PM Order control

Dear experts,
In PP we have order type dependent parameter.Is there order type dependent parameter for plant maintenance.I want to set Reservation/Purch.Req to immediate.where we can do this for order type in plant maintenance.Please give navigation path or T-Code.
Regards,
Rajesh.

hi
you can use the T code OIOE or you can use the path IMG>Plant Maintenance and Customer Service>Maintenance and Service Processing>Maintenance and Service Orders>Functions and Settings for Order Types>Define Change Docs, Collective Purc. Req. Indicator, Operation No. Interval
regards
thyagarajan

Similar Messages

DBM Order Control configuration steps..

Hi All,
We have got a requirement and need to create new Events/Actions etc in Order Control.
Since I am new to DBM, I need some guidance to configure actions etc under Order Control.
I am trying to search on net but not getting some comprehensive document.
If someone has any document or link having config steps etc ,pls share with me.
Regards,
SB

Hi,
all information you need should be found in Steffens post
INFO - General DBM Cookbooks / Consulting Notes / Guides / etc.
BR
Robert

MTO Sales order controlling with valuated stock

Hi,
In SAP MTO with sales order controlling (sales order is cost object) with valuated stock, how to make settlement rule set to sales order so that costs will flow from production order to sales order .
Can anybody advise me in this.
Regards
Rajesh A

Hi Rajesh,
I'm new to Engineer To Order (ETO) and Make To Order (MTO) Product Costing and my client like to implement ETO and MTO product costing with Project Systems(PS) integration.
If you worked on these proccess? please can you guide me how to design the process or could you please forward me design and configuration documents....my client is discrete manufacturing industry.
Thanks,
Rau

First order control system for proportional valves

I am working on a proportional valve control program. We have four gas lines and it is desired to send four different gases through a combustion chamber sequentially. The close time for each valve is determined by the pressure measurement inside the combustion chamber. For instance, firstly, we let the nitrogen gas flows to the chamber, and the pressure inside the of it reaches 5 bars, we closed the nitrogen valve, and open the argon gas valve, and hold it opened until the pressure is reached at 15 bars inside the chamber and so on.
I was thinking on utilizing PID for control of these valves, however, one author from my institute said that you can not do this with a PID program, you can do that with a first order control system. Because in the system, it is not allowable to gases exceed their set points (set pressure values). PID controls the system with osilations around set point and after it provides the set value, but in this case, we are not allowed to exceed the set point (we may reach the set point slowly and asymptotically, but never exceed it).
I have not background on controlling hence I need your help. Could I do that with Labview? Is there a first order system control module in Control & Simulation Toolkit? And also where can I find examples, tutorials, etc. -if there are- about first order system controlling? Thanks in advance.
Egemen

what you are trying to do can be done with PID, but you would need to tune it to avoid overshot. But, most importantly, the use of the closed-loop PID will guarantee that your system will follow the setpoint, which can be a ramp going from the 0 to 100 % of the valve. The ramp on setpoint is a typical control technique to avoid overshoot of the system.
Now, if you look in the PID palette under Control and Simulation, you will see the function called "Lead-Lag". This function is a 'first order' system and you can define a pole and a zero for your system. If your objective is just make the change smooth, you can make the Lead-Lag to work as a "Lag" (make the lead zero) and apply to your system. here is an example:
C:\Program Files (x86)\National Instruments\LabVIEW 2014\examples\control\PID\Simulation - Lead-Lag.vi
If you need something more complicated than Lead-Lag, than I would you advice to use the LabVIEW Control Design and Simulation Module. There you can really develop more advanced controllers, like higher order filters or Model Predictive Control. But this also requires you to have a better knowledge of control theory...
Barp - Control and Simulation Group - LabVIEW R&D - National Instruments

Capacity profile in order control spro

hi
in order control of pm spro
capacity profile-field
i fnd generally people left it bank
can i manintain the all the capacity(man) of maintenace in profile
and put it here
so capacity avalabilty check for manpower i can do
this is what i know
if iam wrong please correct me and also give some idea how to use this field
thank you

1. In Capacity tab page, use
Other Formula - SAP008 (Proj: Reqtmns in Prcng). This relates to the internal Calculation of Available Capacity by system.
2. Overload - in Percentage
eg) Available Capacity of the Work Center is 100 mhrs. If you set Overload as 10%, the work center can be loaded with 110 mhrs. That means, in Maintenance Order the Work Center can be loaded 110 mhrs per day. If the Capacity requirement Crosses 110 mhrs, sysytem will throw message according to the IMG setting.
3. If we set the Indicator Relevant to finite scheduling,
we will have the flexibility to continue with MO processing even though the Work Center is Over loaded (If you have this option, during the pop up meesage by system at the time of overloading, we can manually adjust the Capacity and proceed with the process)
4. Can be used by several Operations -
Capacity of Work Center id 100 mhrs. Capacity requirement for One Operation in an Order is 50 mhrs. In this case, if you have not selected the "Can be used " option, remaining 50mhrs can not be utilized for the whole day by any other Operation. So it ie advisable to enable this option, so that maximum utilzation can be done.
5. Long Term Planning -
As the name indicates, it is basically to plan the Capacity Requirements/assignments in long term.
eg) Planning of Spares, Man power in a Maintenance Plan
Hope this will solve ur clarification.
Regards
Sam

Purchase Order Controlled by Release Budget Amount.

Dear Friend's
I have created project upto level 2 wbs element.with ext services.
In Budgeting,
In CJ30 Tcode i have allocated budget Rs.100000/-
In CJ32 Tcode i have released above mentioned same amount for WBS 1.
In Purchase Ordering,
While creating PO In ME21N Tcode i have taken services for WBS 1 for which PO net amount is more than Rs.100000/-
When i go for saving of PO.The system must show Error "PO Amount is more than Released Budget.
Pls tell me the customizing setting for above mentioned scenario.By doing this setting system must show error while saving PO.
Pls help me urgently.
Thanks & Regards,
Sandeep N.Theurkar

Sandeep,
As far as I see, all the customizing settings are correct in this case. But just to summarize, please make sure:
a) In budgeting profile (OPS9) make sure flag "releases" is set
b) In CJ32 verify you have released budget for the WBS element (or superior)
c) In CJ02 verify that status BUDG and AVAC are active for the WBS element
d) In customizing path Project System > Costs > Budget > Define Tolerance Limits make sure you have entered the necessary tolerance limits for your budgeting profile. At least, one entry with Activity group ++, action 3 and usage 100,00 is necessary in your case.
e) In OPTK transaction, please make sure you have not included any cost element for your controlling area.
f) In ME22N make sure the PO is correctly account assigned to the WBS element
Once all this is done, please run CJBN and retest.
If you still don´t get the error when posting the PO, please send the output of BPFCTRA0 report
Hope this helps
Regards
Martina

The financial document and sales order control is missing at delivery order

The financial document is assigned at sales order line. The system is not restricting to deliver the goods of cost less than or equal to value of financial document.
Suppose a financial document with a value of 10000USD is assigned to a sales order of value 20000.In this case system is letting me to make the delivery order and PGI of cost 20000.I want the system to restrict to deliver the items of cost 10000USD.
Note=In xd01 i have mentioned the payment guarantee procedure=Letter of credit but not the credit control area.
Regards :Vijay

Hi,
1st check your FD to determine whether or not there is an allowed overdraft. If there isnt one than check IMG Tx VX52, Finnancial Document Conditions, check value:
"Even if you do not set this switch - that is, there is no value check in the SD document -, the system subtracts the consumed values from the total value of the financial document.
In this case, the subtracted value may exceed the total value of the financial document because the check, but not the update, is deactivated."
Regards
Kikas

Stock transport Order control

Hi Experts,
Need advice on this.
My company is currently using STO to transfer stock between 2 plants belong to 2 different company codes. Due to this, the PO type that we use will be NB instead of the usual UB. This is based on the SAP configuration guide found in SPRO.
   Due to this, the PO raised is actually a normal PO that the user can actually send to other vendors (not the interco vendor).
    We are considering having a new PO type for STO only. Even if we do that, we are not able to find anything in config that allow us to control such that user will not raise to other vendors (non interco vendor) accidentatlly.
     We are quite reluctant to code in the user exit. Based on SAP standard, am I missing anything out here that cause the PO type (dedicated solely for STO), to ensure that the only vendor raised is an interco vendor?
      We need this urgently as I had spent too much time exploring on my own instead of coming here fast to seek expert advice.
       Thanks.

Hi,
To avoid incorrect usage of document type, if business permits, the documnet type for general purchase from vendors may be configured as userdefined doc. type with Z, inorder to differentiate from the cross-company code stock transport order (NB).
As such while using the document type NB for the cross-company code STO, the field for vendor is automatically gets changed to "Supplying plant" which clearly diferentiates from the vendor purchases.
Thanks & Regards,
Amjad

Monthly Production Order controlled by week

Hello,
How can I have in a single Production Order created for a month and have full control over BOM components by week?
We have a cockpit were the user only as to input the quantities that has been produced, for that monthly Order, but the client only wants the cockpit to shown the quantities that he is suppose to produce on that particular week. Is there a way to do this, can I've in the same order the quantities that I'm suppose to use per week, or do they have to create weekly Production Orders instead of monthly orders?
Thanks,
BMO.

Dear Bruno,
If you are having monthly requirement after taking MRP run you will be getting one planned order and convert this planned
order's partially (may be 3 or 4 ) into production order's through T Code CO48 as per your requirement and release the same
and perform GI and confirmation and GR.
Check and revert back.
Regards
Mangalraj.S

Sales Order Control

Dear All,
How can we control the Consignment Fillup Order in sauch a way that if the order quatity is not available in the plant the order should not be delivered and quantity corrected at order level
With Regards
Mohammed

Dear Kapil
if the material is partially available the system is issuing a warning based on the stock but it is allowing the delivery to be created for the partial quantity
what we need is that if there is a shortage of quantity then the system should not let the delivery to be created.
only complete deliveries should be allowed
Regards
Mohammed

Production Order Control

Hi ,
In Production order the User name can be selected from header of the table.
We did a SP_transaction notification like only manager can do some exceptions which other users can buy pointing to UserSign of Owor. it worked fine.
Problem is, now the other users found the breach, like changing the user name to Manager and doing those exceptions. unable to control this, do any one have new idea to overcome this?
I thought i wud be better in case if we cud catch the current loggin user n check with those exception conditions, so tht only in manager loggin can do those things.
i dont know how to get the thing done... plz help!!
Thanks

Restrict user name visibilty of production order thru form settings.
De tick User Name.
and also apply authorization General ---> Document Settings ---> No authorization

Production order control data tab

Hi,
Is there any chance the costing data under control data tab in production order can make out "grayed" so that users can not change costing sheet, RA key.
Thanks in advance.

Dear Sprint,
Try with SHD0, make the field as display only
[http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/Snippets/TransactionVariant-AStepbyStepGuidefor+Creation]
[http://sapfunctional.com/General/ScreenVariants/Index.htm]
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/7d/f639fb015111d396480000e82de14a/content.htm]
If possible take help from technical person
Regards
Madhu

Production Order (Control Key)

Hi All,
Scenario: At present after the MRP run, a planned order is created for materials which are to be manufactured in-house & it is then converted to a production order. A control key is being automatically selected for the operation. I would like to know from where is this control key being selected. The material does not have a routing. Is there any configuration settings i need to change, as the control key which is being automatically selected at present is not the correct one, i would like to select another control key & make it default for this material. Await for inputs
Vivek

Hi again,
If i create a routing in the development server, how do i then make the transport to the qualification server. I know SE10 is used for transport requests, but i do not know wat steps i need to take before i make the request using SE10, can you give your inputs for this?
Vivek

Internal Order - control data tab

i have an io that has cost center as statistical . so anything that posts, is first posting to the IO and 2nd posting statistically to the cost center. If i want to change the cost center, i can do that on the assignment tab BUT that cost center doesnt update the control data tab--which is where the stat posting goes.
is this something that can be changed or does a new IO need to be created?
thanks!

Hi
To change the cost center in the control tab of internal order master apply OSS Note 198036.Note that the cost center given here have the real postings and the internal order have the statistical postings.
Regards
Sandy.

IDoc ORDERS - Control Agent responsible

Is there a way to control who will be receiving a work item based on the sales organization in IDoc type ORDERS?
We have some Customers extended to multiple sales organizations.
We would have 1 CSR per sales organization.
However, in WE20, the post processing permitted agent is Customer specific.
We are presently maintaining a position as agent type in WE20.
We assign all possible CSR's user ID to this position via PPOM.
As a result, when a work item is generated, ALL CSRs are getting a work item (evern when it does not belong to them).
How could we be more specific and, based on the sales organization inside the IDoc, only send the work item to the business workplace of the affected CSR ?
We are on ECC5
Thank you for your assistance,
Arnaud

1. I created 1 org unit via PO10.
2. To which I assigned 2 positions created via PO13. To both positions, I maintained the infotype SAP Organizational Object with both SAP org. object type BUS0006, BUS0006001 and BUS0006003. The sales org value is unique to each posistion. (I.e.: Position P1 is for sales org 1111 and Position P2 for sales org 2222).
3. I assigned a unique SAP user ID to each position.
When I reprocess a faulty 850, the work item appears in each user's workplace.
My IDoc contains 1 segment E1EDK14 for sales org (QUALF = 008), for distribution channel (QUALF = 007) and for division (QUALF = 006).
What am I missing?
Note: We are not using CRM.
Thank you,

Availability Check during Production Order (controlling side) change

Dear Gurus,
we run our COMAC run over all production order, but due the fact some controlling user is performing at the same time some settlement activity the job scheduled goes in DUMP and block all the chain of ATP scheduled for all Work Center, instead of provide an easy message log that advice the order processed bt the user has not taken into account?
there is something that is wrongly set up?
Regards.
Gianluca

Dear,
It depends on when your background job started..if the background job is started before CO settlement, then system will give error in settlement. If the ATP checking background job has started after CO people started settlement, then you will have this problem.
Hence to resolve the problem two possible solutions.
1. You send a message through basis that Production order job will be starting from this time to this time and hence dodnot run settlement...hence system will give the message to all users.
2. Schedule the activity in the night when no one uses the system.
Pl come back if required.

PM Order control

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for