Teco orders not to be allowed for confirmations

hello!
At end of the month the orders which are not taken for production has been technically closed.
Now although orders has teco status,but its allowing to confirmed the user through co11.How this can be avoided.
regards,
mangesh

Mangesh,
You can update the transaction control for system status "TECO".
Use transaction BS22 and go to system status "I0045-TECO" and double click the line, now system will take you to the maintain transaction control screen here you define the following Business Transaction with FORBIDDEN which were earlier defined as ALLOWED
RMPH - Partially Confirm order
RMRU- Confirm order
This is Think is also applicable for Maintenance orders, so please check with them also if these defination is acceptable, If NOT you have to use user status to control this.
Regards,
Prasobh

Similar Messages

ZCATS_CONF - Note 505134: Analysis report for confirmation

Hello guys
The note 505134 tells about checking the consistency of confirmations for networks, maintenance orders or service orders.
But in my installation (SAP_APPL Release 605, level 6) I cannot see this tool.
It is a transaction ? Or must I use SE38 or SA38 ?
Anyway the system says me
Transaction ZCATS_CONF does not exist
Or
Program ZCATS_CONF does not exist
Where do I am wrong?
Thanks in advance
Salvo50

Hi,
ZCATS_CONF is a program (report) so can be run from SE38. However it must first be added to the system from the note.
As the note is not yet marked valid for 605, you will need to copy it manually from the note.
-Paul

Transfer order not getting created automatically for a backflushed FERT

Hi,
I am having a strange problem. in my business process the WM system is set in such a way that the when a production order is confirmed automatic goods receipt for the FERT is done. which will automatically create a transfer requirement and convert the TR in to TO automatically and TO will be confirmed automatically.
the issue its not happening so.
when I confirm a production order its creating a TR instead of creating TR --> TO --> TO confirmation.
I tried doing manual goods receipt for the production ordeer and the process worked perfectly.
this process is not working for only one plant. and in another plant when i confirm a production order its creating a TR automatically and then tr is getting converted in to TO automatically and TO is getting confirmed automatically.
I checked all configuration and its all same for both plants.

Maintain a storage location in your delivery.

Open Purchase Orders not considered as requirement for MRP Run

Hi ,
We are facing a issue of Open Purchase orders not appeared in Stock requirements list and also it is not considered as requirement for MRP Run against reservation.
As aresult for a reservation demand of 10 units we are ending with Open POs 10 units and a additional planned order 10 units.
Material Type : ERSA
MRP Type : PD (or VB)
Lot size : EX ( HB if MRP Type is VB)
Could you please throw some light to correct our settings to MRP to consider Open POs?
Saravanan

Can you check to see if there is a re-order point set up for this materia? That could be causing the problem too.

Sales Orders not to be created for certain customers via legacy

Hi,
We have an inbound interface from legacy into SAP which creates Sales Orders in SAP. But we have a requirement where the business does not want sales orders to be created for certain customers in SAP via the interface.
To prevent the sales orders from being created for those customers via the interface, we have created entries in the look-up tables (Hope other projects also use lookup tables and are aware of what are look-up tables). But still the sales orders are being created in SAP for those customers via the interface.
What else should we do to prevent the sales orders from being created for those customers.
Thanks in advance.
Mick

Hi ABAP gurus, need your help on this one. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Purchase order not appearing as commitment for next fiscal year in KOB2

Hi Experts
Any help on this is highly appreciated.Our Fiscal year 2008 is ending on 27th september and fiscal year 2009 will start on 28th September.
We have some purchase orders created with delivery date as 30th september which falls into next fiscal year. Somehow these purchase orders are not appearing as commitments in KOB2 report even with data ranges for next fiscal year.
However we have many similar Purchase orders with delivery date in fiscal year 2008 with same internal order as account assignment and they are correctly appearing as commitments in KOB2 report.
Can you please let us know what could be the reason for purchase orders with delivery date as 30th september not appearing in KOB2 report.
Regards,
Santosh

Hi Ashok
Thanks for your continued support on this. I was going through these notes today.
One observation I made was cost elements in our system were valid till 27th september only when problematic POs were created.However their validity was subsequently extended after the creation of Purchase orders.This might be the reason for system not recognising these POs as commitments.
SAP Note 534993 seems to suggest that we need to run report RKANBU01 for all such purchase orders to redetermine commitments.I am in the process of testing this out in our systems.
Could you please let me know if my understanding is correct. Thanks again.
Regards,
Santosh

Ask for confirmation does not prompt - automator help

Hello everybody,
I wrote a simple application to mount the Media folder of my NAS. The first step is asking for confirmation as I want to make sure I am at home when my NAS is available and I do not want to continue the script when I am at work for example. Everything works fine when I test it insde automator.
I then tried to save the script as application and put in my Login items.
So when I start up I can see the little gear on top turning but there is not pop-up asking for confirmation. The script just get stuck.
Anybody know what might be the problem? When I run the application normally by clicking on it everything goes as it shoud but if it's in Login items it gets blocked at the first step and never even ask for cofnfirmation
Thanks a lot

Hi,
Is the "Hide" checkbox is checked in "System preferences" --> Accounts--> "Login items" ?
If it is checked, uncheck it.
If it still doesn't work, try this:
Remove the asking for confirmation action
Insert the "Run appleScript" action, cut all text in the action
Copy/paste this text in the action:
on run
activate
display dialog "Do you want to mount the Media folder of my NAS?"
end run

Purchase and release order not allowed for TECO work orders

Hi
We are typically setting maintenance work orders to TECO once the physical work as been performed as that sets the reference date for showing the history of when the maintenance was performed, and when the maintenance call was completed. However, we have invoices that may come in significantly later than when the physical work was performed.
Once the order is in TECO a purchase or release order (for services against a contract) cannot be created for the work order. Additionally it appears that even if we have a release order,or purchase order, if it is not for the exact amount of the invoice the release or purchase order cannot be ammended - we get the sameerror mssage (BS007) as when creating a new purchase order for the TECO order.
I had wondered about using BS22 to change TECO to continue to allow purchase and release orders when the order is in TECO status.
Any input on pros/cons or other approachs appreciated.
Philip

Thanks
That was what I initially thought. However I was informed that if the invoice is not for the originally determined amount that to post the invoice means having to change the PO, and changing the PO appears to hit the same business transaction as creating a PO, and so we get the error mssage.
The issue is that we may know we need to have services estimated at, say, $5.000. But we do not know what the actual final invoice will be. So the actual amount may end up being $4,500 or $5,500 as an example, and it may come ni late from the vendor. The Purchse Order side is not my expertize, but I am being informed that the invoice must match the PO amount, otherwise the PO must be ammended to match. As the order is in TECO, the user cannot amend the PO.
I would be happy to know of other options, or at least good questions to ask. I want the end user to be able to post the invoice against the PO, after the order is in TECO, even it the invoice amount is not exactly the same as what was originally anticipated.
regards
Philip

After TECO system not allow any transaction for orders

Dear all,
We have taken TECO for Production / Process orders but system is allowing to cancel confirmation / to cancel GRN / to cancel operations.
Actually we dont want to cancel any of the above said after TECO.
How to restrict this one. Explain very clearly if it is possible.
Thanks,
Regards,
Sakthivel.S

Hi sakthi vel
You should go to transaction BS22, then click on status I0045
After that change RMRU, RMWA and RMWF from Allowed to Forbidd.
The problem will be solved.
Regards
Dinh Trung Tin

With out goods issue for order system should not allow for order confirmati

Dear all
with out goods issue system should not allow for order/operation confirmation.
how it is possible.
Regrads
Srinivas

Dear ,
In some cases we required to do confirmation or TECO without GI .
We can change it as per req using user exit
Regards,
Ishwar

Que-''actual activity allocation is not allowed for order .''

hi ,
During confirmation of operation at co11n (also at co11), got one error massage i.e "actual activity allocation is not allowed for order "
Due to this error confirmation is not possible .
pls help me to solve this problem.
AMOL WAGH
Edited by: amol wagh on Dec 6, 2008 8:09 PM
Edited by: amol wagh on Dec 6, 2008 8:10 PM

Dear,
For allocation activity costs, we need to define activity type in KL01 by specifying the unit of measurement of the particular activity type (like machine - Hours etc.). While creating activity type, we will assign a secondary cost element (with category 43) in the activity type through which the activity cost will flow.
After that we will plan for cost center in KP06 (cost elementwise). Then we will plan machine hours in KP26 where we will link the activity type to a particular cost center.
Please give the feed back.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Actual activity allocation is not allowed for order .

hi ,
During confirmation of operation at co11n (also at co11), got one error massage i.e "actual activity allocation is not allowed for order "
Due to this error confirmation is not possible .
pls help me to solve this problem.
AMOL WAGH

Dear,
What is message number? Did you assign the usersttus in BS02?
For allocation activity costs, we need to define activity type in KL01 by specifying the unit of measurement of the particular activity type (like machine - Hours etc.). While creating activity type, we will assign a secondary cost element (with category 43) in the activity type through which the activity cost will flow.
After that we will plan for cost center in KP06 (cost elementwise). Then we will plan machine hours in KP26 where we will link the activity type to a particular cost center.
When we do price calculation in KSPI, system checks the planned costs for cost center (in KP06) and also checks the machine hours planned (in KP26) and gives the cost for the particular activity type.
Please check the above in the system
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Can i config not allow to TECO Order if order have list in COGI?

Dear any senior.
Can i config not allow to TECO Order if order have list in COGI?
i want to restrict user to can't not TECO order if have any material in COGI.
help me please.

Dear,
If there is COGI post processing error system give you the message There are still reprocessing records. Set order to technically complete?
Best practice is that first check post processing error and then go ahead for COHV.
Please refer this thread.
Re: COGI problem-Unusual
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Invoice is not allowed for order 00065

Hi experts,
This error is relating to the Accounts payables(SAP). The error occurred and the invoice has fallen out from ERP (SAP) while posting the invoice. The error is "no invoice is allowed for order 00065".
some Inputs: if you go to ME23N screen line item details invoice tab you can find the check boxes like Incoming Invoice, cost centre and Order. Usually for a particular PO incoming invoice and cost centre check boxes will be checked but in this case Order check box is checked and the invoice has fallen out from ERP.
Could any body please let me know how to resolve this issue in SAP. I'm not FI/CO consultant but SAP BW if I know i can guide team.
Thanks in advance,
amarnath

Dear,
What is message number? Did you assign the usersttus in BS02?
For allocation activity costs, we need to define activity type in KL01 by specifying the unit of measurement of the particular activity type (like machine - Hours etc.). While creating activity type, we will assign a secondary cost element (with category 43) in the activity type through which the activity cost will flow.
After that we will plan for cost center in KP06 (cost elementwise). Then we will plan machine hours in KP26 where we will link the activity type to a particular cost center.
When we do price calculation in KSPI, system checks the planned costs for cost center (in KP06) and also checks the machine hours planned (in KP26) and gives the cost for the particular activity type.
Please check the above in the system
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Goods receipt for purchase order not allowed for a particular wbs

hello everybody..
Am creating a good receipt for a purchase order using the T-CODE-: MIGO...
While doing so am getting an error as " goods receipt for purchase order not allowed(wbs element)".
What can be done to rectify this error?
Plz do help me....
Regards,
Deepika
Moderator message: not directly related to ABAP development, please have a look in the appropriate functional forum, study the long text of this error message.
Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Dec 1, 2010 5:52 PM

Hi Br. Ajay M,
Released the order and Status line as follow
REL AVAC BUDG GMPS
but the error changed while reverse the document
item 0001 Order is invalid.
Many thanks for your kindly reply.
regards,
Steven

Teco orders not to be allowed for confirmations

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for