Costcenter issue while posting payroll
Hi
When i am posting payroll i can see the substitute cost center assigned to all my wage type perhaps where i have give the exact master cost center.
can u suggest the problem please i checked with fico but they are saying its prob with hr configuration.
Note : in OM i have assigned master cost center and in in IT 0001 I can see the same but only when i post i am not able to see the master cost center and substitution is getting assigned automatically.
so plz guid me
Thanks
chandu
Execute the payroll once again and simulate the payroll posting. there are two cases:
1. Master has been maintained w/o cost center & actual payroll run. System calls the substitute cost center & will post the document, because you have configured in such a way.
2. Master cost center has been maintained after the payroll execution. So re run the payroll on actual mode, create a new posting document & try to post it. In this case system will call the assigned master cost center.
Just try.
NK
Similar Messages
-
Error while posting payroll results to FI - Documents not getting created
Hi all,
While posting payroll results to FI for Dec 2011 a failure of our Production Server resulted in erroneous posting of payroll
results. Posting run no: 1756 did not get posted at all though the run
status shown was "document posted". The issue was resolved by resorting
to manual posting of entries.
Now we are unable to post payroll results for Jan 2012 for the same
range of employee numbers for whom the manual posting was made for Dec
2011. No posting documents are getting created.
Kindly suggest how to resolve the issue.
Regards,
SunilHi All,
I raised an OSS for the issue. SAP Support provided a solution for the problem. The solution involved cancelling a reversal which we had tried and failed followed by re posting the run no 1756. Our manual entries had to be reversed.The solution is given below.
Please follow these steps:
- Select the posting run 1756
- Menu => Edit => Reversal => Reset after termination
- After last step the status of the posting run should appear as
'documents posted'
- Go to transaction SM13
- Select by user 8273 and date 02.01.2012
- You should see an entry like this:
400 8273 02.01.2012 15:26:57 @07\QEnqueues released@ Error
- Select the entry and press the button 'Single test'
- In case the system shows an error, please send the message back to us
- In case the system shows no errors => press button 'Repeat update'
- Then check in PCP0 and FI is the document has been correctly posted.
Regards
Sunil -
Posting Error - While Posting Payroll
Hi Gurus,
While posting payroll document, system is asking for GL Account, but when we assign HR Clearing Account in "Assign Technical Accounts", then system gives error that business area is missing line item 001 because document splitting is activated in FI.
But ideally should not ask for the GL Account.
Please tell me how can we solve theHello Laxmi Narayan,
Compare the payroll cluster with wage type mentioned in posting run... normally this type of error comes when infotype 9 i.e. Bank Details are not maintained etc.
If helpful please award points
Parag -
Issue while posting the invoice in background using the WF-BATCH user
Hi Friends,
I am facing an issue while posting the invoice in background using the WF-BATCH user. I am using a invoice approval workflow where in when the approver approvers the invoice the invoice document get posted using a background method, which uses BO FIPP and Method POST and i am returning the Message Text to my workflow container from this method. When i see the log an exception is rasied from this method with an error message "V004: You are not authorized to change this document", but WF-BATCH is having SAP_ALL and SAP_NEW authorizations. If i try to post the invoice using the method from my user id it is getting posted. What could be the issue. Please advice.Hi Sapient,
The Parameter, Roles would be different for the LOGIN USER and WF-BATCH.. So ask your administrator
to set the Roles & Parameters similar to that of LOGIN USER to WF-BATCH.
For further refrence check in SU01 giving the LOGIN USER and then check with WF-BATCH... you would
find the difference...
Hope this would help you..
Good luck
Narin -
ALE error while posting payroll data
Hi all,
We are trying to set up payroll posting via ALE interface. We have done the following settings
1. Distribution model setup with filters on for standard bapi's
2. Partner profile setup
3. RFC destination setup
When we try to post payroll data,it was returned with the following errors
RFC destination is not maintained for object BUS6001 and method PRECHECKPAYROLLACCOUNTASSIGN
The account assignment objects could not be checked
RFC destination is not maintained for object BUS6004 and method CHECK
The G/L account could not be checked
We verified RFC destination and it is working fine. I have searched all possible links in SCN, but unable to get the solution.
Can someone help in this issue?Hi,
Using tcode pc_payresult please check whether the off-cycle payroll is executed again in period 06-2010. If yes then try to post off-cycle payroll separately (PC00_M99_CIPE - Create Posting Run) by entering "Off-Cycle Payroll Run" parameters. May be you will get an error while posting this off-cycle payroll because this payroll is already posted. In this case you will have to reverse the existing off-cycle posting and then post off-cycle payroll again.
Once off-cycle payroll is posted, then you try to post normal monthly payroll.
I hope your problem will be solved by doing the above work out.
Regards,
Waqas Rashid -
Error while posting payroll to accounting
Hello,
In a payroll I have two seperate cost centers with different profit centers.
While posting to accounting there is an error "Balancing field profit center not found in line item 001"
Please Help.
Regards
VijayHHI,
Cost center assignment is missing in FICO , Consult FICO consultant for that.
REgards,
Nitin -
Issue while posting message to queue
Hi ,
I am getting following exception while posting message into queue.For every new build I am getting this exception and after 2 or 3 times of restart of corresponding OBPM related weblogic server,Issue is getting resolved
A component failed while executing activity '/COM/OU/UserlProcess#Default-3.0/ComponentExecution[PreProcessor]' (BP-method preProcessor) over instance '/COM/OU/UserlProcess#Default-3.0/15141/0'.
Details:
The task could not be successfully executed.
Reason: 'fuego.connector.ConnectorException: Connector [MAIN_Q:null:JMS] caused an exception when getting a resource of type [7].
Detail:Connector [MAIN_Q:null:JMS] caused an exception when getting a resource of type [7].
Caused by: Connector [MAIN_Q:null:JMS] caused an exception when getting a resource of type [7].
Detail:Connector [MAIN_Q:null:JMS] caused an exception when getting a resource of type [7].
Caused by: Connector [MAIN_Q:null:JMS] returned the wrong class [com.tibco.tibjms.naming.TibjmsConnectionFactoryAttributes] for a resource of type [2].
Detail:Connector [MAIN_Q:null:JMS] returned the wrong class [com.tibco.tibjms.naming.TibjmsConnectionFactoryAttributes] for a resource of type [2].
fuego.lang.ComponentExecutionException: The task could not be successfully executed.
Reason: 'fuego.connector.ConnectorException: Connector [MAIN_Q:null:JMS] caused an exception when getting a resource of type [7].
Detail:Connector [MAIN_Q:null:JMS] caused an exception when getting a resource of type [7].
at fuego.server.execution.EngineExecutionContext.invokeMethodAsCil(EngineExecutionContext.java:1091)
at fuego.server.execution.EngineExecutionContext.runCil(EngineExecutionContext.java:1277)
at fuego.server.execution.microactivity.ComponentExecutionMicroActivity.runCil(ComponentExecutionMicroActivity.java:126)
at fuego.server.execution.microactivity.ComponentExecutionMicroActivity.execute(ComponentExecutionMicroActivity.java:84)
at fuego.server.execution.microactivity.MicroActivityEngineExecutionHandler.executeActivity(MicroActivityEngineExecutionHandler.java:57)
at fuego.server.execution.ImmediateActivity.execute(ImmediateActivity.java:42)
at fuego.server.execution.DefaultEngineExecution$AtomicExecutionTA.runTransaction(DefaultEngineExecution.java:304)
at fuego.transaction.TransactionAction.startNestedTransaction(TransactionAction.java:527)
at fuego.transaction.TransactionAction.startTransaction(TransactionAction.java:548)
at fuego.transaction.TransactionAction.start(TransactionAction.java:212)
at fuego.server.execution.DefaultEngineExecution.executeImmediate(DefaultEngineExecution.java:123)
at fuego.server.execution.DefaultEngineExecution.executeAutomaticWork(DefaultEngineExecution.java:62)
at fuego.server.execution.EngineExecution.executeAutomaticWork(EngineExecution.java:42)
at fuego.server.execution.ToDoItem.executeAutomaticWork(ToDoItem.java:251)
at fuego.ejbengine.ItemExecutionBean$1.execute(ItemExecutionBean.java:217)
at fuego.server.execution.DefaultEngineExecution$AtomicExecutionTA.runTransaction(DefaultEngineExecution.java:304)
at fuego.transaction.TransactionAction.startBaseTransaction(TransactionAction.java:470)
at fuego.transaction.TransactionAction.startTransaction(TransactionAction.java:551)
at fuego.transaction.TransactionAction.start(TransactionAction.java:212)
at fuego.server.execution.DefaultEngineExecution.executeImmediate(DefaultEngineExecution.java:123)
at fuego.server.execution.EngineExecution.executeImmediate(EngineExecution.java:66)
at fuego.ejbengine.ItemExecutionBean.processMessage(ItemExecutionBean.java:203)
at fuego.ejbengine.ItemExecutionBean.onMessage(ItemExecutionBean.java:115)
at weblogic.ejb.container.internal.MDListener.execute(MDListener.java:466)
at weblogic.ejb.container.internal.MDListener.transactionalOnMessage(MDListener.java:371)
at weblogic.ejb.container.internal.MDListener.onMessage(MDListener.java:327)
at weblogic.jms.client.JMSSession.onMessage(JMSSession.java:4123)
at weblogic.jms.client.JMSSession.execute(JMSSession.java:4013)
at weblogic.jms.client.JMSSession$UseForRunnable.run(JMSSession.java:4541)
at weblogic.work.SelfTuningWorkManagerImpl$WorkAdapterImpl.run(SelfTuningWorkManagerImpl.java:464)
at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:200)
at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
Caused by: fuego.connector.ConnectorException: Connector [MAIN_Q:null:JMS] caused an exception when getting a resource of type [7].
Detail:Connector [MAIN_Q:null:JMS] caused an exception when getting a resource of type [7].
at fuego.connector.ConnectorException.exceptionOnGetResource(ConnectorException.java:95)
at fuego.connector.ConnectorTransaction.getResource(ConnectorTransaction.java:324)
at fuego.connector.ConnectorTransaction.getResource(ConnectorTransaction.java:298)
at fuego.connector.JMSHelper.getSession(JMSHelper.java:75)
at fuegoblock.msg.DynamicJMS.sendMessage(DynamicJMS.java:145)
at xobject.Utility.JMSService.writeToAppQueue(JMSService.xcdl:11)
at xobject.Utility.Notification.sendAuditNotification(Notification.xcdl:19)
at XXX.ManualProcess.Default_3_0.Instance.CIL_preProcessor(Instance.xcdl:20)
at XXX.ManualProcess.Default_3_0.Instance.CIL_preProcessor(Instance.xcdl)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
at fuego.server.execution.EngineExecutionContext.invokeMethodAsCil(EngineExecutionContext.java:1082)
... 31 more
Please help how can I resolve this issue
Thanks
SailendraI am also getting the same issue. Sailendra, did you resolve the issue?
If not could anyone help us to resolve this issue.
I am using Tibco JMS for queue and I have set 'ConnectionFactory' as Connection Factory Lookup Name value in the external resourse.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Ramanan -
Document splitting issue while posting MIRO transaction
Hello All
I have a piculiar related to document splitting while posting MIRO entry and this issue started after defaulting the profit center
to the tax gl.
The scenario is like this
While posting a vendor invoice document where there is a difference in the invoice value and stock is allready consumedn
hence system will try to post the difference to the material difference account.
The following is the asccounting entries
01 vendor a/c cr 1000
02 gr/ir a/c dr 800 pc from po document
03 tax g/l 180 default pc
04 inventory diff 20
the error message
system is not able to determine the profit center at line item 04 and message is
Balancing field "Profit Center" in line item 004 not filled
The document splitting settings are all standards related to vendor invoice ..................
One important point to be noted here is that this issue is come after defaulting the profit center at tax gl.
But we cannot remove those default pc also.
Can be their any solution on this
Kindly suggest
ThanksHi
In addition to my previous mail i want to add that
i tried to add even expense item category to splitting rule of business transaction and transaction variant.
Even then it doers not work.
other then is as per standard document splitting rule the expense item category is not included in invoice verication buisness transaction.
Thanks
alok -
Dummy Profit center issue while posting the transaction in FB60
Dear SAP friends,
We have implemented ECC6.0 version,
I have the below issue:
I am posting the document in FB60 transaction: after simulating the document system is throwing the error "Profit center 9937/FIREPRODMY does not exist for 14.08.2009"
Message no. KM700
Document spilitting active at Business area level..
In 0KE5( maintain controlling area settings) I have not given the Dummy profit center.
Eventhough it is asking for Dummy profit center while posting, Please let me know apart from the 0Ke5 settings do i need to remove the dummy profit center anywhere in the Config.
I have not maintained any settings in FAGL3KEH, 3KEH and OKB9.
No sunstitutions are active in the system.
Please let me know from where i need to remove the dummy profit center.
My client going live on 17th Aug 2009.
Regards,
AnandHi,
Check the validity period of the Profit Center 9937/FIREPRODMY. The valid from period should have the date same or earlier than 14.08.2009
If not then change the profit center master data to be valid from an earlier date (Tcode KE52). Steps-
KE52 - Profit Center FIREPRODMY
Click Change Validity Period (Ctrl +F1)
Valid from - put a date earlier or equal to 14.08.2009
Click Activate (Shift + F1)
Thanks, -
Issue while posting billing doc to account
Hi All,
There is an inssue with an inbound idoc, actually when an inbound idoc is recieved, sales order is created automatically, but while posting the billing document to account it shows an error, pricing error in item, and when we check the the data in idoc we are getting it selects the wrong Relational owener id which are not maintained, so i need to find out in which exit i can the logic for that please help me.
The error is not consistent , sometime it works and sometime does not.
see the below
''When we change this Relational Owner from ‘F’ to ‘J’, they are able to posting their accounts. I want to know from where this ‘F’ is getting populated because we didn’t maintain ‘F’ anywhere. Need to know from where –F is getting populated in the sales order''.
Thanks
IkHello Khan ,
You need to solve this issue on your own by debugging. I suggest you to set a watch point on the filed i,e variable-name = '-F' to know how it is being populated.
Thanks -
Dealer Excise Invoice-Issue while posting MIRO
Dear All,
Today i was doing Domestic procurement with Dealer for Gas Cylinder. In PO we entered total value which includes Excise amount also (1000+103)& VAT @ 14% (154,42).
While doing GR i selected as Only captured excise inv, checked MRP indicator.
Changed the bse value to 1000, entered BED as 100, E Cess as 2 & SEcess as 1.
The accounting entries were correct, Inventory is posting with Rs 1000
Posted excise invoice in J1IEX, the values were coming from GR, its correct and the acc entries were also OK with 103 Cenvat clearing acc Cr & Excise acc Dr.
While posting MIRO, I am facing problems...
In line item i am getting as 1103 Base value...
VAT is calculating on (1103+103) @ 14% 168.84,
so total value is 1271.84
When i simulate, its showing
Vendor 1271.84 Cr
GR/IR clg acc 1000 Dr
Material 103 Dr
VAT 168,84 Dr
There is no cenvat clearing account here
Please help me how to resolve this.
Regds,
CB
When i simulateHi,
have you mainatin 100% setoof condition check it it should be there
check MIRo posting date and excise invoice posting date
check condition record validity in FV13
Regards
Kailas Ugale
Edited by: kailasugale on Feb 10, 2012 12:01 PM -
Error while posting payroll results to FI -IN PY
Dear Consultants,
When I am posting Payroll results to FI I am able to see the + amount and - amount is equal still it giving error and when I check PCP0 it says incorrect document generated. Please do needful.
Error message: Error in document: HRPAY 0000000094 DEVCLNT200
Error in document: HRPAY 0000000094 DEVCLNT200
Message no. RW609
Diagnosis
Errors occurred when checking or posting the document
Reference type = HRPAY
Reference key = 0000000094
Logical system = DEVCLNT200
You can find the errors in the log.
System Response
The document cannot be posted.
Procedure
Remove the error in the document and create and post the document again.
Second error message : Posting period 012 2012 is not open
Message Text
Posting period 012 2012 is not open
Technical Data
Message type__________
E (Error)
Message class_________
F5 (Document Editing)
Message number________
201
Message variable 1____
012
Message variable 2____
2012
Message variable 3____
+
Message variable 4____
COSM
Message Attributes
Level of detail_______
2 (Level of detail 2)
Problem class_________
Sort criterion________
Number________________
1
Environment Information
Item__________________
000
Please do needful, why this error is coming even though the +and - amount are equal.
Regards,
Naresh.KMDear Siva,
Sorry for delay in reply, as per my understanding I have done the assignment correctly, and the same arrears are coming in RT table as well as in payslip. When I checked the report RPDKON00 I have got a list of wage types assigned to GL account under Country grouping 40,
A.Define wage type posting characteristics : I have copied arrears, carryforward wage types from their original wage types.
Example : From Basic pay (which is using in infotype 0008) I have copied Basic arrear wage type and basic carryforward wage type. and assigned the same in ZN42, ZN43, ZN44 and did the assignment.
B. Define symbolic account : I have copied the symbolic account which is assigned to Basic wage type and copied the same and created new symbolic account and assigned to only basic arrear wage type which is coming in RT table.
C .Assigned wage type to symbolic account : I have not assigned arrear wage type symbolic account to Original wge type in V_T53EL. Only Basic wage type symbolic account is mapped here.
D Mapping symbolic account to G/L account : I have assigned the arrear wage type Symbolic account to the same GL which is assigned to original Basic wage type symbolic account.
I have followed the same process for all the arrear wage types, and even the report RPDKON00 it is showing the same there is no error message.
Apart from that I have created a New Symbolic account for /ZF5 and did all assignment, and assigned /ZF5 wage type symbolic account to /3F1 wage type symbolic account and GL mapping also same as /3F1.
In Standard /552 arrear process there is no /ZF5 postings it will directly deduct the amount.
Please suggest do I need to check any other area or how can I solve this error. kindly do needful.
Regards,
Naresh.KM -
SAP HUM Issue while Posting TO.
Hi There,
I have issue while doing picking for HUM with Nested HU.
Scenario :
- We have Nested HU with 11 Box packed on it. (10 Box Batch A + 1 Box Batch B).
- I have an outbound delivery for 1 material with split batch. (Batch A and Batch B). while doing picking against outbound delivery, i created a TO. System did proposed me a Nested HU for picking. I created a Pick HU by LH01 as well to repack what i want to pick. All worked fine till now.
- Now I want to pick 1 box of Batch A and 1 Box of Batch B.
- I can not do that. I am keep getting error i do not have enough material on nested HU, how ever i do!!!
- IFFFF,
I do have only 1 Batch to pick ( NO Split delivery), from same Nested HU, i can always pick 1 box. Either Batch A or Batch B with full QTY. I only get error for Batch split scenario for picking.
Can any one help me on that?
Smit.You should debug your program and see where exactly and what causes this behavior.
In this way you will have a cause of the issue and could be able to retrace it back to the root cause of the problem.
Just one more thing to clarify... Your TO is created and the system did propose your nested HU for picking but when you pick from it, you get the error message?
Can you please write the exact error message number and description? -
Issue while posting physical inventory document
Hi Team,
While posting a physical inventory document system is giving error message saying that
HU exists at another point in the warehouse. Clear the HU first
Message no. /SCWM/GM751
here is my scenario: As per the system bin is empty, while doing physical inventory we found and counted one HU in the same bin. while posting the same physical inventory document we are getting the above error message. as per the system this HU available in some other bin.
could you please let us know is there any process which i am missing before posting the PI document.
while posting the PI document is it not possible automatically HU get move from one bin to other bin?
Thanks
MastanHi kmastanrao
All above suggestion given need to check.
1. Check HU available in WH. In EWM monitor and HU details.
And after finding the status of HU and use as you need in your process.
second if needed I can provide HU table in EWM which can be used.
Regards
Suraj -
Hello ,
While execute posting run Payroll . i am getting the error bellow,
Posting balance is not cleared (Period 05 / 2007 A)
Message no. 3G103
Diagnosis
The employee has been rejected because the balance of the generated posting items has not been balanced.
Procedure
Check the Customizing steps for the posting characteristics for the wage types that exist in the corresponding payroll result.
Thanks & AdvanceHello Laxmi Narayan,
Compare the payroll cluster with wage type mentioned in posting run... normally this type of error comes when infotype 9 i.e. Bank Details are not maintained etc.
If helpful please award points
Parag
Maybe you are looking for
-
To check ink levels I am told to print self test. page from cpu or printer.
There is no way to print a test page on my" psc 2410 all in one" connected to a HP cpu with Win 7, 64 bit. Is there a workaround/
-
I cannot play any of my previously purchased iTunes songs/albums on my iPhone 5. The songs are listed as downloaded, but when I go to play them, the 'play' screen appears for about 2 seconds, and then disappears. I have followed all the steps I can f
-
What settings to use to burn DVD?
After several attempts, I have not been able to burn a DVD that will play on any of our DVD players. They will, however, play on our 2 laptops. I have read the user guide, watched the PrE tutorials, and Steve Grisetti's video and I am still confuse
-
I get the following error message on my desktop screen almost daily--"This Mac cannot connect to iCloud because of a problem with [email protected] (my Apple ID)" Open system preferences to fix this problem". I open preferences and nothing seems to b
-
Netegrity - Portal 7 integration
I have a requirement where the WLP 7 is behind a Netergrity SSO enabled IPlanet WebServer. Need to automatically log the users in to WLP 7. BEA Portal support mentioned CCE has developed a beta BEA supported integration between WLP 7.0 and Siteminder