Delivery Costs Entries(BEWTP = F/G/I/M) related to PO in EKBE

Hello..
I am new to MM and i have been checking the values of BEWTP field in EKBE.
I could see the following values related to Delivery Costs.
BEWTP = F / G / I / M
Can any one tell me what does each stands for and How can i get an entry in EKBE for each of the above type?
any help/input is really appreciated.
Thanks,
lt

Hi,
   The description for the PO history category can be found from table T163B.
   The delivery cost related PO history will be updated in EKBZ table, not in EKBE.
   The PO history category depends on the condition category used against the delivery cost condition type.
1. If the condition category is B (Delivery Cost) for the delivery cost condition type (in M/06), then the delivery cost history will be updated as below:
During GR (EKBZ-VGABE =1),, EKBZ - BEWTP = F
During IR (EKBZ-VGABE =2), EKBZ - BEWTP = M and or EKBZ - BWTYP = K , if its account assigned PO.
2. If the condition category is blank or F (Delivery Cost) for the delivery cost condition type (in M/06), then the delivery cost history will be updated as below:
During GR (EKBZ-VGABE =1), EKBZ - BEWTP = C
During IR (EKBZ-VGABE =2), no entry in EKBZ
Regards,
AKPT

Similar Messages

How do I confirm which delivery cost of MIRO has done or not?

Dear SAP Guru,
Please give me suggestion, how do I know which delivery cost has completed the Invoice Verification or not.
Thanks
Shoyeb

Dear,
I would suggest you to use table EKBZ "History per Purchasing Document: Delivery Costs"
This table stores all the data related to delivery cost which we have mentioned in PO (i.e GR,MIRO etc)
Say in your PO for a line item you have 3 freight charges (FRA1,FRB1,FRC1)
So when you perform MIGO -> EKAB table will store those 3 freight charges along with the condition type with amount
Similarly when you perform MIRO for these costs it will create entries for those as well
So by entering the PO no and item no you can easily compare for which costs MIRO is pending
In EKBZ table use EBELN (Po no.) EBELP (Po item no ) and ZAEHK (Counter ) and find for which lines
VGABE =1 is there but VGABE =2 not there
{VGABE = 1 MIGO (I.e goods recept) 2 = MIRO (Invoice receipt) and KSCHL = Condition type (FRB1)}
Like this you can get the list of the Pending delivery cost for MIRO
Edited by: redriver on Jan 3, 2012 9:30 AM

How delivery costs will hit after service entry ?

Dear gurus ,
I have a issue that i mention below :
Please find below screen shot :
1st screen the delivery cost is showing, but in the 2nd screen delivery cost is not showing.
screen shot 1 : http://lh5.ggpht.com/_w387jXfUKEE/TKG3PH9_y5I/AAAAAAAAG_g/PlLuWO8joiA/s800/28-09-2010%204-34-07%20PM.png
screen shot 2: http://lh5.ggpht.com/_w387jXfUKEE/TKG3POrH55I/AAAAAAAAG_c/xfgd2JR3H1I/28-09-2010%204-35-17%20PM.png
Kindly guide, how the delivery costs will hit after service entry.
Could you please give me some info ?
Thanks & Regards
Edited by: the_gadfly on Sep 28, 2010 11:51 AM

Hi Shashidhar ,
Set the indicator against ur Mvt Type and try it.
SproMaterials ManagementInventory Management and Physical InventoryGoods ReceiptFor GR-Based IV, Reversal of GR Despite Invoice
Regards
Ramesh Ch

Bapi to post planned delivery cost of a purchase order

Hi every body,
         Can anybody please give me the full details of the planned delivery cost data
to post with BAPI_INCOMINGINVOICE_CREATE
what are the manditory fields,
I am using the following code , but a few are posting , remaining r not posting
but when I post the same through MIRO it is posted what is difference
this error was came
ERROR: enter good reciept data only when working with GR-based IV
REPORT ZBAPI_MIRO                              .
tables: ekko,ekbe,ekpo,lfa1,EKBZ,t000.
data: itemdata like BAPI_INCINV_CREATE_ITEM occurs 0 with header line,
headerdata like BAPI_INCINV_CREATE_HEADER occurs 0 with header line,
     return like BAPIRET2 occurs 0 with header line,
     DOC_NO LIKE BAPI_INCINV_FLD-INV_DOC_NO,
     FISC_YEAR LIKE BAPI_INCINV_FLD-FISC_YEAR.
DATA:error_flag.
data: item_data like EK08BN occurs 0 with header line.
data: begin of itab occurs 0,
             p_order like ekpo-ebeln,
             p_item like ekpo-ebelp,
             p_ctype like konv-kschl,
             p_lifnr like lfa1-lifnr,
      end of itab.
data: order(10) type N,
      vendor(10) type N.
data: begin of it_doc occurs 0,
            DOC_NO LIKE BAPI_INCINV_FLD-INV_DOC_NO,
            p_order like ekko-ebeln,
      end of it_doc.
PARAMETERS: fn LIKE rlgrap-filename OBLIGATORY.
DATA: FN1 TYPE STRING,
     l .
AT SELECTION-SCREEN ON VALUE-REQUEST FOR fn. "p_file.
CALL FUNCTION 'F4_FILENAME'
       EXPORTING
            field_name = 'FN'
       IMPORTING
            file_name = fn.
START-OF-SELECTION.
   FN1 = FN.
PERFORM upload.
loop at itab.
CLEAR: EKBZ,EKPO,LFA1,ITEM_DATA,HEADERDATA,itemdata.
REFRESH:itemdata,HEADERDATA,ITEM_DATA.
order = itab-p_order.
itab-p_order = order.
vendor = itab-P_lifnr.
itab-p_lifnr = vendor.
select single * from ekbz where ebeln = order
                           and ebelp = itab-p_item
                          and kschl = itab-p_ctype
                          and bewtp = 'F'.
select single * from ekpo where ebeln = order
                       and ebelp = itab-p_item.
SELECT SINGLE * FROM LFA1 WHERE LIFNR = vendor.
clear: item_data.
refresh:item_data.
call function 'ME_READ_COND_INVOICE'
   exporting
   I_BUDAT            =
    I_EBELN            = itab-p_order
    I_EBELP            = itab-p_item
   I_FRBNR            = ' '
     i_lifnr            = ' '
   I_XBLNR            = ' '
   RE_KURSF           =
   RE_WAERS           =
   I_RESWK            = ' '
   I_EKKI             = 'X'
   I_BUBIS            =
   RE_WWERT           =
   XEK08B_FLAG        =
   I_BELNR            =
   I_BUZEI            =
   I_READ_KRUEK       = ' '
   I_DISPLAY          = ' '
TABLES
    XEK08BN            = item_data
   XEK08BN_CURR       =
read table item_data with key kschl = itab-P_ctype.
headerdata-INVOICE_IND = 'X'.
headerdata-DOC_TYPE = 'KR'.
headerdata-DOC_DATE = ekbz-budat.
headerdata-PSTNG_DATE = SY-DATUM.
headerdata-REF_DOC_NO = itab-P_ORDER.
headerdata-COMP_CODE = 'HPL'.
headerdata-DIFF_INV = itab-p_lifnr.
headerdata-CURRENCY_ISO = ekbz-waers.
headerdata-GROSS_AMOUNT = item_data-WEWWR - item_data-AREWR .
headerdata-BLINE_DATE = SY-DATUM.
headerdata-DEL_COSTS_TAXC = 'V0'.
headerdata-PO_REF_NO = itab-P_ORDER.
headerdata-bus_area = 'OTHR'.
headerdata-ITEM_TEXT = LFA1-NAME1.
*headerdata-HEADER_TXT = .
headerdata-ALLOC_NMBR = itab-P_ORDER.
APPEND HEADERDATA.
CLEAR HEADERDATA.
itemdata-INVOICE_DOC_ITEM = '00001' .
itemdata-PO_NUMBER = itab-P_ORDER.
itemdata-PO_ITEM = itab-P_ITEM.
*itemdata-REF_DOC = ekbz-belnr.
itemdata-REF_DOC_YEAR = ekbz-gjahr.
itemdata-REF_DOC_IT = itab-P_ITEM.
itemdata-TAX_CODE = 'V0'.
itemdata-ITEM_AMOUNT = item_data-WEWWR - item_data-AREWR .
itemdata-QUANTITY = item_data-BPWEM - item_data-BPREM .
itemdata-PO_UNIT = ekpo-meins.
itemdata-PO_PR_UOM = ekpo-meins.
itemdata-COND_TYPE = itab-P_CTYPE.
*itemdata-ITEM_TEXT = .
append itemdata.
clear itemdata.
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_INCOMINGINVOICE_CREATE'
EXPORTING
    HEADERDATA       = HEADERDATA
IMPORTING
    INVOICEDOCNUMBER = DOC_NO
    FISCALYEAR       = FISC_YEAR
TABLES
    ITEMDATA         = ITEMDATA
   ACCOUNTINGDATA   = I_ACCOUNTINGDATA
   TAXDATA          = I_TAX
    RETURN           = RETURN.
if sy-subrc <> 0.
message e999(re) with 'Problem occured'.
else.
loop at return.
    if not return is initial.
     clear bapi_retn_info.
     move-corresponding return to bapi_retn_info.
      if return-type = 'A' or return-type = 'E'.
        error_flag = 'X'.
      endif.
     append bapi_retn_info.
    endif.
endloop.
if error_flag = 'X'.
   message e999(re) with 'Problem occured'.
    rollback work.
else.
      Return Table from BAPI call is empty
    CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'
      EXPORTING
        WAIT   = 'X'
      IMPORTING
        RETURN = RETURN.
endif.
endif.
       write:/ 'Document no :', doc_no.
       it_doc-doc_no = doc_no.
       it_doc-p_order = itab-p_order.
       append it_doc.
       CLEAR IT_DOC.
endloop.
loop at it_doc.
   if it_doc-doc_no = ' '.
      write:/ 'purchase order not posted ' , it_doc-p_order.
   else.
   write:/ 'document no:' , it_doc-doc_no, 'p.order:' , it_doc-p_order.
endif.
endloop.
*&      Form upload
      text
--> p1        text
<-- p2        text
form upload .
CALL function 'GUI_UPLOAD'
exporting
    filename                      = FN1
   FILETYPE                      = 'ASC'
HAS_FIELD_SEPARATOR           = ' '
HEADER_LENGTH                 = 0
READ_BY_LINE                  = 'X'
DAT_MODE                      = ' '
CODEPAGE                      = ' '
IGNORE_CERR                   = ABAP_TRUE
REPLACEMENT                   = '#'
CHECK_BOM                     = ' '
NO_AUTH_CHECK                 = ' '
IMPORTING
FILELENGTH                    =
HEADER                        =
tables
    data_tab                      = ITAB
EXCEPTIONS
FILE_OPEN_ERROR               = 1
FILE_READ_ERROR               = 2
NO_BATCH                      = 3
GUI_REFUSE_FILETRANSFER       = 4
INVALID_TYPE                  = 5
NO_AUTHORITY                  = 6
UNKNOWN_ERROR                 = 7
BAD_DATA_FORMAT               = 8
HEADER_NOT_ALLOWED            = 9
SEPARATOR_NOT_ALLOWED         = 10
HEADER_TOO_LONG               = 11
UNKNOWN_DP_ERROR              = 12
ACCESS_DENIED                 = 13
DP_OUT_OF_MEMORY              = 14
DISK_FULL                     = 15
DP_TIMEOUT                    = 16
OTHERS                        = 17
endform.                    " upload

I think you need to implement user-exit EXIT_SAPMM06E_012 of enhancement MM06E005.
Look in OSS with seach term MM06E005 to get some examples.
Note310154 "ME21N/ME51N: Customer-specific check, generating error log" has some examples.
You should use the macros to set errors/warnings
Example:
mmpur_business_obj_id pt_ekpo-id.
mmpur_metafield mmmfd_partners.
mmpur_message_forced 'W' '00' '208' text-001 '' '' ''.
regards,
JG

Planned Delivery Cost in MIRO for different freight vendor

Hi,
Kindly share, how to get rid of above issue:
1) PO created with a freight condition (FRA1 with a different vendor assigned to it under item conditions tab)
2) GR done, & all accounting entries were OK, (including freight costs in FR1 or FR3)
3) while doing MIRO with selection Planned-Delivery-Cost, Amount & Qty fields are "Blank" and auto flowing from Clearing A/cs
I found this error in both Domestic or Import POs.
I've read many threads, but could not find a clear solutions for the same.
Plz help
Sankar

Hi,
Plz find screens.
Amount & Qty fields not flowing in MIRO from open GRIR/clearing account balance.

VI01 as delivery costs in MIGO

Hi all,
We have to change de Automatic PO generated in Shipment costs for Shipment costs as delivery costs during goods receipt.
We have applied de SAP Note 427944.
. M/06
Condition type: 'B' delivery costs (T685A-KNTYP field)
Accrual: 'X' (T685A-KRUEK field)
Copy shp.costs: 'X' (T685A-BNKTK field)
. Entries in the calculation schema: (IMG -> Materials Management -> Purchasing -> Conditions -> Define Price- Determination Process -> Define Calculation Schema)
In the calculation schema, an
1. Account key (T683S-KVSL1 field)
2. Account key - accruals/provisions (Field T683S-KVSL2)
must be specified for the corresponding condition type (similar to the FRB1 condition type in schema RM0000). Note that this condition is always marked as 'statistical' in the condition screen of the purchase order regardless of the settings in the price schema because it is an accrual.
. Purchase order: The condition type should not be valuated in the purchase order item, that is, the condition value is 0.
. Shipment status: The overall status of the shipment cost calculation for all affected
shipments must be 'C' (that is, complete).
Calculated      C Fully calculated
Assigned        C Account assignment fully completed
Transferred     C transferred
. In T_56 the
u201D Rate of Automatic Processingu201D V_TVFTK-PRZST is D Release shipment cost item
If u201CRelevant for settlementu201D V_TVFT-ABREL is A relevant for settlement (delivery costs) them the status are only
Calculated      C Fully calculated     but in MIGO there is no ACCOUNTING OF THE DELIVERY COSTS
If u201CRelevant for settlementu201D V_TVFT-ABREL is X relevant for settlement (G/L account) them the status are
Calculated      C Fully calculated
Assigned        C Account assignment fully completed
Transferred     A Not transferred   and in MIGO there is no ACCOUNTING OF THE DELIVERY COSTS
The process is :
ME21N
VL31N
VT02N (automatically)
VI01 (no PO automatically as before)
MIGO material GR for the inbound delivery of VL31N AND accounting of the delivery costs. THE ACCOUNTING OF THE DELIVERY COSTS is missing why??
Someone can help?
Cheers
marta

Hi,
Just to clarify my questions. In the note 427944 explain that
1 . Shipment status: The overall status of the shipment cost calculation for all affected shipments must be 'C' (that is, complete).
*It means that the 3 status must be : Calculated C Fully calculated + Assigned C Account assignment fully completed + Transferred C transferred ?*
Other thing:
2 *. In T_56 the u201D Rate of Automatic Processingu201D V_TVFTK-PRZST must be D Release shipment cost item?*
3. In T_56 If u201CRelevant for settlementu201D V_TVFT-ABREL is A relevant for settlement (delivery costs) them the status showed in VI01 are only Calculated C Fully calculated b
If u201CRelevant for settlementu201D V_TVFT-ABREL is X relevant for settlement (G/L account) them in VI01 the status are Calculated C Fully calculated /Assigned C Account assignment fully completed / Transferred A Not transferred. *Why I can not do the transfer?*
as is Transferred A Not transferred them in MIGO there is no ACCOUNTING OF THE DELIVERY COSTS.
Could you help me with one of these three questions?
Thank you very much,
marta

LE-TRA Shipment costs as inbound delivery costs, goods receipt

Hello gurus:
We are facing the following scenario, regarding inbound transportation.
We plan our shipment document and shipment costs, and they feature several items. Each of those items represent a shipping service, which in certain cases be taken on different countries by the same service agent.
That is, we have a service X on country A, with tax indicator 1, and service Y on country B, with tax indicator 2.
Both services would need to be transferred as delivery costs to the purchase order.
According to note 427944, shipment cost value is cumulated by service agent., so that it looks impossible to get the values broken up to the purchase order, which would be the first step to subsequently get the right tax indicators for each item of the shipment.
Even using different condition types on the shipment cost document, system cumulates by service agent and transfers to the first condition found on the purchase order schema.
Has any of you faced similar issue? Any workaround possible?.
Thanks in advance for your valuable help.
David Ramos.
PORCELANOSA MM.
This is the section of note 427944 that indicates the treatment of the shipment costs in the purchase order,
Transfer the shipment costs into the condition types of the purchase order:
The shipment cost value (without tax amounts) is cumulated for all relevant shipment cost documents
for each service agent and transferred to a corresponding condition type of the purchase order item.
Before cumulation, the amounts are first converted into the purchase order currency.
1. A transfer of the values for each condition type (similar to the transfer from a shipment
cost document to the SD billing document) is not supported.
2. If different service agents exist in the shipment cost documents, a corresponding number of
condition lines (with value 0) must be specified in the purchase order item. These can always
belong to the same condition type (in schema 'Manual') or also to different condition types (not
'Manual'):
a) Manual condition lines: If the condition type in the schema of the purchase order is
marked as 'manual', the condition type must be created (with value 0) in the purchase order
item before the goods receipt. If delivery costs are expected from different service agents,
several non-valuated entries must be generated for this condition type. If more condition
lines exist than required, these are then no longer taken into account. If condition lines
are missing, the last service agents are not settled.
- Advantage: You only have to define one condition type for the delivery costs.
- Disadvantage: Each purchase order must be processed manually before the goods receipt.
b) Automatic condition lines: If the condition lines are to be generated automatically for
the delivery costs (the condition type is not flagged as 'Manual' in the schema), the schema
must have enough condition types to settle several service agents. If more condition lines
exist than required, these are then no longer taken into account. If condition lines are
missing, the last service agents are not settled.
- Advantage: The goods receipt can be carried out without manual preparation beforehand in
the purchase order.
- Disadvantage: You must define identical condition types with different names.
Message was edited by: PORCELANOSA MM

Hi,
If you refereed the OSS Note 427944 correctly it explains how the shipment cost can be transferred to delivery cost based on some pre-requisite.
Like the value for PO should be >0
Like the service agent is involved during shipment liability, then there should be cumulative transfer for each value which will update based on shipment cost if PO value is "0".
The shipment cost will be delivered to all delivery items based on weight.
If you want to enhance this then you need to use the enhancement V54KSFRC to update the values as per your requirement.
Rgds,

Unplanned delivery cost for different Vendor

Hi,
For a import PO we need to pay OCTOI to Municipal corporation.
Unfortunately while PO creation the octroi condition was not entered.
Now we need to post a invoice for this and the condition is, we must post this to material.
We dont want to do direct FI entry as then this will not load on material.
Entring Unplanned delivery cost at the time of invoice will not be possible is the Vendor is different.
Any suggestions please...
Rajesh

Dear Rajesh,
unplanned delivery cost is basically which not plan at the time of PO and it will be expected at the time of invoice.
you can enter extra amount in unplanned delivery cost, but check at the time of Stimulate which a/c is being captured.
The Unplanned Delivery cost is default in separate GL or in Stock Account depends upon the configuration.
check In SPRO ,Maintain settings as shown
MM---> Logistic Invoice Verification -->Incoming Invoice --> Configure How unplanned delivery costs are posted
Please check the below link for more information
http://www.sap-img.com/financial/unplanned-and-plan-delivery-costs-in-stock-and-gl-account.htm
Unplanned delivery costs in MIRO
Regards,
PK.

Change the sequence of planned delivery costs in MIRO

Dear Experts,
In import an import PO the various CVD & ACD conditions are maintained in the PO .
To enter the bill of entry , MIRO is used where the invoice is booked for planned delivery costs for the PO .
In MIRO , this planned delivery costs appear by default in certain sequence. I want to change this sequence .
eg by default the system shows :
Sec Ed cess on CVD
ACD
BCD
Ed cess on BCD
CVD
Ed cess on CVD
Sec Ed Cess on BCD
I want to change the seq of appearance in MIRO.
How is it possible
Pls guide
Regards
Anis

Dear Anis bazmi
You will get the conditions as you desire one below another in PO or MIRO if you have defined them exctly the same way in your calculation schema steps, other wise there is no way in getting the way you want and it can not be changed either in PO stage or in MIRO also.
Just check, when you are processing MIRO, please select Planned delivery Costs form the menu below instead of the combination of both.
Regards

How to return Delivery Costs in a PO?

Hi everyone,
My client has a scenario of vendor return with PO, where we indicate that the PO item is a return item.
The situation I am facing is the following: we create a normal PO, where items have their price + delivery costs. MIGO and MIRO are done perfectly. My problem comes when we have to create a return PO for that item. I do not have the same provision for PO returns, because when we return the item through PO indicator delivery costs can not be included as SAP does not support negative delivery costs. The thing is that returning the item at Purchase Price without consideration of the deliver costs, will result in high WAC. How to resolve this issue.
Could anyone advise on this? Thanks in advance!
Nisha

Hi Nisha,
I have run the scenerio in my test system with return PO.
In this I have considered the net price to be 10 rs out of which .50 rs is frieght (condition type is marked with accrual/statstical in config)
i was able to create PO since the condition type value is coming in positive and its statastical and on doing mIGO system created the material document with the below accounting entries
GR/IR dr for 10 Rs
Stock account credit for 9.5 rs
Frieght account credit for .5 rs
I think this solves the issue
please check the config of the frieght condition type make it statastical

Conditions type of category "Delivery Costs"(B) donu00B4t allow negative values

Hello,
I would like to know if it is possible to munipulate a condition type with category "B" Delivery costs in such a way that it allows a negative entry in the Purchase Order.
Estandard SAP does not allow it. Message: 06259 "Negative Delivery costs are not allowed".
If the above is not possible, can anyone tell me how a can manipulate a Discount (fixed amount) in such a way that it not only points at a particlar account (accruels indicator does this job) upon MIGO, but also apears as a line-item upon receiving the invoice (MIRO). As far as I know, only Planned delivery costs can do this job. But they do not allow negative values!
If anyone has encountered a similar task, please tell me how they solved it.
Thanks,
Aart

Hello Guys,
The scenario isas follows.
When one buys fuel, in Chile one has to pay fuel especific Taxes.
Version especific config does not resolve this because we need the tax in amount (value) not in percentage.
In our system we resolved this by creating a material "Fuel especific Taxes" which points at a tax-account with a special tax-indicator.
So far so good.
Now the government implemented a second fuel tax - "Fuel tax variable" which we might resolve in the same way, but the problem is this tax might be negative(!).
We cannot create a material with a "negative value" in our Purchase Order and discount conditions have inmediate efect on the material costs in the PO.
The ideal would be incorporate a condition type in the PO which upon invoicing (MIRO) shows up with the tax account (and a possible negative value!
The model we have developed upto now is using the tabpage "GeneralAccount" in the MIRO but in this model we have to indicate the account ourselves. The system does not propose it.
Thats why I thought of the "Planned Delivery costs" option.
Hope this clarifies a bit more the case we have.
Thanks for any feedback
Aart

Delivery costs not reversed in GR reversal

Hi,
I have a situation where in PO following conditions are used-
ZR0 - (100) USD - Statistical - Accrual - Discount/Surcharge type
ZR2 - (100) USD - Statistical - Accrual - Discount/Surcharge type - Delivery cost - (100% of ZR0)
ZR3 - (-100) USD - Statistical - Accrual - Discount/Surcharge type - (-100% of ZR0)
When I post the GR, the following entries are posted-
148000    CAInv NonTradStock S   30,421.60 AUD
311700    CLPbls GR-IR Clearin   64,991.68- AUD
629935    Std-Actual Price Var   34,570.08 AUD
611900    Purchasing (FG)        64,991.68 AUD
611910    Purchase offset (FG)   64,991.68- AUD
311700    CLPbls GR-IR Clearin   14,504.64- AUD (ZR0)
120240    CARecv Sundry-Extern   14,504.64 AUD
311700    CLPbls GR-IR Clearin   14,504.64 AUD (ZR2)
311700    CLPbls GR-IR Clearin   14,504.64- AUD (ZR3)
But when I reverse the GR, the following entries only are posted-
99 148000    CAInv NonTradStock S   32,653.56- AUD
86 311700    CLPbls GR-IR Clearin   64,991.68 AUD
96 629935    Std-Actual Price Var   32,338.12- AUD
50 611900    Purchasing (FG)        64,991.68- AUD
40 611910    Purchase offset (FG)   64,991.68 AUD
Can you please let me know why the ZR0/ZR2/ZR3 cond are not reversed in the 102 movement?

Hello Jurgen,
I am cancelling the initial material document (101) with MIGO - 102.
When I check the accounting documents:
For the 101:
001 89       311010     STK RAW MAT                                   18,219.00
002 96       408111     UNVOUCH A/P RAW MAT                           11,489.81-
003 86       601120     PURCHASES RAW MAT (O                             548.57
004 50       408113     UNVOUCH A/P TRANSP                             6,384.00-
005 50       408113     UNVOUCH A/P TRANSP                               893.76-
For the 102:
Itm PK BusA Acct no.   Description                    Tx     Amount in   USD
001 99       311010     STK RAW MAT                                   18,219.00-
002 86       408111     UNVOUCH A/P RAW MAT                           11,489.81
003 86       601120     PURCHASES RAW MAT (O                             345.19
004 40       408113     UNVOUCH A/P TRANSP                             6,384.00
There were several goods receipts between 101 and 102 (but no invoicing) because this is an automated flow with EDI.
The PO has 2 freight condition types:
FRC1 (freight/qty) with vendor A in the details of the conditions on the PO
FRA3 (freight %) with vendor B in the details of the conditions on the PO
For different reasons, the pricing is maintained in MEK1 (not in an info-record).
Thanks for your help,
Annabelle R.

Delivery costs in stock transport order

Dear SAP experts,
We want to add certain delivery cost in the stock transport order.
We create a new pricing schema with 3 delivery cost conditions "Z" conditions. The new pricing schema is assigned to the stock transport order doc type.
In transaction code me27, when the try tp enter the delivery cost conditions by clicking on the conditions icon, system given an error message saying that "Function not possible for this item". Message No. 06096.
Pricing is as follows -
STKP - Stock transfer price
Z001    10% on STKP
Z002     2% on STKP
Z003     1% on STKP
Kindly help.
Thanks & Regards,

Hi,
Check the following things
1. Make sure manual entry is allowed for Delivery Costs Condition
2. Make sure PO is not yet processed or no subsequent documents exists for the PO so that you can manually edit the PO using ME22N.
Thanks & Regards,

Third Party Order Delivery Costs(COGS in Purchasing)

Hello MM/SD Gurus,
We have a Scenario where in its a 3rd Party Order direct shipment Process where the Shipping is done by a Logistics Vendor!
So->PR>PO>Inbound Del->GR->IR>Goods Issue-->Customer Invoice.
Now the Issue we have is Delivery Costs(Freight,Insurance,Duty etc) raised by Logistics vendor are taken as estimated costs during the PO creation with appropriate Condition Types but when at the end of the Month when Actual bill is sent the Prices are to be settled and paid back!!
2)Assuming vendor invoice of $100 and Freight invoice of $10. The accounting entries aare as follows:
Vendor 100-
GIT(Goods in Transit) 100
Fright Forwarder 10-
GIT 10
Since the Stock is Non Valuated here how can Account postings from PO/GR is shown for COGS in SAP.
Understood that COGS is hit when Goods Issue(GI) is done but our need is to account COGS in Purchasing.
Can anybody throw some idea of how to Capture the COGS in PO and post then individually with different G/L accts for Freight,Insurance etc.
Full points guaranteed heheheh! Pls help me with your expert suggestions.
Regards,
Hari'
Singapore

Hi Suraj,
Thankx for your reply and sorry for my delayed reply.
Well your answer is too immature for me to apply since I have already done all those and surpassed those things.
Well to make my question simple I need to account Delivery Costs(Freight,Insurance etc) during GR.Although I have setup all the COnd types in PO Pricing.Now I need to know since GR is Statistical and Goods are in Transit can I account the Delivery Costs into seperate G/L acounts??
It would be great if any of the Forum ppl have already setup capturing of the Delivery Costs in PURCHASING and accounting them into Sepate a/c's. I feel this is Common Scenario in most of the Mfg Org. So knowledge transfer is higly appreciated!!
Rgds,
Hari

"Reverse" planned delivery costs stated in PO

Hi,
In PO, we planned this delivery costs. During Post Goods Receipt, the amount of this delivery costs is debited into stock. So the accounting entries during PGR is Debit Stock, Credit GR/IR
But later, we discover that this is wrong- there will not be any logistic invoice for this and there will not be such costs. How can we reverse such an entry and close the outstanding PO due to this line? So I want to Credit Stock, Debit GR/IR. If there is no stock, it should be posted to Cost of Goods Sold.
Your help is much appreciated.
Thank you.

Hi,
Please check transaction-MR11 ,it will post the differences of GR/IR as per your requirement.
Thanks & regards,
Sandesh Sawant

Delivery Costs Entries(BEWTP = F/G/I/M) related to PO in EKBE

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for