Cost from SO
Hi,
Can any one explain the scenario when Production Order comes into picture during Assenbly Processing.
How the Prod Order get trigger and how the cost will flow in PS.
And is it possible to transfer cost from sale order to projects??
Regards
Hi,
In my opinion, if you trigger PP order from SO, PS wont come into picture. The scenario will be 'Made to Order'. If you trigger Network then PS will play imp role. If possible, you could eleiminate PP order and carry out production with help of network order itself.
Regards
Similar Messages
-
Sales order - show total plan costs (from production order) on sales order
Hi all,
I have the following question/scenario:
We create prodction order to collect cost (hours) for a service. There exists also a material master for this service.
The confirmed hours are posted on the production order and then setteld to the respective sales order (settlement rule SDI).
What to I have to maintain/customize to show the total plan cost (for the service) on gthe sales order?
If I check the sales order via VA03 --> environment --> cost report , I can see the planned sales revenue but no planned costs?
(the actual value flows work so far, postings via settlement or billing document).
I hope the topic is understandable. Any ideas?
Thanks in advance.
Edited by: Butch66 on Sep 27, 2010 7:07 PM
Edited by: Butch66 on Sep 27, 2010 7:08 PMHi
Planned costs from prod order can not show on sale order.. Both are 2 separate entities in their own respects
Unless you calculate sales order cost estimate on your sales order, you cant see planned costs on sale order...
To calculate sale order cost estimate, make settings in your requirement class...
1. Go to procurement tab of sale order
2. See whats the requirement type
3. Go to IMG > Controlling > Prod cost Contr > Cost Obj Contr > Prod Cost by Sales Order > Control of Requirements
4. Here you can see mapping of req type to req class....
5. If you want to have sales order costing and have sales order as CO object inorder to have sales order wise profitability, you should have following settings in Req class...
>Acct Assignment Category should be E
>Costing: Either Blank or X
>Costing Id and Costing Method: As per your requirement
Regards
Ajay M -
How to transfer cost from old sales order (cancelled) to new sales order
Hi Gurus
I want to know, how to move cost from one sales order to another sales order.
SD created sales order before 1 month and there was production order behind this. Production was completed and all the cost was moved to sales order and also SD has raised invoice on customer. This transaction was completed.
The above order was rejected by customer due to some changes in the order. SD raised another sales order and production order was created to to additional work. Production transfered above stock (produce before on old production order) to new production order.
My problem is stock is now transfered to new production order but cost is still sitting on old sales order. How do I transfer cost from old sales order to new sales order. SD cancelled old invoice and raised new one with full value (old + new work) on new sales order. Now cost is on old sales order and revenue is on new sales order.
Please help.
ThanksHi
I have reverse the sales order settlement, PP order settlement to sales order and I have also done KB11N for transfering the cost to the new production order.
The only problem is I was unable to transfer labour hour confirmation as cost element used for this are not for transfering cost. If I will reverse the confirmation in PP order system will reverse material movement also which I don't want any more. Can you please tell me how to I reverse the Labour hours with out affecting goods movement?
Many thanks -
Report to fetch Actual cost from a service order
Hi Gurus,
The requirement is to create a report to fecth the actual cost from the maintenance order. ie.. material cost , labor cost and some other costs which are directly posted to the order. Can anybody let me know from which tables I can pull the material cost , labor cost ..etc posted against maintenance order?
Regards,
JohnJohn,
Have a look in table PMCO
PeteA -
How to Allocate Costs from One Dimension to Another
I am attempting allocate costs from the department to the Production line within a location.
I have 8 dimensions in my BSO Essbase cube.
The dimensions are as follows.
Accounts
Period
Scenario
Version
Years
Location
Department
Product
What I need to do is as follows.
i.e.
Department 100 = $1,000 UDA = Variable Expense
Department 100 = $2,000 UDA = Fixed Expense
Line 1 = 30% of Dept 100 Costs where UDA = Variable Expense = $300
Line 2 = 25% of Dept 100 Costs where UDA = Variable Expense = $250
Line 3 = 45% of Dept 100 Costs where UDA = Variable Expense = $450
Sum of Lines = $1,000 where UDA = Variable Expense
Line 1 = 10% of Dept 100 Costs where UDA = Fixed Expense = $200
Line 2 = 15% of Dept 100 Costs where UDA = Fixed Expense = $300
Line 3 = 75% of Dept 100 Costs where UDA = Fixed Expense = $1,500
Sum of Lines = $2,000 where UDA = Fixed Expense
And of course my situation is much more complex as the % will change with each scenario, period, versions, department combination.
I have created distribution % accounts within the accounts dimension to distribute between my 3 main production lines. Which is within the alternate dimension of the Location dimension.
I am on Essbase 9.2.0.3, Win 32 bit.
Can someone suggest how to do this?
Thank you in advance for your help.
DanAllow me to further explain my needs.
I have the following Input.
Version = Current
Scenario = Actuals
Year = FY12
Location = L_01
Product = No_Product
Dept Acct Jan Feb Mar
D_100 A_6001 100 110 120 UDA = Var Spend from Accounts dimension
D_100 A_6002 200 210 220 UDA = Fix Spend from Accounts dimension
D_100 A_6003 300 310 320 UDA = Var Spend from Accounts dimension
D_101 A_6004 400 410 420 UDA = Fix Spend from Accounts dimension
D_101 A_6005 500 510 520 UDA = Var Spend from Accounts dimension
D_101 A_6006 600 610 620 UDA = Fix Spend from Accounts dimension
Totals 2,100 2,160 2,220
The calculated totals for Dept/UDA for Fix,Var would be as follows based on above inputs.
Dept Jan Feb Mar
D_100 400 420 440 UDA = Var Spend from Accounts dimension
D_100 200 210 220 UDA = Fix Spend from Accounts dimension
D_101 500 510 520 UDA = Var Spend from Accounts dimension
D_101 1,000 1,020 1,040 UDA = Fix Spend from Accounts dimension
I need to allocate the above using % per Department -> Location -> UDA(Account) -> Period
Dept Line Jan Feb Mar
D_100 Line 1 10% 15% 20% Var Spend
D_100 Line 2 20% 25% 30% Var Spend
D_100 Line 3 70% 60% 50% Var Spend
Allocation % 100% 100% 100%
D_101 Line 1 15% 25% 35% Var Spend
D_101 Line 2 20% 30% 40% Var Spend
D_101 Line 3 65% 45% 25% Var Spend
Allocation % 100% 100% 100%
D_100 Line 1 40% 30% 20% Fix Spend
D_100 Line 2 30% 20% 10% Fix Spend
D_100 Line 3 30% 50% 70% Fix Spend
Allocation % 100% 100% 100%
D_101 Line 1 100% 0% 0% Fix Spend
D_101 Line 2 0% 100% 0% Fix Spend
D_101 Line 3 0% 0% 100% Fix Spend
Allocation % 100% 100% 100%
I have created a statistical accounts for these % named as follows.
Alloc_Fix_D100_Line1 Alloc_Fix_D101_Line1
Alloc_Fix_D100_Line2 Alloc_Fix_D101_Line2
Alloc_Fix_D100_Line3 Alloc_Fix_D101_Line2
Alloc_Var_D100_Line1 Alloc_Var_D101_Line1
Alloc_Var_D100_Line2 Alloc_Var_D101_Line2
Alloc_Var_D100_Line3 Alloc_Var_D101_Line2
The Line 1, Line 2, and Line 3 are alternate hierarchies within the Location dimension.
The needed script is to produce the output below.
Line UDA Dept Jan Feb Mar
Line 1 Var Spend D_100 40 (400 * 10%) 63 (420 * 15%) 88 (440 * 20%)
Line 2 Var Spend D_100 80 (400 * 20%) 105 (420 * 25%) 132 (440 * 30%)
Line 3 Var Spend D_100 280 (400 * 70%) 252 (420 * 60%) 220 (440 * 50%)
Total Total 400 (40+80+280) 420 (63+105+252) 440 (88+132+220)
Line 1 Var Spend D_101 75 (500 * 15%) 128 (510 * 25%) 182 (520 * 35%)
Line 2 Var Spend D_101 100 (500 * 20%) 153 (510 * 30%) 208 (520 * 40%)
Line 3 Var Spend D_101 325 (500 * 65%) 230 (510 * 45%) 130 (520 * 25%)
Allocation % 500 (75+100+325) 510 (128+153+230)520 (182+208+130)
Line 1 Fix Spend D_100 80 (200 * 40%) 63 (210 * 30%) 44 (220 * 20%)
Line 2 Fix Spend D_100 60 (200 * 30%) 42 (210 * 20%) 22 (220 * 10%)
Line 3 Fix Spend D_100 60 (200 * 30%) 105 (210 * 50%) 154 (220 * 70%)
Allocation % 200 (80+60+60) 210 (63+42+105) 220 (44+22+154)
Line 1 Fix Spend D_101 1000 (1000*100%) 0 (1020* 0%) 0 (1040* 0%)
Line 2 Fix Spend D_101 0 (1000* 0%) 1020 (1020*100%) 0 (1040* 0%)
Line 3 Fix Spend D_101 0 (1000* 0%) 0 (1020* 0%) 1040 (1040*100%)
Allocation % 1,000 (1,000+0+0 1,020 (0+1,020+0) 1,040 (0+0+1,040)
The ultimate goal is to see the same departmental expenses by Variable/Fixed Spendings for each Line.
Thank you,
Dan -
How to transfer costs from one WBS to another WBS?
Hi,
I want to transfer costs from one WBS to another. Remember two currencies are maintained viz. local and group.
So how can i transfer the balance such that both the local currency and group currency balance gets transferred.
Please ensure that the transfer should show 0 balance outstanding in CJI3 report.
I need to transfer because WBS is holding some value which was not settled in the previous year.Hi
You can transfer the Amount from One WBS to Another through KB11N. In this you Choose the Screen Variant as "_WBS/Network_" and do necessary steps.
Hope it helps.
Regards
Babu -
Secondary costs from WBS to an AuC
Hi,
1. I have executed Assessment[KSU5] that actually settled costs from secondary cost element[800099] to a WBS element [AAA]
2. Now I am trying to settle costs [which is secondary] from WBS element [AAA] to an AuC using CJ88 and I am getting below error
3. Just for info in allocation structure Z1, I have given settlement cost element for WBS, but still I am getting below error
Any advises/ideas, thanks
Complete allocation structure Z1
Message no. KD503
Diagnosis
During settlement, the system puts the sender debits into groups (assignments), which are settled using the same settlement cost element. The settlement assignment is made in the allocation structure, which is stored in the settlement rule for the sender (under settlement parameters).
Cost element 800099 cannot be assigned to a settlement cost assignment in allocation structure Z1, and therefore it cannot be assigned to a settlement cost element.
Procedure
Possible solutions are as follows:
If the posting under cost element 800099 was made to the sender because of an incorrect entry, and you can reverse the posting, and do not need to update the allocation structure. You only need to reverse the incorrectly assigned posting before repeating the settlement. Exception: For an investment measure with a line item settlement, you need to extend the allocation structure, even after the reversal.
If the posting was made correctly, you can do the following:
a) You can assign a different allocation structure to the sender: In the master data maintenance for the sender, choose "Settlement rule -> Goto -> Settlement parameters" and then enter a different allocation structure.
If necessary, also check whether the correct allocation structure is entered in the settlement profile. The allocation structure is defaulted in the settlement profile when you create sender master data or when you maintain the settlement rule.
You can update allocation structure Z1
Regards,
Sri
Edited by: Sridhar Nagavarapu on Jul 4, 2008 12:45 AM
Edited by: Sridhar Nagavarapu on Jul 4, 2008 12:47 AMThrough MM, contract is created (ME31N) whereby the settlement G/L accounts are identified.
The contract then is released through MM with TCode ME21N which prompts Commitment Costs to be entered, after which the Service Entry Sheet SES through TCode ME81L which then automatically updates into the WBS.
Through WBS, CJ88 would be the TCode you would have to use for settlement.
Hope this helps.
Thanks. -
Distribution of Costs from CCA to CO-PA
Hi All,
Can someone please help me find a solution to the following scenario?
There is a requirement to distribute costs from CCA to Cust/Prod level in CO-PA.
*The cost allocations factors can only be provided at the Customer Group/Product level.
*Using regular assessment cycles in CO-PA it is possible to distribute these costs to Customer Group/Product level.
*However these costs are to be distributed further to the Customer/Product level in CO-PA based on the revenue value field.
Any suggestions on how this can be done? Can I use top down distribution?
Regards,
KKOption 1:
Step 1 - create assessment to COPA (KEU1). Ensure that you enter customer group and product in the receiver characteristics (second tab)
Step 2- use top down distribution to distribute from customer group to customer.
Please refer to SAP help on top down distribution to see how top-down distribution works if you want to retain 'product' characteristics. They have given examples.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2004/helpdata/en/7a/4c48c64a0111d1894c0000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
Second option:
Step 1 - Carry out top down distribution of the cost allocation factors from customer group/product to customer/group.
Step 2 - Create assessment cycles at customer/product level.
Second option may be a better solution from data volume point of view beacsue top-down-distribution creates two records for sender and receiver in COPA. I am assuming that number of records for top down distribution of cost allocation factors will be less as compared to top down distribution of actual costs from multiple cost centers.
Hope it helps.
Regards, -
Reposting cost from one value field to another value field in CO-PA
Good day,
Some of our FI postings to CO-PA were assigned to the wrong value field (in the PA transfer structure, the cost elements were in the wrong group and thus were recorded at the wrong value field).
The number of documents invilved is huge - so we cannot reverse, change the configuration and post again.
Is there a way to repost the costs from one VF to another like we can do with other cost objects?
Thanks,
Yoel.Hi,
Please to the below thread on this aspect:
Value Field adjustment program
Regards,
Kiron Kumar T. -
WBS element is updated while settling cost from WBS to AUC
Hi Experts
At the time of settlement , when we settling the cost from WBS to AUC , WBS element is updated in AUC line item of accounting document , but it should not be updated actually.
As result AUC cost is loaded on WBS and budget of WBS is get affected , furthermore system is not allowing for MIGO even budget is available but in CJ30 it is showing assigned value is more then original budget.
Please suggest.
Thanks & Regards
shaileshHi Saurabh ,
I totally agree with you , but in our case system is not allowing(Error Message: Budget Exceeded) MIGO against capex PO - > WBS.
Note : in our case , system is checking budget at the time of MIGO also.
in our case , report S_ALR_87013558 is showing wrong actual value and also in CJ30 , total assigned value is larger then total distributable budget , As result our available budget gets negative figure in report S_ALR_87013558 , even i have already run CJEN->CJBN 2 or 3 times.
Note: Our Commitment value is correct.
Actually , according to report S_ALR_87013542 , system is showing correct actual value , that means we have sufficient available budget for further MIGO's
Now may be , due to WBS element is updated in AUC line item of accouning document of settlement (WBS to AUC) , system loads AUC values to WBS unnecessarily , our available budget gets negative figure.
For your reference , i am attaching screen shot of accounting document which is generated at the time of settlement from WBS to AUC. -
TX CNS41 - settled cost from internal order to WBS element not displayed
Hi PS Expets,
I have a question regarding transaction CNS41 "Structure Overview" where cost settled from an internal order is not displayed in in the report for a selected project. This is in a ECC version 5.0
Settled costs from internal orders are posted with transaction type KOAO on WBS elements and when you check report RCNSTFCO you can see that the following transaction types are deselected when executing transaction CNS41:
delete t_rpsco_m where vorga = 'KOAO' "< insert
or vorga = 'KOAL' "< insert
or vorga = 'KOAP' "< insert
or vorga = 'KOAQ' "< insert
or vorga = 'KOAR'."< insert
CALL FUNCTION 'HFPM_RPSCO_TO_RPSCO_LIS_CONV'
This is implemented according to OSS note 51971 in order to eliminate internal business volume in the project structure when executing a PS hierarchy report.
But this also eliminate the display of the cost from the internal order.
Any ideas or a work around in order to display settled cost from an internal order on a WBS element in transaction CNS41
Kind regards,
AnneHello Tison.
I guess you have the Project created with a BAPI in your system in background. As far as I have seen I'd try the following in ABAP to create Partners in the Project Definition: BAPI_BUS2001_PARTNER_CREATE_M or the corresponding method ProjectDefinitionPI.PartnerCreateMultiple. This should happen in background when the Project is created also.
Best regards.
Jens Schmid -
Is it possible to change the costing from moving average to standard??
hey all,
i wana know is it possible to change the costing from moving average to standard or vice-versa in the item master??
cheersHi Satish
Please look at the documentation from SAP for using this function. I just looked on my drive and can't find the document I used to have for this.
Just setting quantities to zero will not work as all open P/O, S/O, etc must also be closed before you can run the Inventory Valuation Method function. This is all detailed in the document.
I have done this successfully before for a client with over 4000 items, so I have been through the process. Please let me know if you need assistance.
Kind regards
Peter Juby -
Move costs from WBS to another
Dear Gurus,
I kindly ask you to tell me how can I move some costs (hour of personnel type of cost S43...) from a WBS on a project to a WBS on another project.
I know I can use KB21N: in that way I have to pull out costs from a WBS though the costs center and then do another movement in order to charge the costs on the WBS receiver always thourgh the cost center.
Is there a way to do it directly?
Thanks a lot!
SaraS43.. is of type indirect activity allocation,cost element category 43, hence can be used only with reference to activity allocation. Please use any other cost element, be it primary or secondary.
Or else you could cancel the original activity allocation through KB67 and renter through KB21N. You may also want to try reposting of activity allocation posting through KB65.
For number range, go to transaction KANK and enter the controlling area. Then click on Change groups icon on top left. Click on binoculars and search for KAMV (Manual Cost Allocation) This is SAP standard and most likely you will find it. -
Allocation of cost from one profit center group to various profit centr gr
Hi Experts,
Here we created one profit center as group function having various cost centers like common function Admin,Accounts,Legal,HR etc. Now we want to allocate the the cost from group function to various profit center group.
Kindly give your valuable solution.
J.FrancisHi,
The allocation can be done through Distribution either in a fixed value or in percentages. You can define a planning
cycle for a sender profit center group and define the amount to be allocated to receiver profit center group.
Define Actual cycle in the same way. In periodic processing which may be every month/quarterly/half yearly,
you can distribute the values from one group to the other.
Best Regards,
Sadashivan -
Secondary cost from WBS to AUC
Hi All,
I am facing a problem in posting secondary costs from WBS to AUC.
In Project systems they are considering secondary costs from the activities in the network. i settled the cost from network to WBS. and when i tried to settle From wbs to AUC system is asking for settlement costelement for secondary cost. But the secondary cost should be settled to costcenter but not to AUC.
Please suggest how can we do the settlement from WBS to AUC. How to handle settlement of secondary costs in this scenario.
Any help will be greatly appriciated.
Rgds,
Kumar.Through MM, contract is created (ME31N) whereby the settlement G/L accounts are identified.
The contract then is released through MM with TCode ME21N which prompts Commitment Costs to be entered, after which the Service Entry Sheet SES through TCode ME81L which then automatically updates into the WBS.
Through WBS, CJ88 would be the TCode you would have to use for settlement.
Hope this helps.
Thanks. -
Settlement of labour cost from sales contract order to CO-PA
Hi Gurus,
Could you please explain how the calculation is made while settling the labour cost from sales cotract order to CO-PA.
Thanks and Regards
RCHi,
Basically the labour cost will be contained in a cost element. When you settle the sales order to COPA your settlement profile will contain the PA transfer structure where the cost elements are mapped to the value fields. Accordingly the labour cost will flow into the value field in COPA.
regards
Waman
Maybe you are looking for
-
HT201303 How can i remove my credit card from my apple id
How can i remove my credit card from my apple id
-
My iPhone 4 won't run any apps.
When I click on an app it immediately goes back to the homescreen. The only apps that work are the ones that came on the phone. Is there something I need to fix?
-
Hello, can anybody tell me how to change standard texts in sales documents (in my case: vbka)? Thanks, Cristina
-
I need tp refund In-app-purchased that I paid but it can't download.
I need tp refund In-app-purchased that I paid but it can't download. but i tried to report problem and it not wor. please help. Thank you.
-
Why does VZW not support Yahoo Msgr on the Palm Devices????
Does anyone know the answer to this and/or a work around?? I love my pixi, but I truly miss my Yahoo! IM.. The Palm devices on the Sprint Network have it.. Why don't we???