on the line items
In this step, you define the criteria by which the system computes scores for vendors and
specify whether the scores for the subcriteria are computed manually, semi-automatically, or
automatically.
You can also store your own methods of computation for the scores for subcriteria in the
form of user exits. The enhancement MM06L001 is available for this purpose.
Define the scope of list in SM30 - V_T147M - Double click on the line items
Define Purchasing Organization data for vendor evaluations in transaction OMGL.
An example :-
How the system calculates the score for the automatic subcriteria
"On-Time Delivery Performance"?
The system uses the statistics-relevant delivery date in the purchase order
(Items -> Delivery Schedule) and the goods receipt date to calculate date variances.
You use the statistics-relevant delivery date, for example, if you know that the vendor
will not deliver the material as scheduled on September 15 but on September 30. Enter the
delivery date as September 30, but enter the statistics-relevant delivery date as
September 15.
In calculating the score for on-time delivery performance, the system will then not use
the actual delivery date, but the statistics-relevant delivery date. This has a negative
effect on the score for this goods receipt.
However, materials planning and control uses the realistic delivery date (September 30)
which the vendor will actually adhere to.
The system considers only goods receipts against purchase orders and scheduling agreements
into stores and the release of GR blocked stock into stores. In the standard system, these
are the movement types 101 and 105.
Minimum Delivery Percentage - OMGL in the On-time delivery section
If you do not want a vendor to receive a very good score if he delivered the goods on time,
but did not deliver the required quantity, you can maintain a minimum delivery percentage
in Customizing.
Assume you set the Min. del. perc. parameter to 60% and the vendor delivers the goods on
time, but only 55% of the ordered quantity. Although the goods receipt is punctual, it is
not included in the calculation of the vendoru2019s score for on-time delivery performance. So
that the non-scoring of the on-time delivery performance criterion in this case does not
bring an unfair advantage in comparison with a poor score, the vendor is awarded a low score
for quantity reliability. On-time delivery performance is thus always to be seen in
conjunction with quantity reliability.
Standardizing Delivery Date Variance - OMGL in the On-time delivery section
To rate delivery date variances in days, maintain the Std.del.time var. parameter.
If you assign a lower standard value, this means that relatively low date variances produce
high percentage variances. If you set a higher standard value, this results in a relatively
low percentage variance:
The Std.del.time var. parameter has the value 20. The goods receipt took place on Nov. 27;
the statistical delivery date was Nov. 15. There is thus a difference of 12 days.
The system calculates the percentage variance as follows:
12 / 20 x 100 = 60
If the Std.del.time var. parameter had the value 60, the variance would be 20%
(12 / 60 x 100 = 20).
If you do not maintain this parameter, the system calculates the delivery time variance via
the firm zone in the case of scheduling agreements, and via the order date and the
statistics-relevant delivery date in the case of purchase orders.
With regrds
Yashodhan

Quality score by usage decision?

Dear SAPIENTS,
Can any one help me in creation of this configuration setting?
I would like to have quality score calculation from usage decision. Score calculation should be done by number of quantity received against order.
Suppose if 100 quantity ordered:
25% Deviation means 75 only received then score is 75
Likewise for 50%, 75% and 100%
Regards,

Hi
please refer
Re: Quality Score in Vendor Rating
Regards'
Sujit

Formula to calculate mean Quality Score

Hello!
What is the formula to calculate mean quality score?
Regards,
VM

Means quality score in broader prospect means
summation of quality score of number of inspection lots divided by the number of inspection lots...
for more Refer
Re: REGARDING VENDOR QUALITY RATING
http://www.sap-basis-abap.com/sapqm004.htm
Quality Score Calculation?

Quality score & quality level

Hi Experts,
Can anybody please help.New comer in QM.Please help.
How system calculate Quality score & quality level.What setting required for it. And where it is use. Please do not suggest sap library or F1 help.Please help.

hi
Evaluation of Quality Levels
You can use this function to can select quality levels, display the selected quality levels in a list, reset or tighten selected quality levels, display the data and dynamic modification rules for selected quality level records, and display the dynamic modification history for quality levels as a graphic or in a list.
Quality levels that have been deleted can no longer be evaluated (that is, you can no longer obtain a dynamic modification history of the inspection lots that were included in these quality levels).
If the system finds more than one quality level record for the selection conditions, it switches to a dynamic selection list that contains all quality levels that meet the selection conditions.
If only one quality level exists for the selection criteria, the system switches directly to the dynamic modification history list for the corresponding quality level. The dynamic selection list appears by choosing Goto ® Back. You can make changes in this list. There are the following functions in the dynamic selection list:
In the transaction Edit list (menu path: Logistics --> Quality management --> Quality inspection -->Quality level -->Edit list)
Creating a Quality Level Manually
Use
In most cases, you will not need to create a quality level manually. However, if you are implementing the Quality Management (QM) application component for the first time, you may want to enter data for the quality levels recorded in your previous system.
Prerequisites
You can only create a quality level manually for lot-based dynamic modification.
Procedure
Choose Logistics -->Quality management --> Quality inspection --> Quality level --> Create.
Enter the necessary data on the initial screen for creating a quality level and choose Quality level.
You define the dynamic modification criteria (material, vendor, manufacturer, or customer) and the inspection plan for which the quality level will be maintained on the initial screen.
Enter the following data on the screen for creating quality levels:
Next inspection stage
Number of inspections or inspection lots that (based on the dynamic modification valuation) have been completed since the last inspection stage change or were accepted without an inspection (skip)
Number of inspections or inspection lots (based on the dynamic modification valuation) that were rejected since the last inspection stage change
Reset date on which the quality level again uses the initial inspection stage (specified in the dynamic modification rule) as the current inspection stage
Earliest possible deletion date for the quality level
The system makes entries in all other fields if:
An inspection lot is created.
A usage decision is made.
Save your data.
The initial screen for creating a quality level appears and the system informs you that the quality level was created.
-ashok

Quality Score for manual inspection lot

Dear All,
As per the UD codes selected during the UD, the quality score for the vendor is updated.
This happens for both of the following cases.
1) Lot generated during GRN
2) Lot created manually
Is there any requirement of updating the score for manual lots. Is it useful.
I am updating the score for the samples received from vendor. Then again updating the score after I receive the actual qty.
So vendor score is updated twice. Is it the correct process of giving score to vendor through UD.
Regards
Ruta

Hi Ruta,
It is not correct to award the quality score for samples, samples you can handle separatly through manual lot generation, you can generate the lot using separate inspection type( may be 7 as vendor audit / samples) which does not have quality score assigned.
And for actual lots generated throgh GR against PO (01 insp type) you can assign the actual quality scores . Quality scores / rating using this process will be correct and realistic one.
Best Regards,
Shekhar

Quality score

how to do setting of quality score for vendor materials as per our requirements which are as under.
1 ) weightage of rejection at incoming stage
2 ) weightage of sorting at incoming stage
3 ) weightage of return from production
4 ) weightage of customer return due to vendor problem
5 ) weightage of material accepted under deviation
regards,
rakesh patel

Not in SAP standard, so you need to develop some program.
I would suggest you discuss this requirement to your ABAPer.
1) 2) 5) Quaity score based on weighting of rejection, sorting, management deviation at incoming inspection.
- Develop a function module for calculation of quality score
(You should define how the system calculates the quality score.)
- Define new quality score procedure in configuration
(SPRO > Quality Management > Quality Inspection > Inspection Lot Completion > Define Quality Score Procedure)
- Assign new quality score procedure in inspection setup of material master QM view
3) 4) Which process in SAP do you have for "return from production or customer due to vendor problem".
If you have another inspection type, you can solve with above solution.
If not, let us know how SAP can get the information for calculation of quality score.
Regards
Luke

Quality Score in Quality Management

Dear Friends,
Plesae help me to explore how the quality score in quality management is updated.
What are all the configuration required.
I have created selected sets & assigned quality score.
How the defect classes come into picture.
What is the use of assignment of score to defect classes.
How the vendor gets score fnally. From selected sets or from the defect classes or from the combination of the both.
Please clarify.
Regards

Hi Anuradha,
Plesae help me to explore how the quality score in quality management is updated.
What are all the configuration required.
In QS51 >> select catalog 3 and plant >> select any selected set and click on selected set codes >>
different codes will be displayed along with valuation and quality score.
Scores which you maintain here are updated automatically when you give UD. You can define scores as per clients requirement ex . if lot is ok then 100, if rejected 1 , if accepted with deviation say 50 etc.
How the defect classes come into picture.
Defect class will not come in picture when you use catalog '3' i.e. for UD, defect class comes in picture in following cases :
1) QS41 >> catalog 9, while defining the defect types you have to assign class i.e. type of defect Major, minor or surface defect this you can assign as per clients need.
2) QS51 >> Catalog 1, when you give valuation code you have to define defect class fr rejects.
What is the use of assignment of score to defect classes.
Where are you assigning score and defect class??
How the vendor gets score fnally. From selected sets or from the defect classes or from the combination of the both.
Vendor get score from selected sets, if there is defect in lot then you will give UD as rejected automatically vendor will get score 1.
Score is linked with UD directly and not with defect class. Considering the type of defect you will give UD and vendor score will update accordingly.
Please revert if any doubts.
Best Regards,
Shekhar

Quality scores updation

Hi Gurus ,
Can anybody tell me How quality scores updates in system for a material or vendor . As per my knoweledge Scores update only by Usage decision codes . Is any othe thing from which score gets updated .
Suppose i make defects recording and based upon that i make a notificaton , then the defects wt i have activited in system , by determining that can quality score gets updated .
For quality scores we mention values in QS51 (selected sets). and we also mention values for Defects class also , my question is score which i maintained in Defects clases wt is effect of these score .
Thanks in advance .
Amit

Please go through this and come back with your question, where are you did the setting, did you do any settings, if so which level, pl let us know
Define Quality Score Procedure
In this step, you define the procedures for determining the quality score.
The quality score procedure is defined in the inspection setup for the material master at plant level. You can define a default value for this procedure in the inspection type.
Requirements
The following specification limits have been defined in theSettings at Client Level.
Highest quality score
Lowest quality score
Lower limit for good quality
If you want to use quality score procedures that access the weighted shares of defects for the characteristics, you must maintain the characteristic weights.
If you want to use quality score procedures that access the quality score of the characteristics, you must maintain thedefect classes.
If you want to use quality score procedures, in which the system calculates the share of scrap, you must:
Check whether procedures for estimating the scap share have been defined inCustomizing
Assign suitable procedures for estimating the scrap share to the characteristics in the task list
Identify inspection characteristics as relevant for scrap in theircontrol indicators
Standard Settings
A number of commonly used procedures for determining the quality score are implemented in the standard system:
Quality score from the usage decision
Quality score from the share of defects in the lot
Quality score from the shares of defects for the characteristics
From the maximum share of defects
From the weighted average share of defects
Quality score from the quality score of the characteristics
From the minimum (worst) quality score
From the weighted average quality score
The table has the delivery class G. The following name range is reserved for the user
Quality score procedure 9, A, ... , Z*
Recommendation
Use the procedure in the standard system.
Decide on certain procedures for each inspection type; if possible, do not differentiate according to material groups or plants.
Activities
1. Determine which procedures for calculating the quality score should be used. You can make a distinction on the basis of the:
---Plant
---Inspection type
2. Modify the table of quality score procedures according to your needs. If the procedures contained in the standard system are not sufficient, you must create additional procedures using function modules.
3. Define the quality score procedures in the Default Values for the Inspection Type or in the inspection setup for the material.

Overall Quality score Main criterian?

Dear SAPIENTS,
In the T-code ME63 I can see Old score and New Score in my system. Now this New score is getting updated according to UD in QA11 but Old score is remaining 100 all the time. Can any one tell me how its getting calculated?
Regards,
Kaushal Rai

Hi
u2022 Goods Receipt (GR)
The goods receipt score is calculated from the quality score (QSc) for the inspection lots, according to the following formula:
QSc = (S1 + S2) / (n1 + n2)
S1 = Sum of quality scores for the inspection lots
n1 = Number of inspection lots
n2 = Number of deliveries for materials with a quality information record, for which no inspection lots exist.
S2 = n2 * QScmax
You can break down the GR score for the vendor according to the material and the inspection type.
Regards
Sujit

Vendor Quality Score

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for