RadioButton Checking Issue

I have 7 radio buttons on my form and when I click to check one of the first three, it takes two clicks to do so, and the others flash for a split second. Is this a glitch? The other 4 won't even let me check them. Clicking a bunch of times just results
in an unchecked radio button.
They aren't in any group boxes, and there aren't any timers on the form.
How can I fix this?
Bgeo99

Hi Bgeo99,
As image there 3 types of controls label1, groupbox1, 7 radiobuttons in gpbox
Public Class Form3
    Private Sub Form3_Load(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles MyBase.Load
        For Each rb As RadioButton In Me.GroupBox1.Controls.OfType(Of RadioButton)()
            AddHandler rb.CheckedChanged, AddressOf RadioButton_CheckedChanged
        Next
        Me.RadioButton1.Checked = True
    End Sub
    Private Sub RadioButton_CheckedChanged(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs)
        Dim rb As RadioButton = CType(sender, RadioButton)
        Me.Label1.Text = "BackColor is : " & rb.Text
        Me.Label1.BackColor = ColorTranslator.FromHtml(rb.Text)
    End Sub
End Class
thanks.
[email protected] Pl. Mark/Proposed as Answer if found your solution Vote as Helpful if related to your topic. Always Motivate others by performing this Action.

Similar Messages

  • Cross company payment through F-53, error in Check deposit & check issue tr

    Hi
    I have just joined the community and ready with 3 queries.
    Please.......... help me to resolve.
    i) While executing the cross company payment ( company code 1300 making payment for vendor in company code 0013) using transaction code F-53, I am getting error 'vendor not defined in company code 1300'.
    For F-53 screen, vendor is selected from company code 0013.
    I have executed APP (F110) successfully in company code 1300 for paying the same vendor in company code 0013.
    ii) For check deposit transaction, error is " entry 1300 is missing in table TO43S'. (1300 is a company code)
    iii) For check issue transaction, error is "no batch input data for screen SAPMF05A'
    Thanks
    Rekha

    1. Don't give vendor number in the main screen, give all remaining inouts and press enter, then it'll show the second screen
    there you can give the company code and vendor account.
    2.  Cretae a tolerance group for GL accounts in OBA0.
    Don't post more than one query in the same thread.
    Rgds
    Murali. N

  • Open Item Management for Check Issue / Check Deposit Accounts??

    Dear Members,
    Can we define Check Issue and Check Deposit Accounts as Open Item Management Accounts??
    Pls Suggest me.
    Thank U.

    hi,
    check issue and check deposir g/l accounts select a open item management.
    because ur payment as clear or not
    how will u see the payment clear ?
    so , these accounts select open item management
    Accounts that are managed on an open item basis include:
    Clearing accounts:
    Bank clearing account
    Payroll clearing account
    Cash discount clearing account
    GR/IR clearing account
    Accounts that are not managed on an open item basis:
    Bank accounts
    Tax accounts
    Raw material accounts
    Reconciliation accounts
    These are managed implicitly using the subledger open item function
    Use
    Items posted to accounts managed on an open item basis are marked as open or cleared. The balance of these accounts is always equal to the balance of the open items.
    regards,
    janakiram

  • Report for Checks Issued

    Hi
    Can somebody tell me how can i generate a REPORTS wherein it shows our CHECKS ISSUED TO SUPPLIERS as payments?
    Also would show the Invoice Number, Invoice Amount, Payment Date and Maturity Date...
    Your help is very much appreciated...
    janna

    hi octavio
    sad to say im not knowledgeable with SQLPLUS.
    I am an accountant of a certain company and im only familiar with OFIN functions.
    I tried to modify the parameters in Sysadmin>Concurrent>Program>Define, yet it wont result to my desired result..
    I really have to see the maturity date on the reports.. In R12 we have 2 date to fill in right? .. the payment date and the maturity date..
    only the payment date is visible in the report.. are there another report that will show maturity dates?
    thanks...
    janna

  • Conflict checking issues for package XYZ on zones a, b, c

    Hello.
    I'm trying to install postfix from Blastwave on a Solaris 10 U4 Sparc system with two non-global zones installed. To do that, I do:
    adm@winds02 ~ $ sudo pkg-get -i postfix
    No existing install of CSWpostfix found. Installing...
    Pre-existing local file postfix-2.2.8,REV=2006.03.13-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz matches checksum
    Keeping existing file
    Analysing special files...
    ## Verifying package <CSWpostfix> dependencies in zone <ldap-client>
    ## Verifying package <CSWpostfix> dependencies in zone <ldap-server>
    Conflict checking issues for package <CSWpostfix> on zones
    <ldap-client, ldap-server>.
    Do you want to continue with the installation of <CSWpostfix> [y,n,?] How do I find out, which issues there are supposed to be?
    Thanks,
    Alexander

    You could also try using an admin file that should answer those questions for you
    I usually use something like:
    mail=
    instance=unique
    partial=ask
    runlevel=ask
    idepend=nocheck
    rdepend=ask
    space=ask
    setuid=nocheck
    conflict=nocheck
    action=nocheck
    basedir=default

  • Conflict checking issues for package

    Trying to install SMCsubv144 on a server in the global zone. I get the following:
    root@xxxxxxx(pts/3):/tmp# pkgadd -d ./subversion-1.4.4-sol10-sparc-local
    The following packages are available:
    1 SMCsubv144 subversion
    (sparc) 1.4.4
    Select package(s) you wish to process (or 'all' to process
    all packages). (default: all) [?,??,q]:
    ## Verifying package <SMCsubv144> dependencies in zone <xxxxxx1>
    ## Verifying package <SMCsubv144> dependencies in zone <xxxxxx2>
    ## Verifying package <SMCsubv144> dependencies in zone <xxxxxx3>
    ## Verifying package <SMCsubv144> dependencies in zone <xxxxxx4>
    ## Verifying package <SMCsubv144> dependencies in zone <xxxxxx5>
    ## Verifying package <SMCsubv144> dependencies in zone <xxxxxx6>
    Conflict checking issues for package <SMCsubv144> on zones <xxxxxx1, xxxxxx2, xxxxxx3, xxxxxx4, xxxxxx5, xxxxxx6>.
    Do you want to continue with the installation of <SMCsubv144> [y,n,?] n
    Installation of <SMCsubv144> was terminated due to user request.
    When I choose y to continue, I get into a loop of the following questions:
    Do you want to continue with the installation of <SMCsubv144> [y,n,?] y
    attribute change for /usr/local/bin <package> on SMCsubv144 <zone>
    Do you want to continue with the installation of <SMCsubv144> [y,n,?] y
    attribute change for /usr/local/doc <package> on SMCsubv144 <zone>
    Do you want to continue with the installation of <SMCsubv144> [y,n,?] y
    attribute change for /usr/local/include <package> on SMCsubv144
    <zone>
    Do you want to continue with the installation of <SMCsubv144> [y,n,?] y
    attribute change for /usr/local/lib <package> on SMCsubv144 <zone>
    Do you want to continue with the installation of <SMCsubv144> [y,n,?] y
    attribute change for /usr/local/man <package> on SMCsubv144 <zone>
    Do you want to continue with the installation of <SMCsubv144> [y,n,?] y
    attribute change for /usr/local/man/man1 <package> on SMCsubv144
    <zone>
    Do you want to continue with the installation of <SMCsubv144> [y,n,?] y
    attribute change for /usr/local/man/man5 <package> on SMCsubv144
    <zone>
    Do you want to continue with the installation of <SMCsubv144> [y,n,?] y
    attribute change for /usr/local/man/man8 <package> on SMCsubv144
    <zone>
    and that goes on and on until I answer n. And never specifies which zone it's talking about...just <zone>.
    I've successfully installed the same pkg on a non-zoned server. Also tried SMCsubv143 and got the same error. So the pkg is ok, it appears a problem with the zones and/or /usr/local.
    Thanks for any info.
    mk

    You could also try using an admin file that should answer those questions for you
    I usually use something like:
    mail=
    instance=unique
    partial=ask
    runlevel=ask
    idepend=nocheck
    rdepend=ask
    space=ask
    setuid=nocheck
    conflict=nocheck
    action=nocheck
    basedir=default

  • Check issue account tax relevant field

    Friends,
    I have created a check issue account with selecting tax category * and posting without tax allowed fields in control data.  while posting F-48 if i am trying to give check issue account in bank account field then system is giving error message Tax relevant accounts not defined inthis are.  Then after correcting the GL master by removing the tax category and posting without tax fields as blank then system is accepting the postings.
    What is the logic.  and exactly for which accounts we have to select tax category and posting w/o tax fields in control data in gl master.

    hi,
    so you've to populate tax code (/ no tax code) for every line-item. You can determine whether tax code is nedded or not with field SKB1-MWSKZ
    A.
    Message was edited by: Andreas Mann

  • Credit check issue in third party order

    Dear all,
    We are facing some issues related to credit management data for one of our customer. I need your valuable inputs for below mentioned queries-
    1. As a genaral question- When we releases a SO through VKM* How the system calculated the " Released Credit Value of the document".
    2- For one of the customers, the FD33 shows a Sales value X USD. As i see the split of this sales value , this X USD amounts to OPEN DELIVERIES. Both Open So and Open billing are zero. We tried to check with no. of tcodes to find out the open values but no such Open delv document is appeared.
    In VC/2, it only shows Open SO, no open deliveries are there.
    So i tried with simulation program RVKRED88, and found 5 third party Sales documents , against which some value is coming under the Open delivery value and it sums up to the value as coming in FD33.
    I have a few questions on this-
    > All the SO in output are Third party SO, against which PO has been created, ( Third party So> PR> PO> MIRO--> billing) and all are in status OPEN, so how come they are showing value in OPEN DELIVERY ?
    --> The value appearing against these third party SO is Not equal to items value/net value, it is a complete different value than appearing in SO. But in SO changes history , the same value is coming AS RELEASED CREDIT VALUE. How is it being calculated?
    For eg- for one of the Third party SO , the value coming in RVKRED88 is 29573.53 USD,
                                                                net value in So= 24,120.00 USD, Qty = 6000 PC , Credit price= 4.02 USD
                                                                Credit value of So in VBAk= 29573.53 USD
                                                               SO created , released on 08.July.2011, confirmed schedule line =08.Oct.2011
    Credit settings- Static check + Credit active Item cat and SO ,  Open So and open delv are ticked in credit settings.
    Kindly help in the analysis.
    many thanks in advance for the inputs.

    Hi Dharmendra,
    1.  When we release a sales order using VKM* transaction S066 information structure and OEIKW field is updated which increases open order value.
    2. If there is mismatch in the values of credit related fields run RVKRED77 (Re-organisation of credit in case of update errors) this will update all the credit data for a Payer customer in real time. RVKRED88 is simulation mode.
    3. Updating of values related to credit is controlled by the update group assigned to credit control area. If system is not able to update  using the assigned update group it will automatically try updating using the next update group. Below is the text of SAP Help.
    If a document cannot be processed with the update group you specify, the system determines the next possible update it can carry out. For example, you select Update group 000012 which, at delivery, reduces the open order value and increases the open delivery value. Assume that one item in the order is not relevant for delivery. In this case, the system automatically determines Update group 000018 for this item. Update group 000018 increases the open delivery value for the order item. The system uses the confirmed quantity of delivery-relevant schedule lines to update the order value
    As you know in OVA8 transaction credit control area, Risk category, credit group and currency are assigned to update group.

  • Availability check issue in SD

    Hello everyone
    I am currently having some issues during the ATP in Sales Order in SD.
    We are using Check Group 02 - A (Sales Order) with the following settings:
    Stock Overview --- *all are unchecked*
    Relenishment Lead Time -- *"Check without RLT" is checked*
    Storage Location Inspection -- unchecked
    In/Outward Movement --- the following are checked
    Inc. Purchase Orders
    Include Reservations
    Include Sales Order req.
    Include Deliveries
    Rest all is unchecked
    Now on a high level, what this does is that hard allocates the required Order Qty to the Sales Order if stock is available.
    e.g. Material XYZ has 100 EA unrestricted stock
    Order for 10 EA ... is allocated 10EA
    Now if a second order comes in for 100EA .. it will allocate only 90EA
    Now I was able to test this successfully with a newly created material in our development system.
    Later I rejected all the Orders that I had created for this material in ECC.
    Thus now MD04 for that material displayed no requirement.
    Now again when I tried placing an order for this material ... it wouldn't confirm.
    When I check the Availability Overview from the Sales Order, it shows the following details
    Material -- XYZ
    Plant -       WXYZ
    Total Display
    Receipts - 100
    Issues -- 300                        Confirmed Issues - 100
    ATP Situation
    Date, MRP elm., MRP element Data,  Rec./reqd qty , Confirmed , ***. ATP
    02/23/2011 , Stock  , BLANK , 100, BLANK , BLANK
    02/23/2011 , SimReq , Simulated Requirement , (10-) , BLANK , 0
    02/24/2011 , CusOrd , Totals record , (300 -) , 100 , 0
    02/23/2011 , SLocSt ,  LOC1 , 0 , BLANK , 0       
    02/23/2011 , SLocSt ,  LOC2 , 100 , BLANK , 100
    Note:
    I have put the dashes to allign them correctly. Also (10-) means negative 10
    Plant WXYZ has 2 locations viz. LOC1 & LOC2
    Currrently the stock of 100 EA is in LOC2.
    ALso LOC1 is responsible to issue the stock to deliveries.
    Question:
    Why would the ATP confirm 0 qty inspite of the Orders placed for it have been rejected.
    Note this material was never ever used before in Sales Orders.
    Any thoughts
    Thanks
    Vin
    Edited by: vinit parkar on Feb 23, 2011 8:38 PM
    Edited by: vinit parkar on Feb 23, 2011 8:44 PM

    Hey Shiva
    That did not fix the problem.
    I ran the program with Data Transfer checked .. but still the same issue
    Any other thoughts ?

  • ATD Check Issue in creation TLB Order Manually in Planning Book.

    Hi ,
    I am facing issue in ATD Check in TLB Interactive Planning while creating TLB Order Manually.
    Here goes scenario.
    I am creating TLB Order Manually in TLB Planning Book with below Information.
      Demand Date u2013 02.01.2012 ( Todayu2019s date ) & Qty u2013 20
    Considering Lead Time of 10 Days to supply from Plant to Depot, Delivery Date in Purchase Order is calculated as 12.01.2012
    Now I do outbound delivery for this PO in ECC. As client is not using Routes Transit Times functionalities, Planned Goods Issue Date for Outbound Delivery in ECC is calculated as Delivery Date from PO which is 12.01.2012 minus Transit Time in Route which is maintained as 0. Hence Planned Goods Issue Date in ECC is 12.01.2012.
    This is same as Requirement Date for Outbound Delivery. PGI for this delivery is yet to happen. When PGI is done then issue is resolved.
    When this Delivery goes in APO, it has requirement date as 12.01.2012 and now when I create TLB Order in Interactive Planning Book manually it allows me to create TLB Order of 20 qty extra before populating below message
    u201CThere is only an ATD quantity of XXX available for product GHECP02u201D
    In short it allows me to create 20 extra PO as Outbound Delivery is shifted to future bucketu2019s and  hence is not counted in ATD Issues.
    I am using Daily Bucket Profile in TLB Planning Book.
    If I use Monthly Bucket Profile my issue is solved but again when client is creating TLB Order , by default system picks first date of bucket which client does not want.
    Is there any way where in I can avoid this excess PO Creation. When it checks ATD Availability it should consider these outbound deliveries which are of future dates.
    Regards,
    Sameer

    Hi Sameer,
    Such kind of issues would come when  master data/transaction data in APO and R/3 are not in sync.
    You could go in for some custom development for TLB orders, but it's like opening a pandora's box as you are messing with teh standard working of system. It could create data inconsistencies between APO and R/3 and I would not really advise this. It's best to maintain all the relevant master data/transaction between APO and R/3 in sync.
    Better ask your client to maintain the relevant routes as required. Otherwise they should create PO directly in R/3 as required.
    Thanks - Pawan

  • ATP Check Issue - No business system could be determined for logical system

    Dear all
    Got an issue while executing ATP check on a planned order in product view,
    with a message: "No business system could be determined for logical system"
    CIF setting wise:
    regular business system group maintained and assigned in place,
    master data wise:
    business system group info fine in product master,
    Is there anywhere suggested to check under ATP setting:
    category, check mode, business event, check control/check instruction?
    Your kindest enlighting is appreciated,
    Thank you,
    mandy

    Dear Mandy,
    usually this error is caused by a missing customizing entry:       
    spro:                                        
    Integration with SAP Components
       Integration via APO Core Interface (CIF)
         Basic Settings for Creating the System Landscape                             
           - Maintain Business System Group
           - Assign Logical System and Queue Type :
    Please read the documentation for these two transactions and create the systems.
    You need to specifiy there all systems that are in your BSG. The documentation for the customizing of 'name logical system' in APO  says:                                                                               
    To enable the transfer of data between SAP R/3 and SAP APO, you need to name both the SAP APO system in which you are working and the SAP R/3  system to which you want to transfer data as logical systems.          
    I hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Tibor

  • Need to enter invoice and payment in the system after a manual check issued

    Client Need to enter invoice and payment in the system after a manual check is issued for some urgent transactions.
    Please suggest few ways to do this .

    Hi,
    If client can maintain a separate check book sequence for manual issue, we can configure a separate payment document with the same sequence and later record the invoice and generate payment ....
    Regards,
    Ivruksha

  • Printing checks Issue...!!!

    HI experts,
    I am using F110 to print one or several checks, but also I use F-58, somehow there are some differences when print it.
    I am using the same sapscript (check) for both transaction (F110 & F-58) and for payment advise also.
    Specific fields differences are in AMOUNTS.
    Total AMOUNT in local currency,
    Total AMOUNT in freign currency, etc.
    >>> Is this normal by using different transaction codes?
    >>> How can i know de difference between REGUH and REGUD ? and the differences (technically) between F110 and F-58 ?
    Thanks in advance.!!!
    Luis
    Edited by: Luis Felipe Corona on Aug 19, 2009 8:48 AM

    Me too.
    I've been using an alternate printer for printing the checks, but I'd rather get rid of the old one. (The HP Laser Pro 200 takes up a lot of space!)
    KC, Seems like you've been waiting for an answer for a VERY long time.  I'm not going to hold my breath.
    Hey HP!  Do you ever monitor this site?!
    KC-Texas wrote:
    I just purchased an HP LaserJet Pro 200 MFP M276nw which replaces an HP Color LaserJet 2605dn.
    I've run into an issue printing checkes from Quicken when I print less than a full sheet (one or two) checks.
    With my old printer, I used the manual feed for a partial sheet.
    Since the new printer does not have a manual feed, I have to put the partial sheet in the paper tray.
    It seems one of two things happen:
    1) Sometimes the printer will print the partial page but then displays an error message which says something like "Unexpected paper size, load letter."
    It then re-prints the partial page on the next sheet of paper.
    2) Othertimes, it prints the partial page without the error message, but then feeds the next sheet of paper throught the printer.
    In either case the next page contains the next three checks, so it's either wasting checks or printing on the wrong check numbers.
    Any suggestions on how to avoid these issues would be appreciated.

  • Zero Stock Check Issue

    Bins are getting blocked for putaway due to Zero Stock Check.
    We have configured the system to do zero stock check. However, this blocks the bin for stock placement & removal till the TO is confirmed.
    There could be a significant time lag between the TO creation and confirmation.
    While the Bin is blocked for putaway , the receiving dock cannot putaway goods to the bin.
    This is creating issues with the inventory movements around the WH.
    Any ideas ?

    Hi,
    In your storage type customization, the option 'Block upon stock plcmt' would have been set to 1, which blocks entire bin against goods movements. try set it to 2, it should work.

  • Credit check issue

    Dear Gurus,
    Greetings.
    We are successfully running Credit management in our Client's place. Today, for a couple of customers at one Location, there was no Credit check. Though the Customer had some Debit balance, system allowed the end user to create Sales Order, Delivery doc., and Billing without any Warning / Error message. Kindly remember Credit Management is already running for some time now at their place.
    Now for one customer we tried to raise another sales cycle to just check and it was blocking as usual !!
    Now they have raised an issue expecting an Audit objection. I have checked and everything is OK. What else can I do to find out why this happened and what can I do to stop this from happening in future.
    Your early help is very much desired.
    Thanks and regards.
    Venkat - Hyd

    It was very informative, but since the transaction has been completed I am not having any open document values for Info structure to be updated (except ofcourse Open Items, which is not dealt in this report).
    Kindly remember this transaction has been completed, where my problem is the Credit check did not seems to have been carried out and I am trying to do a Postmortem job to find out why the mandatory Credit check did not take place, which should have blocked this transaction at Delivery level itself.
    In the normal procedure, all Delivery documents will be saved and will get a Delivery Credit Block and they will be released by our Core user, who has raised the issue saying the end user was able to complete the entire cycle with out going through him to release the Credit block and ofcourse the end user does not have authorization to release a Credit block.
    So what else can I do now??
    Regards

Maybe you are looking for

  • ITunes Match Step 3 Stuck on Last Song

    i just signed up for iTunes Match and already experienced a bug ... Going trough installation I am stuck in Step 2 on the last song... I read on other forums that people restarted computers, stopped-restarted the installation yet after having tried e

  • TS1424 iTunes iBook and App Store menu show up in French.  How do I get it back to English?

    Today menus on iTunes iBook and App Store are in French.  Need to change back to English, but how?

  • Two different printers won't print cyan

    An eMac running 10.4.4 will not print cyan ink under any circumstances. This is true with both a new Canon and an older HP inkjet printer, each with its own cable and each plugged into a different USB port. An OS archive and install (involving a retu

  • 2.2 Upgrade Causes Buzzing

    You know when your phone is close to a speaker, alarm clock, etc. and you hear that buzz noise just before you receive a call and your phone rings. Well ... the 2.2 upgrade has caused my phone to do that same thing through my headphones (comes throug

  • To be Converted Checkbox

    Hello Experts While creating reference values for Reference table, the checkbox "To be Converted" Appears.Request to please explain the use of this throughout BOFC. Thanks