[Sale Based Rent] RESRSE- Settlement step Processing of SBR not successful

Hi everyone,
While processing Sale Based Rent Contract by RESRSE,
I got some errors as below ( I'm using Cod Type: Sale Based Rent of System)
Step Posting of Sale Base Rent in Financial Accouting perform on 21.12.2011 at 11:14:4
Message for Receiving Posting
LO REC 4000/HAS 01/50, period 01.02.2011- 28.02.2011, settlement step Processing Sal
LO REC 4000/HAS 01/50, period 01.03.2011- 31.03.2011, settlement step Processing Sal
Message for General Cashflow Records
LO REC 4000/HAS 01/50, period 01.02.2011- 28.02.2011, settlement step Processing Sal
LO REC 4000/HAS 01/50, period 01.03.2011- 31.03.2011, settlement step Processing Sal
Message for Object Transfer
LO REC 4000/HAS 01/50, period 01.02.2011- 28.02.2011, settlement step Processing Sal
LO REC 4000/HAS 01/50, period 01.03.2011- 31.03.2011, settlement step Processing Sal
Message for Transfer of Advance Payment
LO REC 4000/HAS 01/50, period 01.02.2011- 28.02.2011, settlement step Processing Sal
LO REC 4000/HAS 01/50, period 01.03.2011- 31.03.2011, settlement step Processing Sal
I thought I was missing somethings. Please advise!
Regards,
TienLQ

Hi Li,
It is very difficult to find out what went wrong basing on message number, that to message class RECAPR is common message class and it will be used everywhere in RE process (settlement, periodic postings ......)
if you provide some more details, somebody can help you.
I think all your error message relates to same issue, provide error log details for any single step.
rgds,
Srini

Similar Messages

Sale Based Rent- You are not allowed to change sales-based rents

Hi everybody,
While processing a sale based rent using T-code : RESRSE, I got the problem as below:
At the Log Display Screen:
Step Processing of Sales-Based Rents performed on 19.12.2011 at 17:00:02
Status of step: You are not allowed to change sales-based rents.
Runtime for step: 00:00:00.
Does anyone experience this issue? Please give me a hint to solve it?
Thank you very much.
Regards,
TienLQ.

Hi Franz,
"I guess that the parameter 'Change Direct.' in the details is set that a change is allowed." You're totally right.
I missed it. After I did the changes for this, the process for Sale Based Rent is good but I couldn't posting the result.
I saw that EhP4 has introduced a new feature whereby we can post sales based settlemnet using periodic posting feature. For this, a checkbox is introduced in the system which we have to check in the contract and is named as 'Post using periodic posting'. I dont see this indicator in my system even though I am on Ehp5.
Could you please advise?
Regards,
TienLQ

P.O.S system integrating with Sales Based rent

Hello Gurus
Is it possible to integrate sales based rent with a P.O.S ( Point of Sale) system from the client side, ie customer, if so how?
I very much await your response.
Much Regards
David

Hi,
Yes, the solution depends on communication protocol which you want to use.
Option1: SAP receives the data through IDOC from EPOS and pass these values to BAPI BAPI_RE_SALES_REP_REPORT
Option2: In case if you are using any middle-ware, middle-ware receives the data from EPOS and tell your middle-ware consultant to consume BAPI BAPI_RE_SALES_REP_REPORT in middle-ware. You can use .Net connector / Java connector in middle-ware to consume SAP BAPI's directly.
rgds,
Srini

Minimum Gurantee and Sales based rent conditions

Hi RE-FX experts,
We have a scenario wherein from a given physical rental object, we sell two
different categories of Products. We have seperate Minimum Guranteed
Rent conditions for the two and different Sales Based rent %age share.
In RE-FX Contract, we can not assign same condition type (Minimum
Guranteed rent/Sales Based rent) twice to the same rental object for
the same period.
Kindly suggest if this can be handled through RE-FX.
Pankaj Wadhwa

Hi Experts,
I have a business case wherein One Rental Object has been leased out to a Customer and the Customer is selling two categories of products from the Rental Object. This is a Sales relevant contract.
The Customer is paying different Minimum Guranteed rent for the two Product categories (e.g. Product category A: Minimum Guranteed Rent: 10000 and Product category B: Minimum guranteed rent: 25000).
The Customer has different revenue share for both the Product categories viz Revenue share % for Product category A: 20% and Revenue share %age for Product Category B: 30%.
How can we make a RE Contract like this in the system..
I am trying to create such a contract wherein i have created two reporting rules for the two Product categories and Sales rules as well with the relevant revenue share %age. I am trying to enter Minimum Guranteed rent Condition in the Contract for both the Product Categories seperately since the values are different(10000 & 25000) and the revenue share %age are also different.
But since the conditions are assigned to the Rental Object and as per the design of SAP RE-FX, we can not assign the same condition(Minimum Guranteed Rent here) to same Rental Object for the same period, i am getting stuck.
Can anyone help me on this problem.
Thanx in advance,
Pankaj Wadhwa

Wrongly posted Sales Based Rent

Hello,
I have posted a SBR with Sales volume Zero. Now, we realised that there is a sales value for that period. Can you please advise how to correct it.
Should i input the new volume in RESRRP and run RESRSE again or should i reverse the old SBR and input the new sales volume and post it again.
Kindly advise.
Regards
Saravanan.A

Hi Saravanan
What you guessed is right. You need to update the sales (whether with RESRRP or manually within contract) which will result in new versions. But then, instead of RESRSE run RESRSECORRECT (Correction of Sales-Based Settlement) if reversing cannot be made.
Regards, Sekhar

RE : Sales based rent agreement- additional reporting rules

Dear Friends
I have created a contract with relevant to Sales tab flaged.
The starting date of the contract is the middle of the month and the agreement with the Business partner is to make sales based settlement on an monthly basis i.e in days as the contract start date is in the middle of the month and on monthly for rest of the period. In fast entry for new sales rules, we specified the frequency start date and frequency in months and also gave settlement frequency in the same way and then attach condition types to the sales rules.
Since the frequency is reporting rules is given in months, and the system caculates the report for 30 days extending to the next month also.
For your easy understanding I have explained the issue with an example:
Contract Start Date 23.03.2008
Contract end date 22.03.2010
Reporting rule frequency 1 month and start date 23.03.2008
Settlment frequency 1 month and start date 23.03.2008
The settings in Frequency start to "Start of Calender year" in Posting parameter has no effect on reporting rules.
Now I need to run the sales based report as per the following
From 23.03.2008 to 31.3.2008 i. e for 9 Days and after that
every month i. e from 01.04.2008 to 30.4.2008,01.05.2008 to 31.05.2008 and so on
I request you to kindly help me as to how I can overcome this issue
Thanks & Regards
Panda

The issue was relating to both
1) the grading which must have a highest level defined as from X to $0.
2) The condition for the sales rule must have a valid from date. If not, the error displayed is "No sales rule specified" but its actually the related condition that is failing.

Sales Based Contract : Error : Selec a valid settlement

Hi,
Iam new to the RE Module.
Whil doing the TCODE : RESRSE, iam getting the message as 'Select a valid settlement'.
Contract details are as follows:
Condition type is selected only one that is the Sales based and it is statistical.
Sales quantities has been updated.
Sales amount given in the "Sales Rule" - Calculation.
I've given the validity dates, posting date, settlement date correctly.
My question is : Here, is actual condition type (like any rent) are necessary to get calculate and settle the sales ?
If the actual condition type is not necessary then what would be necessary things to be updated ?
Please reply with your inputs.
VVR

Hello
Pls check the below:
1. Before RESRSE, the respective sales figures should be available in the Contract or if no sales available Tick Zero Sales upto the period for which the sales settlement you would like to do.
2. In RESRSE, in addition to default fields like Co Code, Contract No, etc select Settlement Method Simulate, Settlement Type as Standard, Settlement schema as Using Actual AP, Settlement step as 05 Simulation of Posting Costs.
3. In Selection of Sales Rule tab, give Settle Upto Date.
4. In Parameters tab, give Text, Posting & Doc Date, Posting Period, Baseline Date as per the requirement.
Now execute and see. If successful remove simulate and select execute in Settlement Type.
Regards
Amarnath.R

Settlement of Process order aginst the Sale Order

Dear friends
This the scenario with respect to product cost by sale order settlement profile. When I am settling the process order, which is created with reference to Sale order, system throwing an error "Define a settlement cost element for receiver type SDI".
When I see the explanation given by system, the following message displayed :
"Diagnosis
In allocation structure Z1 (controlling area RI01), you did not define which cost element should be used when settling costs/revenues of the sender. Nor did you define receiver type SDI.
Procedure
Assign a different allocation structure to the settlement sender (-> Master data -> Settlement rule -> Goto -> Settlement parameters), or maintain allocation structure Z1.""
For this I have defined one Secondary cost element and assigned to Allocation Structure under Settlement cost elements.
Still I am getting the error. What could be the reason?
Please do the needful.

Hi Kiran
In the Allocation Structure Z1, you need to define the Settlement cost element for the receiver category SDI. Have you done that? Cost element should be created with 21 Cost element category.
Dont Select By Cost element.
Regards,
Suraj

MDM Data Manager step-by-step process with an example

Hi All,
I recently started reading MDM. I am clear with MDM-Console concepts. But I have problem with MDM Data Manager. I am confused with data entries in qualified tables, work flows(using microsoft studio), Matching mode- rules(High treshold, low threshold) etc.. I read material posted in forums- but still I am not clear.
I need a step-by-step process for data entries with *examples*. A good example which covers all Data Manager concepts. PDF's with screen shots, videos any thing would help.
Please help me......It would be of great help.
Thanks in Advance.
Suchir

Hi Suchir ,
MDM 5.5 has 4 MDM clients to perform 4 main functionality on the MDM master records.
- Console- This is where all the Administrative work is performed
- Data Manager- This is where the actual maintainence work is done on the master data like consolidation deduplication etc.
- Import manager- Thsi is from where the source matser records are taken into MDM repoistory
- Syndicator- This is from where teh consolidated master data is send back to the target systems.
MDM Data Manager is the heart of MDM
The activities that can be performed in the MDM Data manager are:
- Data Consolidation
- Data Validation
- Data Deduplication
- Data Assignment
- Data Governanace
etc......
Qualified Table:
- Qulaified tables are used to store relational records where one field value is determining the other field or fields value.
- Qualified tables are maintained in Console and can be viewed in Data Manager
- Qualified Table are viewed under a separate section in Data Manager in the right hand side.
- Qualified table has Non qualifiers and Qualifiers.
- Non qualifiers can be seen in the Qualified table and in the linking Qualified field
- Qualifiers can be seen separately under the Qualified section in the data manager
Kindly refer the below link to know more on this:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/00a15239-684e-2b10-b8ae-b936b7d1c1fe
Workflows
- Workflows are designed in MDM for Governanace
- You can create the MDM workflow using the MS Visio 2003 stencils in the MDM Data manager in the record mode under the workflow table
- The saved workflow in DM can then be executed either mnaully or automatically based on teh trigger actions
- The trigger action for teh MDM wf are record Add,Update,Import,Manual
Kindly refer the below link to know more on this:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/60559952-ff62-2910-49a5-b4fb8e94f167 (MDM Workflows Overview)
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/90990743-91c0-2a10-fd8f-fad371c7ee40 (Demo of MDM Workflows)
Matching Mode
- This mode is exclusively for Master data deduplication
- We need to create Rules,Strategies,Transformation in MDM data manager in teh record mode
- Then you need to run these strategies on the selected records
- Based on your score and threshold set in the strategy MDM will identify duplicate records
- This score will be seen in teh Matching mode
- Colour coding is used along with scores to find out dupliactes
- Green - 100%dupliacte Blue- 50?% Red- No duplicate
Kindly refer the below link to know more on this:
/people/michael.reil/blog/2006/05/18/mdm-matching-strategies-for-master-data-consolidation (matching merging in mdm)
Hope It Helped
Thanks & Regards
Simona Pinto

EAM ID based or Role based? Why settle for just one?

G'Day All,
I've raised a question in the following blog, however I would like to open it up to other people as well so they might get something out of it and in the process might share their own thoughts on the matter at hand.
ID-Based Firefighting vs. Role-Based Firefighting
So this is where I am at this point:
From what I can gather so far, my understanding of EAM ID/ROLE based is as follows:
- Id Based: Logs in using own U.ID and through GRAC_SPM accesess FFID from the GRC Server and logs into the system assigned to them (ECC, SRM, CRM etc)
Only one user at a time can use a FFID.
Firefighter need not exist in every system assigned to them due to central logon however they need to exist in the GRC system
Knows exactly when FFID is being used as he/she has to login so has a psychological effect (good thing)
Better tracking of FF tasks - Specific log reports with Reason Codes. Bonus point from Auditors!
Two Log ins so potential to commit fraud. (1 action using own UserID and 1 action using FFID)
Could be hard to track and find out when a fraud has been committed so can be a problem with auditors.
      ID Based -> GRAC_SPM : TCode for Centralised FFighting -> You will see FFIDs assigned to you
      ID Based -> /n/GRCPI/GRIA_EAM : TCode for DCentralised FFighting -> You can see the FFIDs assigned to you
- Role Based: Logs into the remote system only using U.ID, so everything gets logged against that one ID.
Multiple users can use the FFROLE at once.
Firefighter has to exist in every system assigned to them - so multiple logons.
Hard to differentiate between FF tasks and normal tasks as no login required So easy to slip up
Time consuming to track FF tasks - No Specific log reports. No Reason Codes
     R.Based -> GRAC_SPM : TCode for Centralised FFighting -> You will see FFROLEs
     R.Based -> /n/GRCPI/GRIA_EAM : TCode for DCentralised FFighting -> Not applicable so wont work
So based on this there are pros and cons in both however according to SAP only one can be used. To me personally, it makes more sense to get the best of both the worlds right? So here is my question why can’t we just use both?
    . Really critical tasks -> FFID
    . Normal EAM tasks -> FFRole
Alessandaro from the original post pointed this out:
"Per design it isn't possible to achieve both types of firefighting at the same time. It's a system limitation and hence to configurable."
Well this is what I can't seem to get my head around. For a FFID, there is a logon session so it has to be enabled and as far as I can tell there is no way around it.
However for FFRole, there isn't such limitations/restrictions like starting a separate session. FFRole is just assigned to an end user for him/her to perform those tasks using their own user ID.
So in what way is it different from any of their other tasks/roles, other than the fact that they've got an Owner/Controller assigned to the FFRole? and
What is stopping us from using it when ID based is the default?
If I were to do the following does it mean I can use both ?
    . Config Parameter: 4000 = 1 (GRC System) -> ID Based
    . Config Parameter: 4000 = 2 (Plug-In) - > Role Based
Please excuse me if my logic is a bit silly, Role Based firefighting is only done on Plug-in systems so the following should work just fine:
   . Config Parameter: 4000 = 2 (Plug-In) - > Role Based
However for ID based, it is a Central Logon, so the following is a must:
    . Config Parameter: 4000 = 1 (GRC System) -> ID Based
Which means both ID/Role based can be used at the same time, which seems to be working just fine on my system. Either way I leave it you experts and I hope you will shed some light on it.
Cheers
Leo..

Gretchen,
Thank you for thoughts on this.
Looks like I'm failing to articulate my thoughts properly as the conversation seems to be going in a different direction from what I am after. I'll try once more!
My query/issue is not in regards to if/what SAP needs to do about this or why there isn't more support from Companies/Organizations and not even, which one is a better option.
My query is what is stopping us(as in the end users ) from using both ID/Role based at the same time?
Now before people start referencing SAP documentation and about parameter 4000, humour me with the following scenario please. Again I would like to reiterate that I am still in the learning phase so my logic might be all wrong/misguided, so please do point out to me where I am going wrong in my thought process as I sincerely would like to know why I am the odd one out in regards to this.
Scenario
I've created the following:
FFID
FFROLE
Assigned them to, two end users
John Doe
Jane Doe
I set the Configuration Parameters as follows:
IMG-> GRC-> AC-> Maintain Configuration Settings -> 4000:1 - ID Based
IMG-> GRC (Plug-in)-> AC-> Maintain Plug-In Configuration Settings-> 4000:2 - Role Based
User1
John Doe logs into his regular backend system (ECCPROD001)-> executes GRAC_SPM-> Enters the GRC system (GRCPROD001)-> Because the parameter is set to ID based in the GRC Box, so he will be able to see the FFID assigned to him-> and will be presented with the logon screen-> Logs in -> Enters the assigned system (lets say CRMPROD001) At this point the firefighting session is under progress
User2
Jane Doe logs into her regular backend system (ECCPROD001) -> (can execute GRAC_SPM to check which FF Role has been assigned to her but she can see that in her regular menu, so there is no point) -> Executes the transactions assigned in FFROLEThis is done at the same time while FFID session is in progress
So all I want to know is if this scenario is possible? if the answer is No, then why not?
I physically carried out this scenario in my system and I had no problems(unless I am really missing the plot here), which brings me back to my original question: Why settle for just one?
Again to reiterate I am not getting into the efficacy or merits of this or even if one should use this. Just want to know if it is possible/feasible or not.
So there you have it. That's the whole enchilada(as they say there in Texas). I tried to word my thoughts as concisely as I can, if there are still any clarifications, more information you or anyone else reading this would like, please do let me know.
Regards,
Leo..

Settlement of process order

In PP-PI We want to use active ingredient for scenario:
Our Raw material is MINING ORE which will have varying proportion of COPPER & COBALT.
Valuation of ORE is based on itu2019s content of COPPER & COBALT content. So we will use active ingredient to capture value of this raw material based on it content of CU & CO.
Now when we issue this material for production to process order, our semi finished output ( Say SFG1) will also have varying content of COPPER & COBALT based on kind of input quality. There will several process orders doing diff. processe.
Now my query is
1)     Can we settle the process order variance to COPPER & COBALT content of SFG1 instead of normal settlement to SFG1?
2)     Can I maintain my valuation of SFG1 based on COPPER & COBALT content?
3)     Do we have any user exit or BADI available to replace SFG1 with CO& CU in process order settlement rule?
4)     In standard cost estimate can we capture COPPER & COBALT characteristics?
Ultimately COPPER & COBALT are our finished goods.
I try to search sap help but not much info to help me on this.
Your input will be highly appreciated.
Nitesh

Hi,
The concept explained is typically a co-product scenario:
Ore produces SEMI COPPER and SEMI COBALT. SEMI COPPER and SEMI COBALT produce FIN COPPER and FIN COBALT.
This scenario is covered under u2018CO-PROUDUCTu2019 concept. Here Ore is Raw Material, SEMI COPPER and SEMI COBALT are SEMI-PRODUCT and finally COPPER and COBALT are Finished Product.
Now estimate the standard cost for your SEMI-PRODUCTS and FINISHED PRODUCTS using integrated BOM. Sit with your PP Consultant who can give you good input for costing the products whether based on quanity yield or quality yield.
Once this is tested and found the results are expected, the solution can be freezed.
Please let me know your feed back.
Regards,
Ashok

Sales based data migration through LSMW BAPI (BUS1505) change

Hi Everyone,
keep getting this error message while trying to load sales based scenario.
there is neither no term category in the sales rules's structure nor it is in reporting rule's structure.
error message
Term category 1410 cannot be used in sales rules
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
John

John,
That is hilarious I know that feeling.
Not sure why you are getting this error but try following -
1. Make sure your file does not have data in cells which you don't use.
2. Structures which you do not want to pass any values in, do not pass those structures at all. Means if you wish to change only business partner then user only 1 structure and one header record for identifying the contract that is it. Do not pass any other structure not even blank in the file.
3. Make sure in source to target mapping you have made correct assignment if by mistake you have made incorrect assignment you will get bad data.
4. When you read your data execute step display read data and review where you see 1410.
5. Similarly when you execute Convert step in LSMW execute display converted data and you will see if 1410 was populated.
last step if none of the above works ) Display the conversion program and put a debug point at this particulat field and see from where this value is being passed. This is no standard error so it has to be your LSMW/Input file.
Let me know what it was
Jag

PM order settlement steps

Hi,
I have a basic question regarding PM order settlement. I know that for PP orders, following are the settlement steps for individual processing.
1) After final confirmation of the order (status CNF) using IW41, do GR (IW8W for refurbishment order, etc). Status will now be DLV.
2) Technically complete the order (IW32-Order-Functions-Complete-Complete (technically). Order status is now TECO.
3) Actual overhead calculation - tran KGI2
4) WIP calculation - tran KKAX
5) Variance calculation - tran KKS2
6) Actual settlement - tran KO88.
Now for PM order, please tell whether steps 4 and 5 are relevant. Do we need to calculate WIP and variance for PM order? What are the exact steps to settle a PM order?
Any help will be highly appreciated.
Thanks and regards,
Abhijit

Hi
Please refer the link [http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/b1/c04d28439a11d189410000e829fbbd/frameset.htm]
Regards,
Rakesh

Entity validation behavior in multi-step process

I'm using jdev 11g with ADF BC and I want to create a multi-step process with a train to split a long form into multiple views. The fields on the form are based on a entity object that was created from a database table. Most of the fields are mandatory. The problem is when I want to navigate from page to page the mandatory validation rules are triggered for all fields. So far, the only way to go around this is to delete all mandatory contraint from the entity object and set the fields on the form as required. Is there a way to differ the validation on the entity object when a commit is done or trigger only the rules for the fields on the current page?
Thanks.

Hi,
have a lok at the PageDef file of the pages. There is a skipValidation property that you can use to declaratively suppress validation. Try setting this property to true fro all but the last page in the process. Using this property you don't ned to change the constraints in the model
Frank

How to insert PO details in an ADF based form and initiate the process flow

Hi All,
Could any one let me know how to insert PO details in an ADF based form and initiate the process flow in oracle BPM. This ADF form will be custom one....How to create a ADF custom based form.Please let me know the step by step process..Am new to BPM
Thanks in advance,
sreevani

Hi All,
Could any one let me know how to insert PO details in an ADF based form and initiate the process flow in oracle BPM. This ADF form will be custom one....How to create a ADF custom based form.Please let me know the step by step process..Am new to BPM
Thanks in advance,
sreevani

[Sale Based Rent] RESRSE- Settlement step Processing of SBR not successful

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for