Multiple account assihnment in sigle line item

hi all,
please let me know the proceedure how to activate the multiple account assginment for sigleline item.-account assignment cat: K
i tried with OME9(MAINTAIN ACCOUNT ASSIGNEMNET CATEGORY)
ID: AcctAssgt - status to 2, but the thing is when i do the PO, GR-non valuation tick becomes active. even though i de-activated GR-NON valuation indicator in the same screen.
the error message is 06 438
Valuated GR not allowed in case of multiple account assignment.

There are two preconditions that must be fulfilled -
1) Go to transaction OME9 and flag on the 'IR changeability' indicator of the account assignment category 'K' (since this is for services).
2) When maintaining your PO, make sure that the GR-non-valuated indicator is flagged.
When GR is posted, no accounting document will be generated. This accounting document will be created during IR posting where A/P can manually modify the accounting data as their wish.
In fact, it is possible to maintain multiple account assignment for each and every PO line item by selecting the 'Multiple Account Assignment' button in the 'Account Assignment' View of the Item Detail of PO. However, for such multiple account assignment selection, no accounting document will be generated upon GR maintenance. This can only be done during IR via LIV process.
From the accounting point of view, for one particular single line item, it is possible to split into different cost centers or internal orders. For instance, I have ordered 10 pcs of bearings of which 4 will be charged to Cost Center A and the remaining 6 pcs will be posted to cost center B. However, it is of SAP standard feature that once using the multiple-account assignment, no accounting document will be generated after GR posting. They will only be posted when IR is maintained.
Thanks

Similar Messages

Service PO - Multiple account assignments for service line items

Hi All,
I'm trying to create a service purchase order using BAPI 'BAPI_PO_CREATE1'.
But i need to create service line items with multiple account assignments say
For line item 10 -
1)Service line 1 -Cost center 'XYZ'.
2)Service line 2 -Cost center 'ABC'.
In POACCOUNT there is no option to specify the service line item .
Moreover in POSERVICES also there is no option to mention costcenter.
How can i create the same...
Thanks in advance
Regards
Prasanthi

Dear Prithviraj,
CAPEX (Category 'A'), can it apply to OPEX/Blanket and Sm. Proj?
I know create multiple account assigment under ME51N/ME52N.
Any solution by using FM (BAPI_REQUISITION_CREATE and BAPI_REQUISITION_CHANGE)?
thanks
Regards,
Weng

GR can not printed for PO-Multiple account assignment on single line item ,

Hi!
I made a pr with single line item with 3 account assignment on percentage basis.I created a PO against .GR non valuated was automatically ticked so no account assignment was created at the time of GR posting.
Can I make a valuted GR against PO line item with multiple account assignment.
I faced another problem .I displayed the GR and after ticking out put check box in the general data page of the GR doc. the output is being saved but the update is terminated immediately.and no output page is generated in this item level.This output problem is not there at the time of single account assignment at PO line item.
Can you please let me have the solution ?
Thank snd regards,
Suranjana

> I made a pr with single line item with 3 account assignment on percentage basis.I created a PO against .GR non valuated was automatically ticked so no account assignment was created at the time of GR posting.
When you are having the multiple account assignment, then the system will force you to have GR-non valuated indicator being flagged which results in the fact there is not any FI document at GR posting stage and this is the standard feature of SAP.
> Can I make a valuted GR against PO line item with multiple account assignment.
No, not at all. The disability of GR indicator can be set in OME9 with account assignment category
> I faced another problem .I displayed the GR and after ticking out put check box in the general data page of the GR doc. the output is being saved but the update is terminated immediately.and no output page is generated in this item level.This output problem is not there at the time of single account assignment at PO line item.
In fact, it is possible to maintain multiple account assignment for each and every PO line item by selecting the 'Multiple Account Assignment' button in the 'Account Assignment' View of the Item Detail of PO. However, for such multiple account assignment selection, no accounting document will be generated upon GR maintenance. This can only be done during IR via LIV process.

XML shows multiple po distributions account for each po line item

Hi, We have custome RDF created for Purchase Order Detail Report. Per the PO summary report, PO nubmer 30367 has two lines and each on has single distributions. Each line has different distributions. Line 1distribution account: 01.000.105.65020.00000.00 and Line 2 distribution account: 01.000.000.15020.00000.00. However when I run the XML for PO summary report, each line items contains the two account distributions. How do you make it sho it only show the account distribution pertain to the each line?
**Please see xml below.**
- <LIST_G_COMPANY>
- <G_COMPANY>
<C_COMPANY>CTI US Ledger</C_COMPANY>
<C_ORGANIZATION_ID>83</C_ORGANIZATION_ID>
<GL_CURRENCY>USD</GL_CURRENCY>
<STRUCTURE_ACC>101</STRUCTURE_ACC>
<STRUCTURE_CAT>101</STRUCTURE_CAT>
<C_YES>Yes</C_YES>
<C_NO>No</C_NO>
<C_CATEGORY_SET_ID>1</C_CATEGORY_SET_ID>
<BUSINESS_GROUP_ID>0</BUSINESS_GROUP_ID>
- <LIST_G_HEADERS>
- <G_HEADERS>
<POH_REMARKS />
<CREATION_DATE>01-SEP-10</CREATION_DATE>
<STATUS>Approved</STATUS>
<REV>0</REV>
<PRINTED_DATE />
<TYPE>Standard Purchase Order</TYPE>
<BUYER>BUNTING, DOUGLAS</BUYER>
<C_CURRENCY>USD</C_CURRENCY>
<VENDOR>Softchoice Corporation</VENDOR>
<ACCEPTANCE_DATE />
<ON_HOLD />
<VENDOR_SITE>SOFTCHOICE - PO</VENDOR_SITE>
<ACCEPTANCE_REQUIRED>No</ACCEPTANCE_REQUIRED>
<C_AMOUNT_AGR>2500</C_AMOUNT_AGR>
<PO_HEADER_ID1>2790</PO_HEADER_ID1>
<REVISED_DATE />
<PO_NUMBER>30367</PO_NUMBER>
<C_FND_PRECISION>2</C_FND_PRECISION>
- <LIST_G_BREAK_LINES>
- <G_BREAK_LINES>
<LINE>1</LINE>
<LINE_TYPE>GOODS</LINE_TYPE>
<REV1 />
<ITEM_DESCRIPTION>Test</ITEM_DESCRIPTION>
<UNIT>EACH</UNIT>
<PO_HEADER_ID>2790</PO_HEADER_ID>
<UNIT_PRICE>500</UNIT_PRICE>
- <LIST_G_SHIPMENTS>
- <G_SHIPMENTS>
<CLOSED_CODE />
<LINE_CLOSED>N</LINE_CLOSED>
<LINE_CANCEL>N</LINE_CANCEL>
<NOTE_TO_VENDOR />
<NEED_BY_DATE />
<PROMISED_DATE />
<SHIP_TO_LOCATION>CELL THERAPEUTICS INC</SHIP_TO_LOCATION>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_ORDERED>1</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_ORDERED>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_RECEIVED>0</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_RECEIVED>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_CANCELLED>0</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_CANCELLED>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_DUE>1</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_DUE>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_BILLED>0</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_BILLED>
<C_FLEX_CAT>COMPUTER SUPPLIES</C_FLEX_CAT>
<C_FLEX_ITEM />
</G_SHIPMENTS>
</LIST_G_SHIPMENTS>
- <LIST_G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
- <G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<DELIVER_TO_PERSON_NAME>DOUGLAS BUNTING</DELIVER_TO_PERSON_NAME>
<PO_HEADER_ID2>2790</PO_HEADER_ID2>
<CONCAT_SEGMENTS>01.000.000.15020.00000.00</CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<PLL_LOCATION_ID>3053</PLL_LOCATION_ID>
</G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
- <G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<DELIVER_TO_PERSON_NAME>DOUGLAS BUNTING</DELIVER_TO_PERSON_NAME>
<PO_HEADER_ID2>2790</PO_HEADER_ID2>
<CONCAT_SEGMENTS>01.000.105.65020.00000.00</CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<PLL_LOCATION_ID>3052</PLL_LOCATION_ID>
</G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
</LIST_G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<C_FLEX_CAT_DISP>COMPUTER.SUPPLIES.</C_FLEX_CAT_DISP>
<C_FLEX_ITEM_DISP />
</G_BREAK_LINES>
- <G_BREAK_LINES>
<LINE>2</LINE>
<LINE_TYPE>GOODS</LINE_TYPE>
<REV1 />
<ITEM_DESCRIPTION>test</ITEM_DESCRIPTION>
<UNIT>EACH</UNIT>
<PO_HEADER_ID>2790</PO_HEADER_ID>
<UNIT_PRICE>1000</UNIT_PRICE>
- <LIST_G_SHIPMENTS>
- <G_SHIPMENTS>
<CLOSED_CODE />
<LINE_CLOSED>N</LINE_CLOSED>
<LINE_CANCEL>N</LINE_CANCEL>
<NOTE_TO_VENDOR />
<NEED_BY_DATE />
<PROMISED_DATE />
<SHIP_TO_LOCATION>CELL THERAPEUTICS INC</SHIP_TO_LOCATION>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_ORDERED>2</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_ORDERED>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_RECEIVED>0</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_RECEIVED>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_CANCELLED>0</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_CANCELLED>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_DUE>2</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_DUE>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_BILLED>0</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_BILLED>
<C_FLEX_CAT>COMPUTER SUPPLIES</C_FLEX_CAT>
<C_FLEX_ITEM />
</G_SHIPMENTS>
</LIST_G_SHIPMENTS>
- <LIST_G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
- <G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<DELIVER_TO_PERSON_NAME>DOUGLAS BUNTING</DELIVER_TO_PERSON_NAME>
<PO_HEADER_ID2>2790</PO_HEADER_ID2>
<CONCAT_SEGMENTS>01.000.000.15020.00000.00</CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<PLL_LOCATION_ID>3053</PLL_LOCATION_ID>
</G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
- <G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<DELIVER_TO_PERSON_NAME>DOUGLAS BUNTING</DELIVER_TO_PERSON_NAME>
<PO_HEADER_ID2>2790</PO_HEADER_ID2>
<CONCAT_SEGMENTS>01.000.105.65020.00000.00</CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<PLL_LOCATION_ID>3052</PLL_LOCATION_ID>
</G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
</LIST_G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<C_FLEX_CAT_DISP>COMPUTER.SUPPLIES.</C_FLEX_CAT_DISP>
<C_FLEX_ITEM_DISP />
</G_BREAK_LINES>
</LIST_G_BREAK_LINES>
<C_AMOUNT_AGR_ROUND>2500</C_AMOUNT_AGR_ROUND>
<C_AMOUNT_AGR_DISP>2,500.00</C_AMOUNT_AGR_DISP>
</G_HEADERS>
</LIST_G_HEADERS>
</G_COMPANY>
</LIST_G_COMPANY>
<XCOMPANY_NAME>CTI US Ledger</XCOMPANY_NAME>
<YES>Yes</YES>
<NO>No</NO>
<ORG_ID>83</ORG_ID>
<CAT_ID>1</CAT_ID>
<COUNT_RECORDS>1</COUNT_RECORDS>
</XXCTI_POXPOSTD_1>
**Here is the Query for the RDF file...**
SELECT pol.line_num Line
, pol.closed_flag Line_Closed
, pol.cancel_flag Line_Cancel
, pol.closed_code
, plt.line_type Line_Type
, &P_FLEX_CAT C_FLEX_CAT
, &P_FLEX_ITEM C_FLEX_ITEM
, pol.item_revision Rev
, pol.item_description Item_Description
, pol.unit_meas_lookup_code Unit
, pol.note_to_vendor Note_to_Vendor
/* Bug: 141118 Take unit price from PO_LINES if there is no shipment */
, to_number(decode(plt.order_type_lookup_code,
'AMOUNT',null,
nvl(pll.price_override,pol.unit_price))) Unit_Price
, hrl.location_code Ship_To_Location
, pll.promised_date Promised_Date
, pll.need_by_date Need_By_Date
, ROUND (DECODE (PLT.order_type_lookup_code, /* <SERVICES FPJ> */
'RATE', NVL(PLL.amount, POL.amount),
'FIXED PRICE', NVL(PLL.amount, POL.amount),
NVL(PLL.quantity, POL.quantity)), :p_qty_precision) Quantity_Amount_Ordered
, ROUND (DECODE (PLT.order_type_lookup_code, /* <SERVICES FPJ> */
'RATE', NVL(PLL.amount_received, 0),
'FIXED PRICE', NVL(PLL.amount_received, 0),
NVL(PLL.quantity_received, 0)), :p_qty_precision) Quantity_Amount_Received
, ROUND (DECODE (PLT.order_type_lookup_code, /* <SERVICES FPJ> */
'RATE', NVL(PLL.amount_cancelled, 0),
'FIXED PRICE', NVL(PLL.amount_cancelled, 0),
NVL(PLL.quantity_cancelled, 0)), :p_qty_precision) Quantity_Amount_Cancelled
, ROUND (DECODE (PLT.order_type_lookup_code, /* <SERVICES FPJ> */
'RATE', NVL(PLL.amount, POL.amount) - NVL(PLL.amount_cancelled, 0)
- NVL(PLL.amount_received, 0),
'FIXED PRICE', NVL(PLL.amount, POL.amount) - NVL(PLL.amount_cancelled, 0)
- NVL(PLL.amount_received, 0),
NVL (PLL.quantity, POL.quantity) - NVL(PLL.quantity_cancelled, 0) - NVL(PLL.quantity_received, 0)),
:p_qty_precision) Quantity_Amount_Due
, ROUND (DECODE (PLT.order_type_lookup_code, /* <SERVICES FPJ> */
'RATE', NVL(PLL.amount_billed, 0),
'FIXED PRICE', NVL(PLL.amount_billed, 0),
NVL(PLL.quantity_billed, 0)), :p_qty_precision) Quantity_Amount_Billed
, pol.po_header_id
FROM po_line_locations pll
, mtl_system_items msi
, mtl_categories mca
, po_lines pol
, po_line_types plt
, hr_locations hrl
WHERE
ROUND (DECODE (PLT.order_type_lookup_code,'RATE', NVL(PLL.amount, POL.amount) - NVL(PLL.amount_cancelled, 0) - NVL(PLL.amount_received, 0),'FIXED PRICE', NVL(PLL.amount, POL.amount) - NVL(PLL.amount_cancelled, 0) - NVL(PLL.amount_received, 0),NVL (PLL.quantity, POL.quantity) - NVL(PLL.quantity_cancelled, 0) - NVL(PLL.quantity_received, 0)), :p_qty_precision) > 0
AND (ROUND (DECODE (PLT.order_type_lookup_code,'RATE', NVL(PLL.amount, POL.amount),'FIXED PRICE', NVL(PLL.amount, POL.amount), NVL(PLL.quantity, POL.quantity)),:p_qty_precision)) > (ROUND (DECODE (PLT.order_type_lookup_code,'RATE', NVL(PLL.amount_billed, 0),'FIXED PRICE', NVL(PLL.amount_billed, 0),NVL(PLL.quantity_billed, 0)), :p_qty_precision))
AND pol.item_id = msi.inventory_item_id(+)
AND nvl(msi.organization_id,:c_organization_id) = :c_organization_id
AND pol.line_type_id = plt.line_type_id
AND pol.category_id = mca.category_id
/* Bug No 141118
Added the outer join on po_line_id ,hrl.location_id and nvl on the shipment_type
Also added nvl on quantity and price so as to select quantity and price if the PO
has no shipments */
AND pol.po_line_id = pll.po_line_id(+)
AND pll.ship_to_location_id = hrl.location_id(+)
AND pll.shipment_type in ('STANDARD', 'PLANNED')
AND &P_WHERE_CAT
AND &P_WHERE_ITEM
ORDER BY pol.line_num

> I made a pr with single line item with 3 account assignment on percentage basis.I created a PO against .GR non valuated was automatically ticked so no account assignment was created at the time of GR posting.
When you are having the multiple account assignment, then the system will force you to have GR-non valuated indicator being flagged which results in the fact there is not any FI document at GR posting stage and this is the standard feature of SAP.
> Can I make a valuted GR against PO line item with multiple account assignment.
No, not at all. The disability of GR indicator can be set in OME9 with account assignment category
> I faced another problem .I displayed the GR and after ticking out put check box in the general data page of the GR doc. the output is being saved but the update is terminated immediately.and no output page is generated in this item level.This output problem is not there at the time of single account assignment at PO line item.
In fact, it is possible to maintain multiple account assignment for each and every PO line item by selecting the 'Multiple Account Assignment' button in the 'Account Assignment' View of the Item Detail of PO. However, for such multiple account assignment selection, no accounting document will be generated upon GR maintenance. This can only be done during IR via LIV process.

One inspection lot for multiple materials of purchase order line items

Hi All,
My client requirement is one inspection lot for multiple materials of purchase order line items.
Please share your thoughts.
Thanks in advance for early reply.
Regards,
Jishu

I totally agree with Amol.
I don't think I would touch that development nor would I ever tell a client it could reliably be done through development.
Knowing what I know about the table structures, I don't think you could create any development for this that could use a significant amount of the existing tables and functionality. I think you'd have to create all your own Z tables and basically rebuild the functionality. Tying it back in with SAP data will be difficult.
You're even looking at all custom screens for your results recording and UD as well. And if you have follow-on functions like batch classification requirements, batch determination, COA publication, results copy functions, use of DMR and sampling procedures, physical samples, quality notifications, etc. etc.. you could be looking a whole lot of development.
Craig

Sales order no and line item no in account assignment tab of line item no.

Hi All,
When we display a sales order and go to line item --> Account assignment tab --> we can see sales order no and line item no in that screen. We want to know from where this existing no. in that field is populating from.
We want to know this as we want to check feasibility of changing sales order and item no to maintenance contract no and line item no. ( Maintenance contract we have to pick from notification)
If anybody has any idea about this do let me know as this is urgent requirment.
Effort will be rewarded.
Thanks in advance.
Edited by: Satish Bharambe on Jul 4, 2008 10:38 AM

Hi Satish,
You mean Accounting assignment tab-->In Settlement rule details
If yes the order number which is coming in that field Sales order and for which sale order you are looking that details both are the same numbers(i.e Nothing but sales order number).
When you create sales order system will give number of the sales order the number will come in this place.
I hope it will help you,
Regards,
Murali.

Wip gl account amount and fbl3n line item gl account not matched

hi sap gurus
Cound any solve this error
i got one error at the time of wip calculation i.e., during settlement of order, the wip gl account amount and the FI line item gl account amount i.e., in fbl3n line item the wip gl account shows the differnt amount.
now my question is why system shows like that Plz any one tell me the solution.

SAP Note says 968812
There are various reasons for verified differences:
1. You made direct FI postings to material balance sheet accounts.
2. In MM account determination, balance sheet accounts are used for operations other than 'BSX'.
3. Material documents exist that have no FI follow-on document, even though they should.
4. There are FI documents or other accounting documents but the source document in materials management is missing.
Solution
(Point 1)
The amounts from these postings do not have any equivalent in the material valuation and therefore cause the MM/FI differences. You must cancel the corresponding postings in FI. You must then set the 'Post automatically only' indicator (XINTB) in the account master record (fs00).
(Point 2)
In MM account determination, material stock accounts can only be assigned during operation 'BSX' because only these postings update the material valuation. Postings from other operations, such as price difference (PRD) or revaluations (UMB), lead to MM/FI differences. The balances resulting from this must be transferred to other accounts in FI.
(Point 3)
Your system contains active customer enhancements (user exits, customer exits, BAdIs) that cause an additional 'COMMIT WORK' statement to be processed. This is not allowed and results in inconsistencies. The incorrect documents can be corrected by SAP Remote Consulting (SAP employees should refer to internal Note 941721).
(Point 4)
This case is identical with case 3. However, usually it is not a 'COMMIT WORK' statement that is responsible but a 'ROLLBACK WORK' statement in the customer source code. In particular, method MB_DOCUMENT_BEFORE_UPDATE in BAdI MB_DOCUMENT_BADI creates a ROLLBACK without program termination and an incomplete document because the documents in accounting are created after the BADI. Therefore, a ROLLBACK must always be accompanied by a program termination.
The MM document cannot be regenerated. The accounting documents must be deleted. This can be initiated by a message (which may be subject to charges) on component FO-GL-GL-X. See also Note 636442.
(General)
If the cause of the problem is unclear, SAP support can run an analysis. In this case, first implement the additional reports from Note 32236 in your production system.

Substitution rule for gl account text field in line item.

Hi
We have intercompany postings made for a no.range of GL accounts ex: 1000-1999.When ever this accounts are getting posted ,i.e the accounting doc,need to make substitution such that what ever the description is given in the offsetting entry(ex: vendor 10000 - Material vendor ) for this GL in the accounting doc should come in the text field .
I want the description of the vendor account to be inb the text field in the line item of the gl account.Is it possible thru substitution.If so how.
Please advise.

Thanks for all your replies.
I Want the field BSEG- KOBEZ i.e description field in the accounting doc of the offsetting entry to be replaced in the GL account text field.
Ex :
PK    Account        Description                  Amount           Text
31    100000         Furniture Vendor             50             Sales
40    1999             Inter Compy                     50             Furniture Vendor
I want the description of offsetting entry vendor description i.e Furniture vendor (field BSEG-KOBEZ) to be replaced in GL line item text BSEG-SGTXT.
I cant find the field BSEG- KOBEZ while i search in the substituion to replace in Text field.
How do i write in substitution to say that the offsetting entry description should be in text field of GL account.

Need to clarify why some clearing accounting documents without no line item

Hi All,
there are few clearing accounting documents created. In that for very few documents are generated without line item.
could you anyone tell me what might me the reason?
waiting for your reply,
Regards

Hi Chintan,
Thanks for your reply. there are some other clearing documents where i can execute it through FB03. but there are only 3 documents which are not appering in fb03. it says list contains no data. can you please tel me what might me the reason.
Regards

Multiple Payors for One Order Line item. Is it possible?

Hello SD Gurus
I am trying to see if SAP allows inputting multiple payors for each sales order line item? We have a requirements, where the net value at the line item level will be split up in 1 to 4 payors and then we need to generate the invoices seperately for each of the payors based upon the dollar amount allocated.
If you have come across such scenario please let me know to accomodate such requirements.
Thanks much
Jai

Hi Aj
Thanks for your quick response. I was think on the same lines and you have confirmed that we will have to split the line into several lines on sales order.
I am trying to do that now in our ECC box i.e item 10 with payer 1 and item 2 with payer 2. But as soon as I try to change the payer on item 2, i get the following error message which relates to credit management being active.
I am assuming once we decativate CM, we should be good to go. PLease confirm. Also once its time for billing, will SAP automatically split the billing into different invoices per sales order line item based upon number of payers on the line items?
PLease confirm your thoughts.
Regards
Jai

Unable to post the accounting doc for Zero line item billing doc

I have an issue that customer has incidently created the cross company repl delivery with zero line batch qty along with some xx qty batch. PGI and billing also done. But because of zero qty unable to create accounting document. Asked customer to do the invoice cancel and do reversal of PGI and delete the zero line item in delivery. But customer has problem in doing of PGI reversal and asked us without doing of PGI reversal process the zero qty billing to be posted to accounting. Customer has reversed the billing doc and created again for XX qty batch and releasd for accounting. But the zero batch line item is pending in billing due list and unable to release for accounting .
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
R.Sridhar

Hi
Try to do the summarization of FI document, so, this item will be merged with others. See SAP Note 36353 - AC interface: Summarizing FI document for further details.
Regards
Eduardo
Edited by: E_Hinojosa on Jul 12, 2011 5:36 PM

Account assignment template (FB60) Line item Value date

Hi Gurus,
I have an issue regarding the value date on line item level on Account assignment template on FB60. When user activates an Account Assignment template, on each line item system populates the value date equal to the date of the template creation date and not the current date. I created the template with several GL accounts and before saving it I deleted the value date from the line items. Now I want to reuse the same template after a week, it shows the correct GL accounts but with the value date equl to the template creation date (last week date). Any suggestion please, how can I fix this.
Regards,
Ahmad

In the IMG "Enter Global parameters" for your Company code change the status of the switch "Define Default value date" and then test.
Thanks
Ron

Posted Accounting documents not showing line items

Hi!
I facing a problem that has been created during the posting of accounting documents.
The Problem:
A Number of accounting documents were posted but there are no entries for them in BSIS, where as the header exists in BKPF and the detail exists in BSEG. So although it is showing the document as posted. It is not reporting it against the relevant G/L Account. Since cheques have already been issued against these documents, we are trying to avoid a reversal of these documents.
Our Analysis of the problem
We think that the problem has arose due to an error in the master data of G/L Account.
Some new G/L Accounts were created and the person creating it forgot to check the 'Line Item Display' Check in fs00->Control Data Tab.
New Documents were meanwhile created with line items using these G/L Accounts and were then posted.
When the mistake was realized the 'Line item Display' was checked for these Accounts. This however occured after the documents were posted.

Ashan,
1) entries come only in BSIS/BSAS when Field "Indicator: Open Item Management" = X (SKB1-XOPVW)
2) For line item display, the system stores an entry per line item in an index table which contains the link between line item and account.
-> I think you've to run a "correction-program" but
plz only in agreement with SAP (OSS)
Andreas

How to assign values from multiple output(cursor) to fields(line item-one below other) in forms??

Hi all,
I have a Form which has text_field columns as below , created from table RECEIVED_FORM_15G. This table is blank.
1)     CUST_CODE with 1 line item. (Number of Items displayed=1)
2)     ACCT_FD_NO with 10 line items. (Number of Items displayed=10)
There are more than 1 ACCT_FD_NO for 1 CUST_CODE.
When i enter the CUST_CODE and press tab, all the values of ACCT_FD_NO must get displayed. I am taking ACCT_FD_NO values from another table called KEC_FDACCT_MSTR
and want to display ACCT_FD_NO, one below other (line item). So i put in the following code:
BEGIN
       FIRST_RECORD;
       FOR CUR_R IN (SELECT ACCT_FD_NO FROM KEC_FDACCT_MSTR WHERE   STAUS='E' AND ACCT_CUST_CODE=:CUST_CODE)
       LOOP
           NEXT_RECORD;
          :ACCT_FD_NO :=CUR_R.ACCT_FD_NO;
       END LOOP;
    END;
But the problem is i'm not able to display the captured value in next consecutive line items.
It is getting displayed in first & second line item only.
The first value gets displayed in first line item, then the cursor moves from first line item to second line item,
the second value gets displayed in the second line item, (this is because of NEXT_RECORD in my code)
later all the values are getting displayed in the second line item only. (I checked it using message call.)
I want it to display one below the other.
The problem is the cursor is not moving to third line item after the second line item.
So the remaining values gets displayed in the second line item only.
So what is wrong in my code??
Where should i place the next_record to make the cursor move from one line item to next line item i.e from second line item to third line item
& third line item to fourth line item & so on.... Please let me know.
Thank You.
Oracle Forms Builder 6i
Oracle 9i.

The above code is right..
The only mistake was In the property palette of CUST_CODE, "required" was not set to "Yes" .
So after setting required to 'YES' , it worked perfectly fine.

Multiple sales deal for a line item in the order

Hi,
We are planning to use sales deals but i'm wondering as the sales deal is entered at condition record level, If i have one line item on an order and that this line item will have several sales deal eligibible (several condition records with different sales deal) What sales deal number will be saved on the VBAP table and VBRP table (sales and billing document). The sales deal is not saved at condition level (KONV) ?
Does anyone know that ?
Thanks
Myriam.

Hi, Gurus,
Any answer to that question, please ?
Thanks.
Myriam.

Multiple account assihnment in sigle line item

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for