Reset inspection plan after results recording

Dear all,
i had one problem to be cleared, if u can please solve it.
My problem is i have assigned wrong inspection plan for one insp. lot, and i have recorded results and saved. My question is there any provision that i can reset the other inspection plan for that particular lot and record resullts again.

Hi Vijay,
Goto QA11/QA12 Change Udage Decision enter the inspection lot number and select Usage Decision -->Functions -->Cancel Lot.
Then cancel the Material Document by which the Inspection lot was created.
Then make the GR and new lot will be generated. Then assign the Inspection Plan, Results Recording.
Thanks and regards
Murugesan

Similar Messages

  • In-process inspection- operation wise result recording sequence

    Hello Everyone,
    I have just come across a requirement and would be grateful if someone can help me out in this regard.
    1.     This is make to stock discrete manufacturing scenario.
    2.     Inspection type 03 has been activated in material master.
    3.     The setting in OPK4 are, error if no inspection results exist and error when operation sequence is not adhered to.
    4.     As a result of which I cannot confirm the operation in CO11N unless result recording is done for corresponding operation.
    The requirement,
    1.     User should not be able to carry out result recording for operation 30 unless at least 1 quantity of operation 20 (preceding operation) is confirmed. Likewise it should behave for rest of the operations.
    2.     Practically material is processed for operation 30 only if 20 is confirmed. Therefore operation 30 should be inspected after 20. System allows to input result recording for all the operations irrespective its confirmations.
    Is there any standard solution for this or should I go for any exit?
    Thank you,
    Anand Rao

    Hi Sujit,
    Thanks for so prompt response.
    I am using inspection point 100. Still it is not restricting. The operation confirmation is done through CO11N and not feasible for users to perform it through QM module.
    The logic is, if I try to carry out result recording for operation 30 , system should firstly check whether any confirmation number exists or (at least 1 quantity is confirmed)for previous operation i.e. 20. If not it must stop doing RR for 30 operation.
    Whether exits QEEM0011 and QEEM0015 can restrict this, as by their description I think these work after entering RR. Here it is required before RR. Any guesses?
    Thank you again for your kind reply.
    Regards,
    Anand
    An addition,
    Even though QEEM0011 works before valuation user is able to enter RR. The requirement is user should not enter the any RR irrespecive of valuation. If user enters RR and do not valuate it this exit may not work and eventually can allow to confirm OP30.
    Edited by: Anand Rao on Aug 24, 2011 1:21 PM

  • Requirement of displaying inspection method in result recording

    Dear All,
    My clients requirement is to have the inspection method code in the result recording screen. I have the option of inspection method short text in the result recording screen. But i want a code should appear so that user can see the same for his convinient reference.
    Regards,
    Anil

    Dear Anil,
    You can create attachment in word of whatever data you want to maintain for inspection method. you can also save drawings in this attachment. assign this attachment to inspection method .You can assign attachment by
    Service for Object=> Create=>Create Attachment
    Now this attachment u can view while doing result recording & parallaly u can record results. Hope this will help you.
    Regards
    Amit

  • QM-  After Result Recording

    Helo Gurus,
    I done result recording as rejected for perticuler operation , then also the operation is going to confirm in co11n, actually it should not confirm know.
    What is actual process for that in QM? After rejection logically the operation should again done by the production deparment, that means....., please guide me, & provide the steps for the same.
    Thanks

    Dear Samir,
    Keerthi is absolutely right. These scenarios has to be mapped with rework process. in standard QM there are no much control available please find some of the options you can do
    1) Once you find that the material is rejected either you can say in the pop up screen for confirmation that is no confirmation, or make use of the rework process. You will have to use user exits to have a better control on the rework process.
    2) Make your setting in such a way that only after production person confirms the rework order then only rejected material should be allowed to confirm in the next operation.
    3) You can make use of this user exit to deal with all kind of controls in CONFPP05
    Regards
    Gajesh

  • After Results Recording - Valid Samples = 2, Defects are doubled

    I carried out results recording - there were 13 characteristics and 7 of them failed.  In the Record Usage Decision screen 14 Defects are shown (instead of 7) and under the Characteristics tab, it shows 2 valid samples for each characteristics.
    The result is that these increased defects are causing some confusion and 2 duplicate notifications are being created when the usage decision is made and the lot is saved.  Can anyone help explain why this is happening, and how I can make it stop doubling?

    Please see below SAP explanation.
    Note: The defect record is generated as a result of a valuation rule. This rule determines whether a defect record is to be created and if so, which code is to be used for the record. Since the valuation rules are stored as function modules in Customizing, you can adapt the way defect records are generated and their contents without having to make a program change.
    Example: If you record results for samples, inspection points, etc., the system creates a defect record with the assignment inspection lot/operation/inspection characteristic, each time an inspection characteristic is refected. In addition, the standard system creates an additional defect record for the inspection lot/operation/sample (or inspection point, physical sample, equipment). This is, however, not always advisable. You can use the SapNet - R/3 Frontend note 107223/1998 to ensure that this additional defect record is not created. You achieve this by storing your own valuation module (or by changing an existing one) in Customizing.
    I hope the above explains why you got 14 defect records for 7 rejections.
    Hope it helps.
    Thanks,
    Ram

  • Inprocess Inspection & result recording

    Hi all,
    We are implementing QM.
    The requirement of client is to carry out inprocess inspection(preferable without inspection plan) including result recording & defect recording & that to with quiet ease.
    Help me with the basic settings.
    Also to have the relevant report to analyse the inspection activities.
    We are using developed T code for operation confirmation, in the back end it is co11n only. So also elaborate the consequences of the same if any.
    Mangesh

    Ramanuj/ Murali,
    Thanks for your reply.
    Let me explain the process in details.
    We are having around 10 operations.
    We need to carry out inprocess inspection for 8 operation starting from 3rd operation.
    The inspection to be carried out is like length- 5 cms, shape- ok or not ok, if not ok then what is the defect, assay- 90%, if below 90% then defective like this.
    I have assigned inspection type 03 in QM view in the material master.
    Inspection lot is also getting created.
    I am stuck up at result recording & defect recording.
    So kindly guide me how to map this in details.
    Efforts would be appreciated.
    SmanS

  • Result recording to be done after UD with long term inspection

    Dear All
    I have activated two MIC's for long term inspection. Inspection lot is created and UD is provided after Result recording. i have run QA12 and go to EDIT/RESET/INSPECTION COMPLETION.  status of UD changed to LTIN and then in Qe51 / qe51n i selected long term inspection but error message is coming '' NO CHARACTERISTICS WERE FOUND". Plz help , how to do result recording after UD.

    Dear Even if the char is long terms & if you have forcefully completed the chars then even if char has LTIN status it will not allow you.
    But check this in your sandbox and revert.
    1. In the MIC set the 'Optional Characteristic' and 'Long tem inspection ' in the control indiactors.
    2. Attach MIC in inspection Plan
    3. Do results recording and comlpete UD. all short term charactericts are closed.
    4. QA12Change UD with history for Inspection Lot ,
    Menu-> Reset inspection completion -> Status changes to LTIN
    5. Goto QA02 --> you woudl see " do you wnat to compete Long term inspections" --> yes
    6. Then Long term inspection characterictic is open for results recording.
    7. Change and complete results --> Make UD
    Check and Revert.
    Cheers
    KK

  • Decimal places display at the time of results recording

    Dear All,
    Please i faced one problem, At the time of results recoridngi/.e,
    In my insp. plan i defined Quantitative specification as 70.0 with '1' decimal place in Qunatitative data. but after results recording it displaying one more decimal place excessi.e., as 70.00. How can i solve this problem, due to what this problem is occure. Please if any, solve its urgent.
    Regards,
    Vijaya

    Dear Vijaya,
    While entering Inspection Characteristics.. There is a field called DecPlaces on the right. its the  24th field on the item table.
    The field comes after
    Method, Insp Method plant, Version, Sampling Procedure, Sample Unit of Measure, Base Sample Quantity, SPC Criterion, Modification Rule, Test Eqpmt, Test Equip Short Text, Par Sample, DecPlace, Unit of Measure, Target Value, Lower spec Lmt, Upper Spec Lmt... and so on...
    Regards
    Vijay

  • QM Material specification with inspection plan

    Hello,
    I'm trying to setup QM material spec with inspection plan and it doesn't work.
    I setup material master (With insp plant and with material spec).
    I Created a characteristic that I used in my inspection plan and maintained the characteristic in the material specification.
    When I create an inspection lot (89), the characteristic is always inserted at the end instead of redefining my specifications into the pre-defined characteristic.
    Have I missed something?
    Ghislain

    As per our business scenario for Pharmaceutical we use Inspection with attached MIC with Sampling and Sample drawing Procedure, Sampling scheme to check the Quality of RM/PM/FP, can u give me some idea regarding;
    1) Material Specificaton in Inspection plan
    2) Reference Operation set with its use.
    3) Dynamic Modification Rule
    As for pharma we do;
    1) Create MIC
    2) Create Inspection plan
    3) Attaching the MIC to an Inspection plan with sampling and sample drawing procedure
    4) Attacing an Inspection Plan to an Inspection Lot
    5) Result Recording and Usage Decision of Inspection lot for
    In Automotive and othe Process Industry how the Dynamic modification rule,reference operation set, material specification flow.
    Reply will be rewarded
    Thanks in advance its urgernt

  • Usage decision vs result recording.

    Hi All Guru,
    I am new in QM , was MM & PP support. I am confused here about the usage decision vs result recording.
    I do understand in QM there's inspection lot , in order to release the inspection lot , i should released the UD.
    So what's the different between this both ?
    Can i have inspection lot without result recording ?
    Or can i have inspection lot without UD ?
    Please help to clarify my confuse.
    Thank you

    Hi Crag ,
    Thanks for understand because i am totally new in QM.
    I won't use QM for Notification here. I will use QM for stock transfer & QM in Delivery before PGI.
    As i know the basic requirement of QM 
    Setup the Master Data (QM View & all QM relavant data) ---> Type of inspection (which will determine which type of inspection to carry out ) -----> Inspection Lot Configuration --->Configuration for UD ----> Configuration for COA.
    Master data that which required
    Material master QM view,
    Master inspection characteristics,
    Task lists or inspection plans
    Code, Code groups and Selected sets.
    Quality info-record
    My Question :
    By having the above setup and configuration , without result recording can i have the COA to print out for either Post Process Inspection (Final FG) or Inspection at Delivery ?
    With the Master Data which i mention as above , is it sufficient for me to activate
    Post Process Inspection (Final FG - QM PP)
    QM Inspection at Delivery (QM /SD)
    QM stock transfer with inspection type 08.
    Hope to hear from you.
    Thank you

  • QP01 Inspection Plans

    Hi,
    I am trying to upload inspection plan master data in QP01 tcode.
    I was given a program in BDC which does the same. but the problem with this program is that....its not updating inspection characteristics after 13th record. line is not getting incremented. Below is my code .plz help
    page_count is initialized to zero.
    IF WRK-NUMB_LOOP > 1.
            PERFORM F_DYNPRO USING:
                                 ' '     TRQPAS_SEL_FLG  ' '.
         ENDIF.
    (This below part is branced out when 13 records are processed....otherwise it skips this and does the normal process)
         IF WRK-NUMB_LOOP > 13.
             PAGE_COUNT = INCR + ( WRK-NUMB_LOOP * 10 ).              
             INCR = PAGE_COUNT.                                        
            MOVE 2 TO WRK-NUMB_LOOP.
            PERFORM F_DYNPRO USING:
                                 'X'    'SAPLQPAA'    '0150',
                                  ' '    'RQPAS-AB_MKNR' INCR,
                                 'X'    'SAPLQPAA'    '0150'.
         ENDIF.
         TRQPAS_SEL_FLG+14(2) = WRK-NUMB_LOOP.
         TPLMKB_VERWMERKM+16(2) = WRK-NUMB_LOOP.
         TRQPAS_QUANTITAT+16(2) = WRK-NUMB_LOOP.
         TRQPAS_QUALITAT+15(2) = WRK-NUMB_LOOP.
         PERFORM F_DYNPRO USING:
                 ' '     TRQPAS_SEL_FLG  'X',
                 ' '    TPLMKB_VERWMERKM   INTQPMK-MKMNR.
    (few more performs are here)(when branced out for 13 records...its not performing the below dynpro performs..)
    IF PAGE_COUNT > 0.
            SUBTRACT 1 FROM WRK-NUMB_LOOP.            "TLDD
            TRQPAS_SEL_FLG+14(2) = WRK-NUMB_LOOP.
         ENDIF.
         CLEAR PAGE_COUNT.  
    wrk-numb_loop increments after one record is completely processed.
    After getting to 13th line my program is not reading the perform dynpro.....code ...
    any help is appreciated.

    There is no such direct mapping table, cross-table or Function module that describes how the Qualitative/Quantative fields are populated.
    SAP follows certain mapping to populate the values for these fields this can be cheked in SCN for Qualitative and Quantitative control indicators mapping.
    Secondly to update these indicators in Inspection plan load, you can use the STEUERKZ field value from QPMK table.
    This field is concatenation of the 28 control indicators (QMKST structure for Quali/Quantitative fields).
    So while uploading the data for Inspection plan, Inspection chracteristics are updated in system first where STEUERKZ can be updated.
    Vice versa to know what each indicator value signifies in
    the field QPMK-STEUERKZ, we can use the function module QSS0_QMKST_RQMST.
    Regards,
    Nidhi

  • Preventing UD without results recording

    HI,
    We are able to do force closing of the inspection lots without results recording by registering the UD directly. How to prevent this? i.e. we dont want to register UD for lots without result recording for all the characterisitics. With User status we cannot achieve this because if we register results for some characteristics also the system status will be updated.
    Regards,
    Ravi Kumar C.

    hi
    yes as Mr.Shyamal mentioned, you can get through User status and in MIC slect the Required Characteristic radio button on control indicators,
    If you set this indicator, the inspection characteristic must be inspected.
    This means that you can only make a usage decision for the inspection lot after you have confirmed inspection results for this inspection characteristic.
    -pl check
    -ashok

  • Inspection plan for Pipelines?

    Dear SAPIENTS,
    Business scenario: Various pipelines located in plan and need regular inspection depending upon requirement. It can be 3 MOnth, 6 MOnth or anything. Inspection lot and result recording required.
    Doubt: How can i link pipelines in system and how can i create inspection plan for them?
    Regards,

    Dear,
    If i create as a equipment than where should i enter about its functional location and installation details.
    i.e the reason i am asking if create an object link for the pipeline between two equipment or functional location than how can i create lot, notification for this link?
    Regards,

  • Automatic Results Recording for Inspection Plan

    I'm trying to activate automatic results recording, at the beginning I get this meassage: "In customizing for default value of inspection type(400) you have to activate the following check boxes, " check characteristics", "Inspection with task list" & "Automatic assignment", I've done that. Yet, it sill doesn't work and the lot status is "CRTD" however it should be updated to "REL" status.

    Hi,
    Did you search enough before posting this query? There is plenty of discussions over this matter.
    Based on the details given above, I don't think you have created an inspection plan.
    Automatic assignment will assign the task list automatically to the inspection lot once it is created. You didn't mention if you have created one or not. Pl check that.
    If the inspection plan is created, there could be possibility that material is assigned to more than one task list (inspection plan). If that is the case, you wouldn't get inspection lots with REL status but CRTD only.
    ntn

  • Changing result Recorded after UD and Insp Stock posted.

    Hi,
    Is it possible to revoke or change the result recorded after UD is given and also stock posted for material.
    In inspection plan i have activated the  long term inspection check box for that particular MIC for which i want to change the results.
    I have done UD reversal, stock reversal etc.
    Then
    I hv tried through QE02 but its showing:
    Short term Inspection Completed.
    All Insp.Completed.
    UD has been Made.
    pls suggest the possible solution on this.
    Rgds,
    Yogesh

    Dear sujit,
    We have Ztcode developed for Stock posting reversal not for UD reversal.
    Just want to know inspite of checking box for Long term planning in MIC also in Inspection plan.
    Is there any provision for reentering results for already closed MICs.
    User has made wong input entry while recording results.
    Rgds,
    Yogesh

Maybe you are looking for