SUBSEQUENT DEBIT IN MIRO

Dear All ,
kindly help me out in this issue as i have done the I,V for a P.O but IV is still tobe done for freight as Rs2000/- is to be paid through MIRO, But in invoice The actual freight is Rs 4000/- Kindly guide me that how i can pay the rest 2000/-as subsequent debit i have never done this before pl help me out , i " be very thankfull to all .
point will be awarded immed.
thanks in adv
sap11

Hi
To post a subsequent debit/credit, proceed as follows:
1.Fill out the initial screen. In the section Select, specify the purchase order to which the subsequent debit/credit refers. Enter the indicator for the type of subsequent debit/credit in question in the Subsequent debit/credit field. To proceed to the vendor screen, press ENTER.
2.Fill out the vendor screen. Press ENTER to display the selection screen. The order items are listed. The Quantity column contains the previously invoiced quantity; the Value column is empty.. All the items are selected.
3.For those items to which the subsequent debit/credit applies, enter the amount and, if necessary, correct the quantity. Select the items that are affected by the subsequent debit/credit.
4.After you have chosen Goto ® Document overview, the system checks whether price variances are caused by the subsequent debit/credit. If this is the case, you automatically proceed to each individual item screen where there is a price variance. By pressing ENTER, you proceed from one item screen to the next and from the last screen to the document overview.
5.Choose Document ® Post to post the document, provided the balance equals zero.

Similar Messages

Subsequent debit in miro - Number of items in document is too large

Dear Experts
When i am doing subsequent debit in miro I am getting the eror "Number of items in document is too large" I have alreday posted invoice now i am doing subsequent debit .
Please do the need full
Regards
San

Hi,
check this blog:
( Restriction of Maximum 999 FI Document Items During MM transactions )
Restriction of Maximum 999 FI Document Items During MM transactions
Best regards.

Revaluation run (MRNB) v/s Subsequent Debit / Credit (MIRO)

Hello Experts
We are working on ECC 6.0.
I'am aware how to use MRNB & posting subsequent debit / credit note through MIRO.
I want to know when to use MRNB in comparison to Subsequent Debit / Credit?
Suppose vendor has suppiled certain goods at Rs 100 per unit. Invoice have already been posted against the GRs. Now the vendor asks for additional Rs. 2 per unit.
In such a scenario should MRNB or Subsequent credit is to be posted?
I've noticed that when MRNB is used material MAP remains unaffected unlike posting a Subsequent Credit / Debit. Why it remains unaffected during MRNB run? If the material price is changed then its impact should also come on inventory which doesnt happen in MRNB.
For both the cases is excise claiming to be adjusted through J1IH manually ?
Regards
Kapil

Hello,
Subsequent Debit and Credits
After an Invoice is successfully posted and the transaction is completed, Vendor approaches with additional amount invoice or correction in Invoice.You would like to post this additional invoice with reference to the original PO and item. Subsequent Debit / Credit functionality allows you to capture this difference without canceling original invoice.
Please check this link
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/a8/b99890452b11d189430000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
Regards,
Shailesh

Import PO subsequent Debit: Taxes not calculated as per tax Code in MIRO

Dear All,
I am facing the problem while taking Subsequent debit (MIRO) of Import PO. I am using service Tax code 10.30 % .
When I entered the amount 4000 INR. It calculated the taxes 348.18 which is not correct.
I also check condition in FV13 its properly maintained.
Thanks in Advance
Regards
Pawan Sarda

Hello
Thanks for ur Reply.
MIRO -- Subsequent Debit -
>Tax code - S3 ( 10.30 % Services Tax) -
>PO NO. -
> change Vendor ( Import Vendor to Domestic Vendor) -
> Amount 4000 INR -
> also change Tax Code of Line Item   -
>Simulate
Vendor A\c -
>   4,348.18 INR Cr
Stock A\c -
> 4,000.00 INR Dr
Service Tax -
>     338.04 INR Dr
ECS             -
>         6.76 INR Dr
HECS          -
>       3.38 INR Dr
Above process I m doing against Import PO but I m not identify why its calculated Wrong Service Tax or calculating on which base amount ?
Actual Entry
Vendor A\c -
> 4,412.00 INR Cr
Stock A\c -
> 4,000.00 INR Dr
Service Tax -
>    400.00 INR Dr
ECS             -
>        8.00 INR Dr
HECS          -
>      4.00 INR Dr
Edited by: pawansarda on Jan 21, 2012 11:41 AM

MIRO/ Subsequent Debit problem

I have the following scenario.
A purchase is made for a material for which the taxes include Excise Duties , VAT/CST. Now when we return this item physically , we reverse all taxes , n this is done via sales.
But when we make a subsequent credit , that is debit to vendor , due to quality reasons ( not involving any physical returns) , we reverse the VAT/CST , but NOT Excise.
In MIRO, when i make a subsequent debit to ve ndor ,how can i make a provision such that only VAT?CST is reversed n not Excise ?
Thanks in advance ,
Regards
Anis

Pls extend Help

Posting Subsequent Debit via EDI(MIRO)

Hello All,
Any idea how to post the subsequent debit or credit via EDI using transaction code MIRO. We were able to post invoice/credit memo through EDI but not subsequent debit/credit.
Advance thanks for the reply.
Thanks
MP

Hi
Posting of subsequent debit and subsequent credit is not possible using EDI for invoice verification.
When you transmit invoice information via EDI, you
Cannot create subsequent debits
Cannot settle planned delivery costs
Cannot post with varying purchase order units of measure
Cannot post invoices for blocked purchase order items
Please check the link
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60/helpdata/en/44/f50abcea3b11d194dc0000e83dd751/frameset.htm
Thanks & Regards
Kishore

MIRO Subsequent Debit

HI,
Below is the situation of what happened
1) Limit PO created for 1000 GBP
2) GR Posted for 600 GBP
3) Invoice posted for 600 GBP
4) Subsequent credit posted for 200 GBP
again..one more
5) Subsequent credit posted for 200 GBP
Now I am trying to post
6) Subsequent Debit for 200 GBP and system is not allowing to post
Getting below error
Tolerance limit of only 25 GBP will be allowed
7) If i am going to post Subsequent debit for 400 GBP there is no error
Wanted know Concept behind this
Thx,
jai

Resolved the issue, Thanks..
Subsequent debit posted for full 400 GBP due to tolerance limit
Then after Subsequent Credit posted for the 200 GBP
Regards,
Jairaj

Miro debit/credit note and subsequent debit/credit

Dear all,
May I know under what circumstances we use debit/credit note and
under what circumstances we use subsequent debit/credit
Need advice.
Thanks

Hi,
A subsequent debit/credit arises if a transaction has already been settled, and a further invoice or credit memo is received afterwards.
A subsequent debit/credit changes the total invoice value of a purchase order item; the total invoice quantity remains unchanged. Therefore, only a value-based update of the purchasing transaction takes place. There is no quantity-based
update.
1. Subsequent Debit :-You must enter an invoice as a subsequent debit if a purchase order item has already been invoiced and further costs are now incurred. (Example: A vendor has inadvertently invoiced you at too low a price and then sends a
second invoice for the difference.)
2. Subsequent Credit :- You must enter a credit memo as a subsequent credit if a purchase order item was invoiced at too high a price and you have now received a credit memo. (Example: A vendor has inadvertently invoiced you at too high a price and then sends a credit memo for the difference.)
If you enter a subsequent debit/credit, the system suggests the entire invoiced quantity, but no value. The maximum quantity that you can subsequently debit or credit is the quantity that has already been invoiced. You can only enter a subsequent debit/credit for a purchase order item if an invoice has already been posted for this item.
A subsequent debit/credit cannot refer to a particular invoice.
Subsequent debits and credits are listed separately in the PO history.
3. Credit Memo :- You usually receive a credit memo from a vendor if you were overcharged. As is the case for invoices, credit memos refer to purchase orders or goods receipts.
You post a credit memo if too large an amount has been invoiced. When you post the credit memo, the total invoiced quantity in the PO history is reduced by the credit memo quantity. The maximum quantity you can make a credit for is the quantity that has already been invoiced.
In the same way as the corresponding goods receipt is expected or posted for the invoice, in the case of a credit memo, the system assumes that the credit memo belongs to a return delivery or reversal of the goods receipt. This means that the credit memo is settled using the GR/IR clearing account.
Regards,
Pardeep Malik

Subsequent delivery and subsequent debit

Dear All,
material type: NLAG
account assignemnt (PO): cost center, non valuated GR
Scenario:
1. GR (MIGO) - material_document1, qty 100
2. IR (MIRO) - invoice1 for material_document1, qty 100
> vendor makes correction because qty is more or less than the original
3. GR (MIGO) - material document2 - qty 20 (sum qty for PO item is 120)
4. IR (MIRO) - subsequent_debit1 for 20 pcs
These connections / links should exist:
Material_document1 - invoice1
Material_docuemt2 - subsequent_debit1
My question
How can I solve this? Is it posible to book the subsequent debit with reference to material_docuement2?
If I create the subsequent invoice it is valid only for material_document1 EVEN IF I do material_document2 as SUBSEQUENT DELIVERY in MIGO (in this case the two material documents are connected). SAP expects an additional invoice for material_document2 (but it is linked to material_docuement1!).
In my opinion it cannot be solved since the debit/credit memo refers to the "original" material document (1) and invoice (1).
Thanks,
Csaba
My question was a little bit incoherent...
I wanted SAP to suggest the to-be-credited qty&value automatically in case of returns to vendor - but it's not possible in standard system as per my best knowledge .
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Mar 4, 2009 9:18 PM
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Mar 4, 2009 9:22 PM

Hi Bala krishnan,
when there is a price difference this entry would takes place. while reversing the same should be reversed, in your case the system is posting to another account.
please check the account key against the wrong line item ( this you can see with the help of changing layout), then goto OBYC and check the gl accounts assigned against that. To check either it is right or wrong compare with the standard/default company codes settings i.e 0001 co.cd.
Thanks & Regards,
Shashi Kanth.

Subsequent debit for a vendor before invoice??? (URGENT!!!!!)

hi all,
i want to post subsequent debit for a vendor before invoice. but the system is giving a message "The quantity to be debited/credited cannot be any greater than the quantity invoiced so far."
can anybody tell me how to post subsequent debit before posting the invoice (i haven't got the vendor invoice yet but i must pay the freight cost).

Hi,
Subsequent debit : Rarely, you receive from your vendors invoices or credit memos that refer to transactions that have already been invoiced. Your company wants to use subsequent debits/credits to process these documents. A subsequent debit/credit changes the total invoice value only of a purchase order item but the total invoice quantity remains unchanged.
The processes are:
1) Subsequent credit or even subsequent debit is done when total VALUE" of invoice is changed.
2) Total invoice Quantity is remained same.
3) Only value based transaction takes place & not quantity base.
4) If credit memo is received from memo then subsequent credit is done in MIRO.
For example vendor has submitted invoice of 100 Qty for Rs 1000 & we have posted the invoice & subsequently he realized that he has invoice for higher price i.e. it should have been actually 900 Rs as against Rs 1000 .In this case he will send a credit memo of Rs 100 for which we will be doing subsequent credit.
5) This is done for PO items if an invoice is already posted
6) cannot refer to particular invoice
7) Listed separately in PO history
8) In PO total values is updated but not Quantity.
For ur case you can pay to Vendor(freight cost ) by selecting Planned Delivery Cost instead of Goods/Services items in MIRO T.Code
Regards,
Biju K

Subsequent debit tax calculating wrong

dear guru
while doing subsequent debit for the vendor the Excise duty is calculating wrong
my issue is like this
i have purchase 100 quty with value 10/kg total amount is 1000 for that
ED is calculated 140
Ecess calculated 3
S&H calculated 1
i have done goods receipt and posted invoice also
now i that part of the quantit i have returne
lets 50 kg i have retune for that MIRO,MIGO,JIS,J1iV i have done
next vendor will send the suplimentry invocie because the rate is increase for that 50 quantiy, for that i will do J1IH for the additional excise and i will do MIRO subsequent debit for the rate increse in miro the tax amount is calculating wrong, ie
lets for 50 quantity total amoun increased 100
ed should calculate 14 but it is calculating 28
for that i have to apply any note
pl tell me urgent
thanks
regards
jrp

My understanding about the Input Tax and Output Tax was wrong. In the issue reported
Input Tax Calculation should be:
Vendor A/C.............. Cr 30000-
Expense A/C............ Dr 29100
Input Tax A/C............ Dr 900 (@3% on 30000)---my understanding was wrong.
Input Tax 3% should be charged on Expense amount, in this case Rs 30000. But because in the editing option calculate tax on net amount option was not selected, hence SAP was giving the below entry, which is correct as well.
Vendor A/C.............. Cr 30000-
Expense A/C............ Dr 29126.21
Input Tax A/C............ Dr 873.79 (@3% on 29126.21) which is correct.
Hence, the Vendor amount should be Expense + Input Tax= 30000 * 3%=900 + 30000 (expense) = 30900.
Correct Entry should be:
Vendor A/C...............Cr 30900
Expense A/C............Dr 30000
Input Tax A/C............Dr 900
Resolved. Pankaj has given the correct answer.

Blanket PO - Subsequent debit

Hi,
    I see a scenario where a blanket purchase order is created , but without the item category 'B'. The value is limited by the quantity entered in the PO and by releasing it. The invoices are posted against the PO, with the amounts in the invoices from the vendor. And Goods Receipt also posted for that amount.
Once a subsequent debit is posted for the credit note received. Is there a necessity to post a GR in this case(possible with a negative value?). And if so, what could be the movement type.
Thanks
Aparna

Hello
Thanks for ur Reply.
MIRO -- Subsequent Debit -
>Tax code - S3 ( 10.30 % Services Tax) -
>PO NO. -
> change Vendor ( Import Vendor to Domestic Vendor) -
> Amount 4000 INR -
> also change Tax Code of Line Item   -
>Simulate
Vendor A\c -
>   4,348.18 INR Cr
Stock A\c -
> 4,000.00 INR Dr
Service Tax -
>     338.04 INR Dr
ECS             -
>         6.76 INR Dr
HECS          -
>       3.38 INR Dr
Above process I m doing against Import PO but I m not identify why its calculated Wrong Service Tax or calculating on which base amount ?
Actual Entry
Vendor A\c -
> 4,412.00 INR Cr
Stock A\c -
> 4,000.00 INR Dr
Service Tax -
>    400.00 INR Dr
ECS             -
>        8.00 INR Dr
HECS          -
>      4.00 INR Dr
Edited by: pawansarda on Jan 21, 2012 11:41 AM

Subsequent debit, credit and credit memo

Hi,
what is the difference between subsequent debit, credit and credit memo in MIRO transaction.
In case of vendor had given us credit note with relevant to particular for which we had already completed the invoice verification and payment also paid.
in this case what document should i use i.e crdit memo, subsequent credit memo or subsequent debit memo??
plz suggest

Hi
You need to use a credit memo.
Subsequent debit is used if you have already invoiced
You have already received an invoice from your vendor for all the goods received. Subsequently, freight costs are to be taken into account, however, the invoice quantity remains the same.
Subsequent credit is used if you already have done a credit memo on the PO
You have already received a credit memo from your vendor for all the goods received. Subsequently, freight costs are to be credited to your company, however, the credit memo quantity remains the same.
Thanks & Regards
Kishore

LIV Subsequent Debit

Dear Guru's
I have a question regarding LIV and Subsequent Debits.
We have a Value Tolerance set of Lower 20% or £50 and upper 2% or £10 (OMR6). I have a Purchase Order for qty 1 Value £1,500. At this point no GR has taken place.
In MIRO I create an Invoice Receipt for Qty 1 at £1,400 and as expected the Invoice is Payment Blocked. Message in MIRO states GR qty equals Zero and Value below Tolerance.
However, If I now do a subsequent Debit for the remaining £100 this does not Block. I understand the value has now matched the PO, but the GR qty is still Zero.
This cause's a problem in that the original Invoice Receipt is still blocked but the Subsequent Debit is available for payment.
Is there any way i can get the Subsequent Debit to automatically Block in the above scenario.
Many Thanks
Paul Gray

A subsequent debit is designed to be used only when you have extra payment to be processed for an invoice that has already been processed and paid. Here you are talking about an invoice that is yet to paid, that is why you are facing this issue. The correct process here is to cancel the unpaid invoice and then post a new invoice for 1500 pounds.

Subsequent debit function for MRKO settlement

Hi,
We have one business requirement for one of our client,
The business requirement is ERS - Automatic invoice settlement is paid for the amount of Rs 150 for the qty of 10. After the automatic invoice settlement via using t.coe MRRL, We can able to Post the subsequent debit for the for qty of 10 and amount increased of 200 by vendor. Incase of price changed by vendor after settlement through the ERS we can post the excess amount using subsequent debit settled accordingly.
The same requirement is needed for Consignment and Pipeline settlment (MRKO) function also,but however we settled the invoice using MRKO after that in MIRO transaction not able to post the corrosponding subsequent debit.
Any other setting is require to post the subsequent debit for consignment and pipe line?
How to settle the excess amount in case of price change of consignment invoice?
- Regards,
Velu

Hi,
ERS - Automatic invoice settlement is always refer the PO .
so, you can post the Subsequent debit if price increase. because price dertermined from Purchase Order.
But MRKO. the Price determined from Info record.
If the Info record the how can we use subsequent debit option.
also MRKO is the process to intimate to consignment vendor about the cunsumption only. it won't determine any price.
Not possible to use subsequent functionality for MRKO.
SAM
Edited by: Saminathan Gopalan on Jun 23, 2010 3:04 PM

SUBSEQUENT DEBIT IN MIRO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for