Pp-actual costing/valuation varient

Hi all,
A-----Finished product mfgd & sold from plant X
B-----SemiFinished product mfgd from plant Y & procured to plant X, for the mfg of product A.
BOM of A contains B.
B is maintained in both the plants X & Y, with the sp proc key 40 in plant X with issuing plant as Y.
During order/preliminary costing, I want that the component A & B both should be valuated based on the mvg avg price maintaied in the material master.
The valuation varient is having the required settings as---- moving average price for the required order type.
But the same is not working. The order costing is taking only the standard price.
Can anybody help me on this??
Regards,
Manish

Hi
Please maintained the strategy valuation price according to price control in material master in valuation variant
also check the Define goods received valuation for order delivery
Thanks
Ansuman

Similar Messages

Actual Cost when using Valuated Stock

Hi All,
I am using valuated stock in my project. The process would be,
Reservation -> MRP Run -> PR -> PO -> GR -> GI.
In this scenerio,I am expecting the actual cost, when I do the goods issue. However, the actual cost comes to project when I do the Goods Receipt (GR).
Where the setting is missing?
Regards
Prabu K

Prabu Kaliappan wrote:
> However, the actual cost comes to project when I do the Goods Receipt (GR).
>
> Where the setting is missing?
Actual Cost you are seeing while doing GR is only a statistical postings, because you have maintained statistical cost element for the inventory GL.
The real actual cost will hit project only after GI.

Actual Cost in Valuated Stock

Dear PS experts,
     I am facing an issue in case of actual costs in 'valuated project stock' scenario.
      The scenario is as following:
   1. A material(assembly) is attached to network having planned costs as 100 Euros.
   2. The planned costs for project is also now 100 Euros.
   3. This material is assembly made from using 2 materials.
   4. The assembly is made by subcontractor.
   5. The breakup of the costs is 80 euro for 2 material components and 20 euro as subcontracting charges.
   6. When I run MRP and covert a req. to PO, the commitment is 20 euro for subcontracting order and 80 euro for material components PO.
7. After I receive the 2 material components in stock, the actual cost(statistical cost element is hit) for project becomes 80 euro.
8. When I send these components to the supplier and he converts it into assembly material, at GR the entries are like this:
          a. Commitment is reduced of 20 euro, actual cost is incurred for 20 euro for subcontracting charges.
          b. The consumption is booked for 2 components(movement type 543), actual cost incurred is 80 euro.
             So total actual costs at this stage is 100 euros.
9. Now the assembled material is issued against network activity ( movement type 281 Q), this again updates the the consumption at project with value 100 euro.
   In this way, I am seeing the actual cost at project is 200 euro. I think it is not correct, does anybody have any opinion on this. I am not able to understand if it is related to valuation categories.
If you are having any clue about it, please let me know. Thanks in advance !
Regards,
Mahendra Dighe

Hi,
I hope this scenario clarifies your problem.
assly- X- 100
material A- 40
Material B-40
Sub contracting charges20
MAterail A & B came to stock (project stock) so inventroy 80 INR(statistical)
now subcontracting PO for 20 INR
you can not issue project stock to subcontractor so you have to transfer A & B to plant stock. then do 541 for subcontracting
now in project you are having actual -0 and commitment 20
when you confirm subcontract PO then material X with 100rs will come to the stock. this will reflect as 100 INR in project as an inventory. just check cost element report.
when you issue it to network then inventory become zero and actual consumption shows you 100 INR again check yourcost element report.
i think this is how subcontracting works... lets wait for other experts comment.
I dont understand why you are doing 543 movement ( goods isue for sale order)?
venkatesh
Edited by: venkatesh kulkarni on Dec 3, 2009 8:38 AM

Actual Costing: Alternative valuation : "Relevant for Costing" indicator

Hi:
We are using alternative valuation in our Actual Costing
We would like to know the use of the "Relevant for Costing" indicator. (XPCP field).
Documentation said: "If you set this indicator, the results of the alternative valuation run can be used in the standard cost estimate for the material." But there is not a clear explanation in the online doc or other info sites.
How does it works? What is the exact meaning of "can be used in Standard cost estimate"?
How can we get these values from Product Cost planning?
Best Regards:
Manuel

Manuel,
If that Field is checked, it should update the Planned Price in the Costing 2 Tab of the Material Master Record. I did not try this though.
regds

Valuated WIP at Target Cost or Actual Cost

Hi,
In a production order, how do we valuate it at target cost or actual cost?
Thanks,
Teo

Hello Sir ,
As per sap wip is valued at actual cost only.
Thanks & Regards
A.V.J .Krishna Reddy

Actual cost of production order in inventory valuation

Hi,
Kindly tell me in our client requirement to "capture actual cost of drum manufactured. This cost will go to finished mixer. So actual goods receipt of drum should be with actual production order cost . Also actual mixer cost should be taken from actual production order cost. How to map this s cenarionin in SAP" ?
Best Regards,
Anindita

Hi Shyam,
In SAP product costing we use generally standard cost estimation. Raw material ara taken as moving averagae price as v and finished products are taken as standard price i.e, S. Before cost estimation we update plan price in material master costing view 2 for accurate cost estimation. In case of standard cost estimation price variance is occured which is post to separate gl account. Our client wants actual cost rather than standard cost. Without implementing material ledger is it possible to do actual costing in SAP. Please let me know the process of actual costing...
Regards,
Anindita

Report painter/writer for actual cost component split

Hello Gurus,
Any of you guys ever explored possibility of creating a report using report painter or writer that can give both Standard and Actual cost component splits in one report? Is it even possible without custom ABAP involvement?
Thanks
RG

Hi Raghu,
After your reply, I am getting a doubt..
Have you Activated Material Ledger? When you say Actual Cost Component Split, are you talking about it what you get in Actual Costing/Material Ledger?
If yes, then you can map your cost compnents for Actual Costing in the path SPROControllingProfitability AnalysisMaster Data Valuation--Setup Valuation using Material Cost Estimate -- Define Access to Actual Costing / Material Ledger
Further, there are no standard reports available in COPA. Try to build a report comprising two columns, 1st column with the value fields which are mapped for Standard Cost Components and 2nd column with the Value Fields which you have assined for Actual Costing under the above path.
You will be able to get the comparison...
Pls don't hesitate to call me for further assistance....
Srikanth Munnaluri

Price differenc value in Actual cost of Production

Hi,
We are creating a production order for Billets that is our Semifinished goods. The material master is maintained at Std price.
Lets say that Std prce of the Billet is 100.
Lets say that after the production order is completed , the actual cost of Billet is comes out to be 125.
Now this billet is used for the production of the finished goods Wires. For the production order of wires, the price of the billet is taken as 100.
In this way the actual cost of the Wire will not come.
May be this is the standrad process. Let me know in any way can we use price difference of 125-100= 25 in the production cost of wires so that I can get the actual cost of the wire.
We are not using Material Ledger.
Any suggestion
regards

Thanks Ajay,
Even using ML we cannot get the actual price before the end of the period. And at the month end only we can valuate the inventory withe actual cost. I hope I am right till now.
Pl correct if I am wrong.
But in this case some wires rods are already out from the inventory for the sale that was valuated with the Std Price of the Billet.
Hence these invenories will not be available at the month end for the revaluation.
Pl. correct If my thought is OK.
ML can only be used where ther is lots of Raw Matl price variation..Hence I think I should go with the std price valuation itself.
regards
Kamlesh

Actual cost of FG batch

Hi all GURU's,
I had posted this thread earlier also but i had not got any reply on this. Hence I had closed that thread & now posting my query with this thread.
Please if anybody can throw some light on this..........
My BOM structure is as follows. The BOM is the multilevel BOM as shown below.
FG-----SFG 1 + RM 1 + RM 2
SFG 1----SFG 2 + RM 3 + RM 4
SFG 2-----SFG 3 + RM 5 + RM 6
SFG 3-----RM 7 + RM 8
All the FG, SFG & RM'S are the batch managed. All the fg & sfg's are maintained at the standard price in the material master.
Now assume that SFG1, SFG2, SFG3, batches are manufactured at the cost which deviate too far form the material master. This may be because excess/lower raw material cosumption & wide variation in the actual activity.
Now I want to know the cost of FG based on the actual costs of SFG & RM"S batches used. How can I do this in SAP.
Reagards,
MHP

Hi Rajesh,
I have tested what you had suggested in this thread,
Following are the findings
1) All the batches of the SFG & FG are valuated at mvg. avg. price. mentioned in the material master even if i am issuing double than planned material as well as double the actvity.
2) Since the batch of SFG is not valuated at the actual cost, the actual cost is not passed to the higher level.
One thing I can share with you is the warning messge which i am getting while making GR for the order by mb 31 which is as follows---
Material COLL FG plant XYZ1 valuated with valuation type instead of TEST2000
Message no. CK840
Diagnosis
Material COLL FG in plant PT01 cannot be valuated with valuation type TEST2000 because no split valuation is ever possible for that material in this plant.
System Response
The material is valuated with valuation type .
But in OMWC setting, Valuation Cat.-X Automat.(Batch) is active for the plant & material is assigned to the same Valuation Cat.-X in the material master. Since val cat is X there is no question of valuation type. As well as in OMWO split mtl val is active.
PLease suggest what can be wrong ???
Regards,
MHP

Sales order costing - tracking of actual costs at sales order item level

Hi
We are going with sales order costing for services
Service material is non-valuated hence the scenario is non-valuated sales order stock
PP module is not implemented.
I am having following questions
1. How to track the actual costs at sales order item level? Is Internal order/CO production order is required to be created for the same?
2. Can I do activity confirmations directly from cost center to sales order item.
3. Can Raw material is issued directly against sales order item.
4. Is Sales order is a real or statistical account assignment object?

dear friend,
please look here:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/EN/42/d7248ab27111d19e9a080009b0db33/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/EN/90/ba6cfb446711d189420000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
reagrds,

Actual cost at the time of Goods Receipt

Hi All,
When I create Goods Receipt, I am getting actual cost in WBS Element. As per customer request, When I do the Goods Issue then only actual cost has to come to WBS Element.
1. Is it due to statistical cost element cretaed for inventory account (BalanceSheet account)?
2. If statistical cost element not cretaed, will commitment raise?
(Or) Am I missing any configuration settings?
Regards
Suresh

Sureshkumarsap wrote:
> 1. Is it due to statistical cost element cretaed for inventory account (BalanceSheet account)?
Yes, if you are using valuated Project Stock.

Actual cost component values

Hi
We are facing an issue that actual cost component values in our system are not calculating correctly. We consider that there might be difference in our understanding regarding the calculation of actual cost component values.
Therefore I want to understand that how actual cost component values are calculated in SAP Material Ledger. I will appreciate if anyone can elaborate this with example and formula, used for calculation.
Regards

Hi Saad,
Please find below about the actual cost calculation in ML.
In ML single -level and multi-level material settlements are available. Multilevel price determination calculates the periodic unit price for a material. The standard price, the single-level differences cumulated in the period, the differences between planned and actual prices, as well as input material differences (multilevel differences) are all taken into account.
The material price calculated in multilevel price determination can be used for inventory valuation.
The actual price for each material can be updated to the material master for the closed period.
-During price determination, the system carries out the following calculation:
=>Daily Transaction
1) Purchasing XYZ Qty 20 Std : 10, Actual : 11
   Dr) Stock XYZ 200                   CR) GRIR 220
Purchase price differ XYZ 20
2) Purchasing ZYX Qty 20 Std : 20, Actual : 22
   DR) Stock ZYX 400                   CR) GRIR 440
Purchase price differ ZYX 40
3) Good issue XYZ Qty 15 Std : 10
   DR) Material cost XYZ 150               CR) Stock XYZ 150
4) Good issue ZYX Qty 15 Std : 20
   DR) Material cost ZYX 300               CR) Stock ZYX 300
5) Good receipt 234 Qty 15 Std : 40
DR) Stock 234 600                    CR) Clearing 600
6) Good delivery 234 Qty 10 Std : 40
   DR) Material cost 234 400         CR) Stock 234 400
7) Good receipt 123 Qty 10 Std : 50
    DR) Stock123 500                    CR) Clearing 500
8) Good issue 123 Qty 5 Std : 50
   DR) Material cost 123 250         CR) Stock 123 250
9) Good receipt ABC Qty 10 Std : 60
    DR) StockABC 600                    CR) Clearing 600
10) Sold ABC Qty 5 Std 60
    DR) COGS 300                          CR) Stock ABC 300
=> Monthly Material Ledger Closing
1) Single-level price determination
   DR) Stock XYZ 5 ( Current Stock 5 / Total Purchase Qty 20 * price difference 20)
   CR) Purchase price differ XYZ 20
*Transfer price difference to 234 15 ( Good issue qty 15 / Total Purchase Qty 20 * price difference 20)
    DR) Stock ZYX 10 ( Current Stock 5 / Total Purchase Qty 20 * price difference 40)
    CR) Purchase price differ ZYX 40
*Transfer price difference to 234 30 ( Good issue qty 15 / Total Purchase Qty 20 * price difference 40)
2) Multi-level price determination
    DR) Stock234 5 ( Current Stock 5 / Total Good receipt 15 * price difference 15)
    CR) Transfer price difference to 234 from XYZ 15
*Transfer price difference to 123 from 234 10 ( Good issue qty 10 / Total Good receipt 15
       * price difference 15)
    DR) Stock 234 10 ( Current Stock 5 / Total Good receipt 15 * price difference 30)
    CR) Transfer price difference to 234 from ZYX 30
*Transfer price difference to 123 from 234 20
        ( Good issue qty 10 / Total Good receipt 15 * price difference 30)
    DR) Stock 123 15 ( Current Stock 5 / Total Good receipt 10 * price difference 30)
    CR) Transfer price difference to 123 from 234 30
* Transfer price difference to ABC from 123 15
            ( Good issue qty 5 / Total Good receipt 10 * price difference 30)
    DR) Stock ABC 7.5 ( Current Stock 5 / Total Good receipt 10 * price difference 15)
    CR) Transfer price difference to ABC from 123 15
*Not allocated price difference 7.5
            ( Sold qty 5 / Total Good receipt 10 * price difference 15)
3) consumption revaluation
         DR) COGS ABC 7.5
         CR) Not allocated price difference 7.5
=> Current Actual Stock Amount
   1) XYZ Qty : 5 Actual Amount : 55 (actual price : 11)
   2) ZYX Qty : 5 Actual Amount : 110 (actual price : 22)
   3) 234 Qty : 5 Actual Amount : 215 (actual price : 43)
   4) 123 Qty : 5 Actual Amount : 265 (actual price : 53)
   5) ABC Qty : 5 Actual Amount : 307.5 (actual price : 61.5)
I hope you understand the process of actual cost cal in ML.
Regards,
chandu.

How to analyse actual cost for each operation in Process/Production Order?

Hi all,
IN SAP, I know that we can analyze plan cost for Operation in Process Order/ Production Order.
However, I can not analyze Actual cost for Operation .
I know the object when I good issue material is ORDER, not OPERATION.
But, as requirement of users, they want to analyze actual cost for each Operation.
CAn SAP do this analyze?
If Yes, What should I do in SAP to have this reports?
THanks in advance,
Emily Nguyen

Hi Emily,
as I see from one other message that you're using material ledger. Then your expectation is apparently to also see the actual costs of materials in your production order by operation.
This is not supported. Actual material costs are handed up in material ledger multi-level settlement from one material to the next, bypassing the production orders.
That means the production order will always contain the material costs valuated at plan price, not at actual price.
For activity prices that might be better, when you revalue the orders at actual activity prices with CON2. But even there I am not sure that it will always be assigned correctly to the operations.
There is currently an enhancement in development, the operation level costing. But that will affect more the planned cost side not the actuals. Might be interesting to learn more about your requirements and the use case behind.
best regards,
Udo

Plan cost & Actual cost in KKBC_ORD for CO Prdn Order

Dear Experts,
We are not able to findout the why difference is appearing during T code KKBC_ORD order analyse for Raw materials, please suggest wht may be the wrong thing in the order?
Before this i would like to brief you on the process.
Raw matls are created with "V" as price control. & Finished Goods as "S" control.& we create one BOM. Say example
My finished Goods will be 500555 code & Raw matl code will say 1001010 & 1002020.
My BOM will contain these raw matls with qty of 1kg each.
FG code 500555 of 2kg Bag
Items are 1001010 & 1002020 of 1kg each.
Here my mvng price are 2 & 4Rs for raw mtls 1001010 & 1002020 respectively.
In Material master we define overhead key as 10% to a Finished goods (500555) in Costing view.
1) Now i create a Base planning object T code KKE1 & I update the 10% as overhead cost & raw matls qtys as per BOM.At the end you can see the overall manufacture cost of the FGs in this case you will get for
FG 500555 about 6.6Rs. then save it.here it is done for 1bag only.
2) Create a CO PRDOUCTION ORDER T code KKF1 system will generate one number & save it. Now go to KKF4 add the base planning object name & enter the required qty say 10 bags...
You can see the COGM will now 66Rs for 10 bags as per the planning.
3)Goods issued to Order 261 with refc to BOM & Order number entred qty as 10. Sytem will calculates the qtys of raw mtals based on 10bags & save it.
4)Goods receipt done against CO PRDOUCTION ORDER (Finished goods 500555).
*5)KKBC_ORD i hav updated the CO PRDOUCTION ORDER & choosen cost trend. Here i am seeing a diffc in actual cost column & variance of 26%.but how it is possible*
Regards
TG

I can think of a couple of areas where there may be differences.
First, your CO order is probably not getting any overhead costs. Your base planning object had 10% overhead built into it, but that is only for developing the preliminary cost estimate for the order. The allocation of actual overhead must occur through some other method (i.e. overhead costing sheet, activity allocation, or template allocation).
Second, the actual material costs assigned to the order will be based on the material's inventory valuation at the time they are issued to the order. Since you said the materials are valuated at weighted average cost, it is possible that their inventory valuation changed between the time the base planning object was created and the time they were issued to the order.
thanks,

Actual costs posted to work order without maintaining costing variant

hi,
i havent maintained costing variant for work order(maintenance order) type i used to create the work order. so when i posted goods issue, how does the actual costs get posted with out maintaining the costing variant for work order type. what is the role of costing variant configuration in work order type settings.
thanks,
monica

Hi monica,
Costing variant forms the link between the application and Customizing, since all cost estimates are carried out and saved with reference to a costing variant. The costing variant contains all the control parameters for costing.
The configuration parameters are maintained for costing type, valuation variants, date control, and quantity structure control.In costing type we specify which field in the material master must the price be updated,
In valuation variant we specify in what order the system should go about accessing prices for the material master planned price, standard price, moving average price etc. Further which is the price which should be considered for activity price. How the system should select BOM and routing.
assign points if useful
Regards
Genie

Pp-actual costing/valuation varient

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for