Missing Routing List.....
Hi All,
Our material master is 40,000 and accordingly routing and BoM has been made.
Some of the routing and BoM are missing. Where should i get a list of missing routing as compare to material master or finish product.
Is there any report for missing routing for material ?
waiting reply.
Yusuf
Hi Yusuf,
SAP does not have any standard reports to suite your requirement. What i would suggest is to take couple of data extract from table to validate.
1. First dowload all materials which should have "BOM" and "Routing". This you can do by extracting "MARC" table data where field "BESKZ = 'E' or 'X' ".
2. Now you can extract the data from "MAST" for BOM and "MAPL" for Routing details.
Now do VLOOK up in excel to find the mismatch data.
This can also be done by a customised program, which i dont think it is required since it is going to be used only once.
Hope this helps...Reward your points if so,
Regards,
Prasobh
Similar Messages
-
Hi all
I seem to have run into bug CSCtq10477 and maybe CSCul71689 and CSCum85086, where calls can be received from an MGCP gateway, but fail outbound with Callmanager logs showing
03095771.002 |17:34:14.103 |AppInfo |RouteListCdrc::null0_CcSetupReq - Terminating a call after the RouteListCdrc cannot find any more device.
03095771.003 |17:34:14.103 |AppInfo |RouteListCdrc::terminateCall - No more Routes in RouteListName = RL_OUTBOUND. Rejecting the call
03095771.004 |17:34:14.103 |AppInfo |RouteListCdrc::terminateCall - Sending CcRejInd, with the cause code (41), to RouteListControl because all devices are busy/stopped.
03095771.005 |17:34:14.103 |AppInfo |GenAlarm: AlarmName = RouteListExhausted, subFac = CALLMANAGERKeyParam = , severity = 4, AlarmMsg = RouteListName : RL_OUTBOUND, Reason=41, RouteGroups(RG_OUTBOUND)
and a Route List exhausted alarm appearing in RTMT.
Resetting the MGCP gateway in Callmanager, bouncing the serial interface, E1 controller and No MGCP/MGCP has no impact. I could also see the circuit was not full.
We have got round this by removing the gateway from the Route Group and pointing the Route Patterns directly at the gateway and this works. I can see two of the bugs above are fixed in the latest 9.1.2SU3 code (9.1.2.13900-10), but I don't see CSCtq10477. This bug document shows some 9.1 code is OK, but not this one.
9.1(1.21020.1) - Not listed for download, is this an ES?
9.1(2.10000.11) - Not listed for download, is this an ES?
9.1(2.10000.28) - 9.1(2) - but not shown in the release notes for 9.1(2) either.
Does anyone know if the Release notes just missed this out, or does the bug document need the Fixed versions to be updated?
ThanksHi,
9.1(1.21020.1) is an ES.
9.1(2.10000.28) is the base version of 9.1(2) so this bug will be fixed in this version or any higher version of 9.1(2).
Upgrading to the latest ES or 9.1(1) or 9.1(2)SU3 would take care of this bug.
HTH
Manish -
Hello everbody,
I have a route list which points to 3 route groups. Here's the order:
First one is a PRI in Boston (Primary), second is a T1 in Boston and the tired one is a PRI in New York. As Configured; when first PRI is not available the T1 has to kick in and when none of the links in Boston are available the PRI in New York has to take the charge. The links are working individually but when I unplug the PRI in Boston, we cannot make any calls. It looks like the switch over is not configured properly. Is there any configuration that I am missing? Where else de I need to look and configure in order to assure the failover?
Thanks,
BTAlso, one thing I noticed in the router config, you have dial-peer 101 pots configured, putting mcgpapp on the the PRI - the interop guide says you should not do this:
Restrictions for MGCP PRI Backhaul and T1 CAS Support
?Voice interfaces on the NM-HDA and the AIM-VOICE-30 are not supported.
?Integrated access, in which the channels on a T1 or E1 interface are divided between a group used for voice and another group used for WAN access, is not supported when voice is controlled by Cisco Unified CallManager through MGCP.
?T1 and E1 protocols, such as QSIG, E1 R2, T1 FGD, and PRI NFAS, are not supported with MGCP only with H.323.
?E1 CAS is not supported.
?Do not add the application mgcpapp command to dial peers that support PRI backhaul.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6441/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a0080541bf5.html
That used to be generated when you downloaded the config from CM, and then it went away, and I know we put it back in a few places, but now they specify that you should not. I wonder if you removed that and did a ccm config check reset on the router to redownload config if it would behave better - that is, if you determine that it is really not unregistering.
Mary Beth -
i got problem when trying to call my iphone 4 using facetime with my Macbook Pro 13',it did ringing,but my iphone 4 did not receive that call as if nothing happen.But,when the call ended,that call appeared in the missed call list.fyi both are connected to internet.Help!! thank you in advance
i got problem when trying to call my iphone 4 using facetime with my Macbook Pro 13',it did ringing,but my iphone 4 did not receive that call as if nothing happen.But,when the call ended,that call appeared in the missed call list.fyi both are connected to internet.Help!! thank you in advance
-
Missing Parts List While creating Prd. Order
Hi Friends,
My client is creating production Orders Manually thru CO01and While Creating & Saving The Production Order System Is Not Supporting In Giving Missing Parts list In spite Of Deficit of Un Restricted stock inStorage Location For BOM components used in that Order.
To my surprise when the defisit is for all the BOM components only one component is showing as missing part in missing parts list.
But While confirming the order The system is showing missing parts for all the components which are defisit for order confirmation.
I Tried To Get This From the Following Method
Checked For Define checking control In OPJK.
Selected plant, Order type & selected the business function 1 for create or 2 for release. And Maintained These Settings
a) Removed tick mark in No Availability check.
b) Type of component check Given as - ATP check.
c) Material release - 1. User decides on release if parts are missing.
d) PP Checking rule (Which Is same As with plant parameter OPPQ)
e) In Define scope of check (OPJJ) made a tick mark in check w/o RLT.
Then Assigned the availability checking group at Mrp View of Header material.
In spite Of All These Settings Still At The Time Of Order Release/Save A Warning Massage Or A Informative Massage Is Not Appearing
*Please Suggestu2026u2026u2026u2026*
hariHi,
Please check same checking rule use in Material master and with order type and plant?
Check the cheking group in material master MRP3 view for all material.
Go to Transection OPJJ - Maintain scope of check,
Select your Checking rule which you have assing to your order type and tick INLCUDE RESERVATION.
(1). CO24- Missing Parts Information System
Under this transaction you choose Selection from Reservations and then select Plant & Material then you can get Missing Parts List for your respective material without production / planned order also.
(2). COOIS : Production Order Information System
Under this transaction you need to Select in List option as Components and then go on Selection Tab.
For collective availability check use
COHV - Excute the roport w ith collective avaliabilty check.
COMAC.
Hope this help.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar -
Does the route list gets reset when adding route pattern in version 9 of CUCM?
Hi All,
I created a new route pattern in call manager version 9 and then associated it to an existing route list. But when I was trying to save the route pattern. I was prompted with the message saying " Any updates to this Route Pattern automatically resets the associated gateway or Route List"
I was not able to see this message on CUCM version 8.6 however on CUCM version 9 it is there.
Does that mean that the route list/gateway will be reset and the existing calls will be dropped?
Or is it a bug?
A response will be greatly appreciated.
ThanksHi Farhad,
It does pop up when we modify the Route Pattern in CUCM 8.6 too.
If you asociate the GW/Trunk directly to Route Pattern, yes, it will reset them and calls will be interrupted. To avoid that, we need to associate the Route List to Route Patterns.
//Suresh
Please rate all the useful posts. -
Missing Part list for Plant to Plant Purchase order
Hi,
I need the following requirement in CO24,
In CO24 its shows the missing parts for Sales order, similarly we want the missing parts list for Plant to Plant Purchase order in the same report. Also the report,
1.It should not consider the Planned order for a sales order.
2.It should not consider the planned order which can be convert into purchase requisition.
3.The procurement type should be "E" or "X".
Kindly guide me is there any standard layout changes in available or any development we have to do.
Thanks
Muthamil Murugan.GHi Purushothaman,
If you have the following settings in OPJK:
Plant XXXX
Order Type XXXX
Availability Check 2
[X]Status Check
[X]Check material availability when saving order (may not need)
Checking Rule PP PP checking rule
Component Check Type ATP check
Release material 2 Release permitted despite missing parts
Then in COHV you try to mass release the order with the following parameter:
List: Order Header
Selection: Your selection criteria
Mass processing:
Function: Release
Max. No.of Processes 99
Save Log: Always
Release control order: Collective Order Release
Then after the order is released, you can find the missing part list of that order in CO03 menu path:
Goto->Missing Parts->Missing parts list
Hope it helps.
Regards,
Rachel -
Is RTMT can monitor when the first Route Group of a Route List is not used ?
Hi everyone,
I want to find how monitor this event in RTMT without success. I hope someone will have an idea to suggest !
My problem :
I have one Route List (RL_Remote) wich is used to route calls between two sites. This Route List has two Route Group :
- the first is a SIP trunk connected to my remote site (RG_SIP)
- the second is a local route group wich used PSTN (RG_PSTN) [BACKUP]
Is it possible that RTMT sends me an alarm when calls are routing via RL_Remote but are not using RG_SIP ?
In fact, I want to receive an alarm as soon as the Backup Route Group (RG_PSTN in my example) is used.
Thanks for your help !
Have a nice day,
Franck-EmanuelMore or less correct yes:
Core Issue
This issue can occur if an available route is not found in the indicated route list.
If the call fails on the current gateway, Cisco CallManager attempts to extend the call to the next route in the route list. This occurs until it reaches the last route. If the call cannot be completed with the last gateway, the Route List Exhausted event is logged.
These are possible reasons for a failure on the current gateway:
Unallocated number, such as a non-existing destination
Busy user
Out of bandwidth
Gateway fails to respond to the call setup request
The user receives alerts similar to this in the Real-Time Monitoring Tool (RTMT):
Most Recent Alert Raised: At 09:19:27 on 12/21/2005 on cluster CALLMANAGER1-Cluster. Number of RouteListExhausted events exceed 0 within 60 minutes.
There are at least five RouteListExhausted events (up to 30) received during the monitoring interval from 09:07:27, 12/21/2005 to 10:07:27, 12/21/2005.
https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-29032 -
CCM 4.1 route list issue
We are trying to transfer a calls to an after-hours call center. Unfortunately we are getting a fast busy when we attempt to forward. When I run 'debug isdn q931' I can see the reason we are getting a fast busy is the number prefix is incorrect. It's trying to forward the number with our 7 digit prefix in front of the calling number. So our 7 digit prefix is 989-2525 and the calling party for example is 909-656-2222, so when it trys to forward the call it shows the calling party as '98925259096562222' which is why we get a fast buy. The 7 digit prefix 989-2525 is defined in the Route List Configuration, which has to be set otherwise I'm unable to call inbound. What's adding the prefix? Sometimes I'll see the calling party as '98925259892525' and the call does go through.
Heya Carlo!
When you say check if they are the same configured, you are referring to them both having the same selected partitions? I'm able to call the call center from my phone with the correct calling party number.
I'm using a translation pattern where I have a CTI port configured in the Called Party Transform Mask. Under Called Party Transformations I have:
Discard Digits: NONE
Called Party Transform Mask: 2600 <---- this is the CTI port I have configured
Prefix Digits (Outgoing Calls): BLANK
Calling Party Transformation settings are blank.
As for the Route Pattern, I have one configured using the route pattern* 9.1909[2-9]XXXXXX where the discard digits is set for PreDot. I'm actually thinking the issue with discarding digits incorrectly is in the route pattern, still reading up on that part now. What do you think with this info provided? -
T1/E1 redundancy in Route List
Hi All:
Can some one please help me to resolve the issue?
I have 2 route groups in a route list for a Dial pattern, but for testing purpose when I shut down one controller , it DOES NOT go automatically to 2nd route group.
RL_Toronto
--à RG-Tor ----T1 with 24 channel in NM-HDV
à RG-Ottawa -----T1 with 24 channel in NM-HDV
9.[2-9]XXXXXX -- RL_Toronto
I tested each route group individually, it is working perfectly, however when I give it as redundant and shut down one of the controller ( eg: When RG_Tor –T1 down, it should go to RG_Ottawa T1) but it is not taking the redundant T1 for backup.
Any suggestion would be much appreciatedWell, are these gateways MGCP or H.323? Sounds like they may be H.323. If
so, you have some options. There is a Call Manager service parameter you
could look into: "Stop Routing on User Busy" and "Stop routing on
unallocated number". They are set to true by default, you can set them to
false and force the CUCM to hunt through the route list.
You could also opt to leverage the following gateway configuration instead
of modifying the service parameters. I prefer the gateway config myself:
no dial-peer outbound status-check pots
HTH.
Regards,
Bill
Please remember to rate helpful posts. -
Calling Party Number empty when the call gets to Route List
Caller id is not showing up on 911 calls. Using Dialed Number Analyser I can see the calling Party Number fine through the route pattern. Then in the Route List it comes up empty. Nothing in the config of the Route List is restricting or manipulating the calling number. Use calling party's external phone number mask is set to on. We are using Standard Local Route Groups.
Thanks in advance for your help.Do you see the caller ID on the GW in debugs?
What type of circuit is used for this call? If PRI can you provide "debug isdn q931"?
Chris -
Hi Team,
We are facing issue for availability check. During creation of Production order, the missing part list is not complete and it should show componenet A in the Missing part list. Below is the details:
Production Order quantity: 100 kg
Componenet A required quantity: 100 kg
MMBE Unrestricted qty: 1000 kg
MMBE Reserved Quantity: 2000 kg
So as per above figures component A should come as missing part during availability check. But it is not coming as missing part. Please check and give your inputs.Hello
The results of availability check should NEVER be compared with MMBE. As already mentioned, transaction CO09 is more appropriate.
Also, this issue has been already discussed on hundreds of threads in the past. See some examples below:
Problem with missing parts list during production order creation
issue in committing material for production order
Material Availibility check in Production orders
availability check
order is not released
As it is stated on the The SCN Rules of Engagement you should do some research before opening a thread. Therefore, please use the search tool or even google to search for similar problems before opening a thread.
BR
Caetano -
In purchasing reports window for the open items list reports from the dropdown menu if you the select the "missing items " you get a report for the items which are in negative stock values.What does field consignment mean in this report?
Regards
LouisHi Buddy,
In the Open Items List (Reports -> Sales and Purchasing -> Open items
List),items appear in 'Missing Items List' when the 'Available' stock is
negative. The available stock is displayed in the Item Master Data ->
Stock tab.
When the 'Available' figure (Inventory - Item Master Data - Stock Tab)
falls below zero the item is visible in the missing items.
The consignment field is visible in the Item Master Data - Stock tab.
If it is not visible go to Tools - Form Settings and select the
'Visible' check box for the field.) If this field has a value then it
will be visible when the item appears in the Open Items List.
The figure which appears in the 'Consignment' column is a calculation
field, based on the sum of all open deliveries(where the delivery
increases the negative 'Available' stock)/Released Production orders -
open returns.
Hope the above information can be useful for you.
Best Regards,
Tim -
Missing Items list returns wrong results
Hi All,
Have an issue whereby items are included on the missing items list report which show no consignment value and a positive available value...
I.e. Item A is showing on the list with:
In stock 30
Committed 1
Available 29
Anyone ever come across this?
Many Thanks,
MattHi Guys,
I think the issue is more to do with the fact that the report is picking the items up even though it has a positive value in the available field, the consignment field seems to be correct.
This is happening for a lot of items, even for items where there is no data in either the consignment or available fields.
The version is 8.8 PL14.
Thanks,
Matt -
Scope of Check Variation in Missing Part list Production Order
Hi,
I have a problem that While creation or conversion from planned order to production order if i get missing part list i found that Scope of check is as Z6 and ZP (Checking rule).But when when i Release the same production order also am getting missing part list here when i check scope of check as Z6 and PP(Checking rule).
Why this difference is coming,can any body tell the possible causes.
Cheers,
Kumar.S>
KUMAR.S. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a problem that While creation or conversion from planned order to production order if i get missing part list i found that Scope of check is as Z6 and ZP (Checking rule).But when when i Release the same production order also am getting missing part list here when i check scope of check as Z6 and PP(Checking rule).
>
> Why this difference is coming,can any body tell the possible causes.
>
> Cheers,
> Kumar.S
Kumar,
Its simple for creation and release of Production order different checking rule is used(This must be intentional). You check this in OPJK transaction, check for your order type / Plant combination for Business function 1(Create) the checking rule assigned would be ZP, whereas for the same order type / Plant combination for Business function 2(Release) the checking rule would be PP.
If you want the same, you can change it here. But I assume there must have been a purpose for this custom checking rule creation. You can find the scope of check difference between these 2 combinations in transaction OPJJ.
Regards,
Prasobh
Maybe you are looking for
-
My i pod touch was stolen about a week ago. Ive been looking for ways to find it and its been pretty hopless. I have owned 7 i pods in the last 5 years and they have all been stolen, I guess you could say im pretty unresponsiblle but I prefer to ca
-
Network Positioning of a Windows Server 2012 R2 Direct Access & VPN Server
Reposted moved from Windows Server Forums- Security Hi I'm in the process of creating a new active directory forest with a single domain using AD.Contoso.com to use the Microsoft example. The reason I have decided on AD.XXXXXXXXX.com is to get way fr
-
How to specify which cert to use for software virt server?
Is there a way to specify which certificate to use for each software virtual server? So, for example a user hitting https://somewhere.com would get the certificate for somewhere.com while the virtual server https://somewhereelse.com would use the cer
-
GR value is less than PO value
Hi, PO has been created for 150000 l qty and gross price is 31.81. GR made for 21202 qty amount is 671034 but manual calculation it is 674435. 3000 rs price difference is their. How find find the difference
-
IPad mini Safari Browser hijacked - any ideas to defend against intrusion?
My safari session was hijacked as in I was no longer in control of where the browser was going and typing. Almost like a remote control app. When I proceeded to iPad settings the hacker attempted to stop me from shutting down JavaScript, block cooki