Warning while doing a DB Check on my PRD server

Dear Experts,
I have been going through a series of warnings on my DB13 since a week now whenever i perform a Check DB activity.
I have been scheduling my tasks as follows
Start Time -
Period -
Action
01:00:00               1                 Check and update optimizer statistics
02:00:00               1                  Check database
03:00:00               0                 Whole database online + redo log backup
==============================================
     But for the Check database the job log is as follows
=============================================
BR0972I Checking database operations...
BR0973W Database operation alert - level: WARNING, operation: adybgofl.cds, time: 2008-06-03 00.23.09, condition: Last archive l
BR0280I BRCONNECT time stamp: 2008-06-03 02.00.56
BR0974I Checking database messages in /oracle/RT2/saptrace/background/alert_RT2.log ...
BR0976W Database message alert - level: WARNING, line: 213333, time: 2008-05-31 10.48.51, message:
Checkpoint not complete
BR0976W Database message alert - level: WARNING, line: 213345, time: 2008-05-31 10.51.15, message:
Checkpoint not complete
BR0976W Database message alert - level: WARNING, line: 213392, time: 2008-05-31 11.02.39, message:
Checkpoint not complete
BR0976W Database message alert - level: WARNING, line: 213411, time: 2008-05-31 11.05.05, message:
Checkpoint not complete
BR0976W Database message alert - level: WARNING, line: 213430, time: 2008-05-31 11.07.42, message:
Checkpoint not complete
BR0976W Database message alert - level: WARNING, line: 213449, time: 2008-05-31 11.09.46, message:
Checkpoint not complete
BR0976W Database message alert - level: WARNING, line: 213468, time: 2008-05-31 11.13.16, message:
Checkpoint not complete
BR0280I BRCONNECT time stamp: 2008-06-03 02.00.57
BR0977I Checking database profile...
BR0978W Database profile alert - level: WARNING, parameter: LOG_BUFFER, value: 14254080 (>< 4096,512 KB)
BR0978W Database profile alert - level: WARNING, parameter: OPTIMIZER_FEATURES_ENABLE, value: 10.2.0.1 (set in parameter file)
BR0978W Database profile alert - level: WARNING, parameter: PARALLEL_EXECUTION_MESSAGE_SIZE, value:2152 (>< 16384,4096)
BR0978W Database profile alert - level: ERROR, parameter: QUERY_REWRITE_ENABLED, value: TRUE (<> FALSE)
BR0978W Database profile alert - level: ERROR, parameter: REPLICATION_DEPENDENCY_TRACKING, value: TRUE (<> FALSE)
BR0978W Database profile alert - level: WARNING, parameter: STAR_TRANSFORMATION_ENABLED, value: FALSE (<> TRUE)
BR0978W Database profile alert - level: WARNING, parameter: STATISTICS_LEVEL, value: TYPICAL (set in parameter file)
BR0280I BRCONNECT time stamp: 2008-06-03 02.00.57
BR0980I Number of changed database profile parameters: 0
BR0280I BRCONNECT time stamp: 2008-06-03 02.00.57
BR0955I Number of signaled error/warning/exception alerts for database administration: 0/0/0
BR0956I Number of signaled error/warning/exception alerts for database operations: 0/1/0
BR0957I Number of signaled error/warning/exception alerts for database messages: 0/7/0
BR0958I Number of signaled error/warning/exception alerts for database profile: 2/5/0
BR0806I End of BRCONNECT processing: cdybgwvi.chk2008-06-03 02.00.58
BR0280I BRCONNECT time stamp: 2008-06-03 02.00.58
BR0803I BRCONNECT completed successfully with warnings
External program terminated with exit code 1
BRCONNECT returned error status E
Job finished
Check and update optimizer statistics
Check database
+Whole database online + redo log backup+
I request you to kindly help on this as i am unsure WHY this is happening.
The back up and the optimizer stats end without any errors or warnings...
Kindly suggest as this is very urgent and happening daily
Regards
Hunter

Hi Harry,
You need to apply SAP recommendations on your database profile. Please check "Note 830576 - Parameter recommendations for Oracle 10g (<= 10.2.0.2)" on sap.service.com. This is because, "Check DB" checks whether db parameters are correctly setup.
Best regards,
Orkun Gedik

Similar Messages

Warning while running pre-req checks for installing 11g binaries

I am trying to install 11g binaries on my box for upgrading my production db from 10.2.0.4 to 11.1.0.7. I have dev and Prod running from the same box. I already upgraded my dev instance to 11g and its home is /opt/oracle/product/11.10/dev.
I created another path for production as /opt/oracle/product/11.1.0/prod so that I can install the 11g binaries for production in there. When I run the installer, the pre-req checks gives me two warnings -
Checking PATH environment variable...
Check complete. The overall result of this check is: Failed <<<<
Problem: The installer has detected that the PATH environment variable includes other ORACLE_HOME locations in it.
Recommendation: Restart the installer after removing other ORACLE_HOME locations from PATH environment variable.
========================================================
Checking LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variable...
Check complete. The overall result of this check is: Failed <<<<
Problem: The installer has detected that environment variable LD_LIBRARY_PATH includes other ORACLE_HOME locations in it.
Recommendation: Restart the installer after removing other ORACLE_HOME locations from LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variable.
I ran ther pre-req again after unsetting the PATH and HOME variable. But it still gives me a warning on the PATH variable. What should I do to avoid this warning?

If I were you, I would have defined the HOMEs as "/opt/oracle/product/dev/11.1.0" and "/opt/oracle/product/prod/11.1.0" - that would eliminate the errors you are facing. It is still not too late - you can install the prod binaries as "/opt/oracle/product/prod/11.1.0", then later on "clone" the OH from "/opt/oracle/product/11.1.0/dev" to "/opt/oracle/product/dev/11.1.0" and delete the former.
You could also simply clone "/opt/oracle/product/prod/11.1.0" from "/opt/oracle/product/11.1.0/dev" rather than running the the install/patching process all over again.
HTH
Srini

GR while doing Physical inv check

There were around 100 materials were there, for that i have created physcial inventory document using MI31.
It will take another 1 day for me to do GR.
Now in this situation for one of my PO vendor have sent the Goods.
How to do GR immediately in this case. till i complete the doc system wont allow me to post the stock.
suggest me.

Hi,
While creating PI document, the flag "Posting Block" would have been set.
That is why system does not allow any inventory posting.
Goods posting is not to be done until PI is completed.
However, due to any emergency, if it has to be done, then
Go to MI02 (Change PI document) and go to header.
Remove the posting block
Set the Freeze book inventory balance indicator. However, to do this, the config. has to be activated for the S.Loc.
Regards
Prabhu

Erorr while doing the portal postinstallation

Hi
While doing the post installtion activities for portal server
i logged with user administrator
http://hostname:portno/nwa
i have got this error.
Validation Error: Communication with the CMS failed. Ensure that the URL is correct, that the CMS is up an running, and that the given user has administrative access rights for the CMS[ HTTP response "Not Found" from CMS server.
Rao.

Hi
THanks for reply
Just now I started the installtion wat u told to install inthat way i have selected ASJAVA,EP,EPcore only.
Actully my need is i have to give this ep server to development team for ESS/MSS only.
Do i need to install NWDI in developer sytem.
I have some doubt on this .
and can u tell me how to proceed to do configuration for SLD.
I have selected SLD as solution manager while installation of solution manger.
IN ep I selecetd the existing sld as solution manager hostname.
Can u tell me how to configure SLD.
As u told n o need to do any post installation in EP7.0.
Regards
Rao.

While doing comparison using SDK received a warning message

Hi,
While doing comparison using Adobe Acrobat 8 SDK - receiving a warning message "The Organizer database is damaged and will be reset the next time Acrobat is launched. Quit the application and close any currently opened web browsers."
Can any body help me how to rectify the above problem?
Thanks,
Sudhakar
Note: I have reparied the Acrobat professional but still the problem not solved.

Dear Chaka,
If my understanding is correct normally even after setting the TECO status set,you can do confirmations,and you can issue
components against the order.
After technical completion you can still make postings for the order. For instance, material withdrawal or a confirmation can be
posted if they were previously forgotten.
Check this link
http://help.sap.com/saphelperp60_sp/helpdata/en/a3/664a3397e311d1b5a70000e8359890/content.htm_
But generally in order to block the confirmation or goods movement for a TECO status set order,we can either an user Exit or
else block it using the settings in BS22- System status.
But you check this BADI - WORKORDER_UPDATE using the method at save or else withi this REORG_STATUS_ACT_CHECK
Check and revert
Regards
S Mangalraj

Error While Doing GR "Check table YMSEG:"

I am getting following error while doing GR for sales set article 303387.
Check table YMSEG: entry 303384 0001 does not exist
Sales set header 303387
sales set Component 303384 & 303386.
can't find any issue with the article (material) setup

YMSEG is a standard internal table used in import and export of function modules.
if you search SAP notes on YMSEG then you get about 230 hits.
Unfortunately the info given is by far not enough to tell you the reason for this error.
The number from the error explains just that it is one of the sales set Components
But you need to describe the process and what changes you eventually did compared to standard process. Only then we might be able to help you further.

Process Order Warning Message while doing the Goods Receipt

Dear All,
While doing the GR against process order via t.code MB31, we are getting a warning message which reads u201CProduction date of bch 110420 (17.06.2011) does not match the prod. date entered (26.08.2011)u201D this happens only if the batch number already exists in the system for the same material code , in this scenario if the user ignores the warning message & posts the document the existing batch number production date also will be over written with current/inputted manufacturing dateu2026 this will collapse the batch traceability. Is there a way to customize where we can have a different production date for same batch number?..
For example:
Batch Number: ABCD
Production date 10.02.2011
Batch Number: ABCD
Production date 11.02.2011
Batch Number: ABCD
Production date 12.02.2011
Regards,
Sivanandan

I'm sorry to say that I find your requirement to be absolutely not logical; a batch is, by definition, a homogenous quantity of a material, that you want to separate by it's characteristics from other, different, quantities of the same material.
If you decided that manufacturing date is a characteristic of the batch, then it has to be unique for one batch.
So, as I see it, you have two options: either decide that manufacturing date is not important and do without, or have different batches for the different dates.

Auto check number pick while doing the F110

HI All,
Mentioned error message shown while doing the F110.
Check number status at beginning of processing:
My object is to pick the cheque numbers automatically ,while making the payments through F110.
System is not consuming the numbers.
Rgds
Mani Kumar

4 Possibilities -
> Check if you have the RFFOUS_C program defined for the payment method in Country settings - FBZP.
> Check if your variant for RFFOUS_C has the right payment method for printing checks.
> Check if yo have any other proposal for same vendor already created but not finished the payment run for that. It might be due to duplication of entries.
> Check your check-lot. Hope its not exhausted.
Please search forums for more.
Regards,
Zubin

So without warning while surfing with Safari, it will just close? I haven't been able to pin it to a certain action, but it does it regularly . It...

So without warning while surfing with Safari, it will just close? I haven't been able to pin it to a certain action, but it does it regularly .
10 times in last 20 mins Grrrr. updates all up to date.

"...updates all up to date"
Well there you go. There's your mistake. The iOS 8 updates have seriously hosed Safari. Here are your options: (a) you can jump through all kinds of hoops resetting, restoring, reloading, etc. for hours/days, or (b) you can save yourself a lot of aggravation and wait for an update that really "just works".

Status check on MIGO while doing GR from PO

Hi Team,
How to remove/ deactivate status check maintained on MIGO while doing GR from PO
Thanks

Not sure exactly what is causing it but I doubt that this is an SAP problem.
The error message you are getting has only the word TEST in it and the message number starts with a Z. SAP doesn't start their message numbers with Z. It is used for customer objects. This tells me that the message you are seeing is a custom one someone in your company has created and is causing to display. Chances are it is being used in a user exit as part of development. If this is in your production system, I would say you have a problem as a TEST message like that shouldn't show up. It should either be a real message with additional information or it should have been removed before moving to production.
I would have a developer run this in debug. Chances are you'll find a user exit in use that is causing this.
FF

While doing MIGO transaction system showing error: Check table169P the entr

Hi experts,
while doing MIGO transaction system showing error: Check table169P the entry BP01 does not exit.
pls do needful.
Thanks&Regards
sreenivas.p

Hi,
Please specify Whether you are doing Blocking of Invoices or what?
As the T169P is A Parameters Invoice Verification, so you can check the values for T169P table in SE16 so that you will get Clear idea regarding company code BP01 in which the stochastic block is active with Threshold value for stochastic block...
Please check....
For maintaining Entries please go to OMRG maintain Company code and Threshold value as per client requirement so that This will specifies the degree of probability that an invoice is stochastically blocked.
Regards,
Ninad Kshirsagar

Check in chapter ID while doing STO

While doing stock transfer,can a check be put on the chapterID of the material at the stage of making STO or doing vl10b ie system will not allow Stock transfer without chapter ID.
Hitesh Chaturvedi

Hi,
I think , it's not possible
we are controlling in this way.
1.Maintain chapter Ids for all materials which are eligible for Excise.
2.Maintain chapter Ids for new material whenever created, he must inform to excise persons i.e who are maintaining the excise master data.
As It is country specific, no BADI/BAPi available to fulfill this requirement.
Regards

Error while doing Bank determination through FBZP

Hi,
I have copied Company code 0001 for creating my own. Some house bank data also got copied though its allowing me to define new House banks as per my requirement but while doing account determination I am getting the following error:
"Clearing account only allowed for an outgoing bills of exchange payment" Message number F3029.
This is becausse of some config that came with the copy and has "W" payment method and a clearing account is defined for it. I am not even using bills of exchange as a payment method for country IN though its defaulting for my company code and not allowing me to delete it.
I can see the entry in table T042I, I tried deleting it from FBZP but the clearing acct column is greyed out and its not allowing me to delete it and because of this I am unable to do account determination for my house banks.
SM30 is not available for T042I and I am not convinced about deleting it through debugger. I am checking SAP notes but havent found anything on this yet.
Should I change this message from an "error" to a "warning"? How is this done?
Please help me out in resolving this error asap.
Thanks and regards,
Rajat

Hi,
I have copied Company code 0001 for creating my own. Some house bank data also got copied though its allowing me to define new House banks as per my requirement but while doing account determination I am getting the following error:
"Clearing account only allowed for an outgoing bills of exchange payment" Message number F3029.
This is becausse of some config that came with the copy and has "W" payment method and a clearing account is defined for it. I am not even using bills of exchange as a payment method for country IN though its defaulting for my company code and not allowing me to delete it.
I can see the entry in table T042I, I tried deleting it from FBZP but the clearing acct column is greyed out and its not allowing me to delete it and because of this I am unable to do account determination for my house banks.
SM30 is not available for T042I and I am not convinced about deleting it through debugger. I am checking SAP notes but havent found anything on this yet.
Should I change this message from an "error" to a "warning"? How is this done?
Please help me out in resolving this error asap.
Thanks and regards,
Rajat

Issue while doing material posting through Usage Decision

Hi all,
I have an issue while doing material posting through Usage Decision. Please find below the details.
Inspection Lot 10000604689
Material        1730PCPBS.0031
Batch           QP611097      GQ02
Out of total qty of 2100 we need to post the following
To unrestricted use                     2,098
To sample usage                         2
Following error appears,
Deficit of SL Stck.in qual.insp 1,638 NO : 1730PCPBS.0031 62GQ GQ02 QP611097
Message no. M7021
Diagnosis
Shortfall below the specified stock level or quantity amounting to 1,638 NO.
System Response
If the message is an error message (E), the above is not allowed.
If the message is a warning message (W), the system will allow your input, but the warning is intended to prevent you entering a wrong quantity.
Procedure
In the case of a warning message, check the quantity entered.
In the case of an error message, change the quantity or terminate processing.
I have checked that quantity 2100 of material 1730PCPBS.0031 is in QI stock. Kindly advice what is the issue and why we are getting the error?
Regards,
Brijesh

Hi Brijesh,
What is the status of inspection lot?
One of the possibilities I think could be inconsistencies between MM and QM.
Have a look on SAP note 48815- Checking possible inconsistencies between MM and QM.
Regards,
Anand Rao

While doing the goods issue system is thruoghing an erro message no VL621

hi ,
actually while doing the goods issue we had put a validation if that filed(serial number) is not valid.like AVAILABLE then the system has through to an error message.but after that error message system is throughing an nother error.
Risk of posting several mat.documents for one delivery->long text
    Message no. VL621
Diagnosis
    Processing has been terminated because there is the risk that the system
    creates several material documents for this delivery.
Procedure
    If this message occurs frequently, please note the exact situation and
    procedure as well as error messages and inform the system administrator.
and we changed that error to warning also still we are getting that error message.
how to stopthis error message.

hi actually not for serial number check.
there is a Z field in serial number master which is used for SIM number.
that SIM number will be validated with available SIM number from another Z table.
after this SIM error system is throughing this VL621 error after transaction terminated message.

Warning while doing a DB Check on my PRD server

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for