Source Inspection Partial Qty GR

Hi Experts,
In Source Inspection Scenario there is a requirement, before GR quality wants to accept partial qty.
Ex: I st case: As per PO qty 10 PCs after inspection 6 accepted and 4 rejected during GR system should allow accepted qty only.
IInd case: As per PO qty 10pcs he will inspect and accept 2 qty and system should allow only for 2 qty not for all 10 qty.
How it is possible kindly explain me
Inadvance Thanx
Shiva Patil

Hi
Its not possible to have partial Qty GR for the source inspection as there is no stock posting screen in the souce inspection.
Either you have to accpet all or reject all
Regards
Sujit

Similar Messages

  • Source inspection- partially accept

    Dear all,
    How to partially accept the source inspection lot.  For example: my source inspection lot size 10 kg I want to accept only 5 kg.
    Otherwise how to give the link to GR.(like  5 KG accepted qty)
    Thanks and Regards,
    Vairavan

    Hi Vairavan,
    Please make a note that Source inspection is non stock relevant. It has no control over the stock posting. Moreover you'll do the inspection at Vendor premises.
    Rather what you can do is accept only 5 kg out of 10 kg in the results recording screen and take UD (like accepted partially) and at the same time change the PO quantity to 5 kg, which will satify your requirement.
    Regards,
    Keerthi.

  • During Inprocess Inspection partial qty confirmation

    Hi Experts,
    There is a requirement in Inprocess Inspection (for 03) find here the detail.
    Ex: Routing Operations
          010       Machining
          020       Milling
          030       Inspection
          040       Turning
          050       Inspection
          060       End Cut
    Challenges :
    1) Without confirmation of operation 020 system should not allow for result recording.
    2) If partial qty accepted system should allow on those qty for further operation 040 confirmation.
    3) How many operations inspected, accepted qty operation wise, can we get through std
    Kindly suggest
    Thanks
    Shiva Patil

    Go here:
    SPRO > Production> Shop floor control> confirmation> define confirmation parameters
    Maintain
    1)Operation sequence u2013 error when order sequence is not adhered to
    2) Over delivery u2013 Error when over delivery tolerance is exceeded
    3) Results Rec. (QM)- Error message if no Insp results exist
    So what these setting helps is that
    1)All operation has to be confirmed operation wise means 0010 has to be confirmed for confirming 0020 operation. SO production guys can only confirm 0040 operations only after 0030 operations is confirmed by quality personal.
    2)Over delivery is not allowed means of in 0030 operation if only 50 quantity is confirmed in 0040 operation only 50 can be confirmed. Production people cannot confirm more than 50 quantities
    3) Also PP personal cannot confirm operation 0030 through C011N till the result recording of that operation is done through QA32.
    Hope this helps to start.
    Thanks!!!

  • Schedule delivery qty issue in source inspection process

    Hi,
    Issue : System is blocking GR if any one of the schedule delivery qty is rejected against same PO.
    System been used : Source inspection process.
    Issue in details:
    We create PO for 3000 kg with delivery schedule as 1000kg on 12th sept, 1000 kg on 13th sept and 1000 kg on 14th sept and save it.
    Then we go to QI07 and create three inspection lots against this PO. So during user decision if we reject any one of the inspection lot then whole PO get block for GR, system should allow to do GR of 2000kg but it is not allowing, it say material is blocked for quality.
    Kindly resolve my issue
    Regards,

    Hello,
    I doubt whether you can do this using source inspection. Now let me give you another option which will be manual in nature.
    1. Checking should happen before GR. - Make use of manual inspection(89 type)
    2.  System should restrict the GR if the material is rejected. - Do not release the quantity in quality info record if the material is rejected.
    3.System should allow GR for partial approved material and restrict GR for partial rejected material against same PO - Release the required quantity in quality info record so that the GR can be done only for those quantities. A normal 01 inspection type lot will be created.
    4. Rejected quantity material PO should get open to take GR for replacement of rejcted material of same PO - You can make use of 122 movement type in the lot so that GR can be done for the rejected quantity as well.
    Regards
    Gajesh

  • Qual Insp:Perform partial qty REJECT in QA12 for Material GR inspection lot

    Dear All,
    Please advice me for a scenarion.
    I perform MIGO-GR - MType 103 for 5 qty, material moves to GR Blkd Stk.
    Then perform MIGO-RelBlkSTk - MType 105 for 5 qty, the material moves from GRBlkStk to QualtInspStk.
    The perform QA32 for the insp lot , and ACCEPT the 5 qty to UnrestStk.
    This acceptence movement calculates the Vendor Evaluation Quality criteria also.
    I can also REJECT the above inspection lot by QA12 : Change Usage Decision, this rejects the full 5 qty, and this also has impact in vendor evaluation quality criteria rating. Then Return to the Vendor the 5 qty.
    My query is:
    Now if i want to return PARTIAL qty to the vendor ALONG WITH VENDOR RATING RETURN CALCULATION.
    I am unable to enter partial qty in the QA12, in the 'Inspection Lot tab' in the 'To Be Posted' column.
    The whole column is non-editable, is it standard by default as non-editable?
    Am i performing the right steps for my requirement?
    Thanks in advance,
    Joy Ghosh

    Hi
    In QA12, after entering appropriate Usage decision, click on "defective quantity" tab at header, and there enter the quantity.
    Umakanth R

  • Incoming inspection through source inspection

    Hello,
    I want to do incoming inspection for few raw materials on lot basis (each trucks is one lot). But quality department  do the inspection for certain characteristics and truck will allowed inside only if QA dept accepts the lot.
    Then gross weight is taken and material is unloaded in yard. Again empty truck wt is taken through weigh bridge. Then Good receipt for that lot is done based on formula GRN qty= GROSS - Tare wt.
    So I think option for me for incoming inspection is Source inspection. But quality needs data and Usage decision done to be based on lot wise. Is it possible for me to do source inspection based on lot wise for one open purchase order.
    Concluding:- I need incoming inspn before Goods Receipt for each lots I receive. I may have one PO, but my vendor may give 5 trucks on that PO. Each truck I need to maintain as a lot for inspection.
    Whats the best way...Assured rewards for best solution

    Have you tried using inspection points for this?  Each truck can be a new inspection point.  But you can't make the UD until the end of the day or the next day which could be a problem.  I think you'll have to have the material go right to unrestricted inventory, (turn off post to inspection stock in the inspection type setup for the 01.)
    As you do each receipt, the qty of the truck will increment the inspection lot posting qty as well as unrestricted inventory.  If an inspection point fails, the tech/mgr. would post that qty in the returns stock line.  This would move the qty from unrestricted back to the vendor.
    The final UD would be on the qty of all five trucks received for the day minus any that were rejected.  You may need to work with the invoicing folks as to how this all impacts the invoice.  But I beleive they'll see a shortage of material if any trucks were rejected.
    Craig

  • Inspection point qty confirmation for operation - INprocess Inspection

    Hi Experts,
    After doing partial confirmation in the Result recording, the partial confirmed qty moves down to the next operation and is confirmed. But using QM result recording when I try to post the next partial qty, the system cancels the previous confirmation although the next operation has been confirmed for the partial qty. And I am able to confirm the full qty for the operation
    How to avoid this situation ?
    Regds
    Jomy

    Dear Jomy,
    Please use 150 as the inspection point in your routing header.
    But please make sure that in configuration you have this maintained.
    SPRO>QM> Quality planning > inspection planning > general > define identifier for inspection point> select the inspection point you are using >double click> function module> maintain in Automatic creation of insp. Points > maintain this function module QAPP_CUST_IP_CREATE > tick the use function module
    Test with a  new order and lot.  Each time you go for RR it will go for new partial lots. So confirmation will get added up as in  co11n process.
    Hope this helps
    Regards
    gajesh

  • Inwarsd Inspection - Partial Acceptance

    Hi all,
    We are doing the Inwards Inspection at MIGO level with 103 movement. At UD I am accpeting only a Partial Quantity by 105 movement. Remaining is returned to Vendor by 124 movement. Both 105 and 124 happens at QA32 UD level. (Automatic).
    My client is asking for the Excise Invoice that has to be sent to Vendor so that Vendor will get the Credit for the taxes he paid for the returned qty. ( He would have paid the taxes for the complete quantity and as we have returned partial qty, they should get back the credit from Gov).
    To ensure that Vendor receives the Credit back, what are all the documents need to be sent and How?.
    Note: As I am doing Inspection at 103 level, no stock is updated with the procurement qty. So in this case, I am returning the goods as if I haven't receive them.
    Experts please guide me.
    Best Regards
    Sam

    Thnx Mr.Neeraj.
    I have few doubts in the same context. Why Account document should be generated and why Inventory should get updated before the Quality Inspection is over.
    Why the reversal of Accounting Entries and reversal of Inventory and all other reversal should takes place unnecessarily, if we could reject the materials at Quality Inspection (103) itself.
    Will this not simplify all the process that I have mentioned above.
    Regards
    Sam

  • Sample size calculation for Source Inspection

    Dear Gurus,
    I have an issue regaring sample size calculation for Source Inspection.
    I created a PO for 500 nos.
    The sampling procedure assigned in the Quality Plan is %age based (10%).
    When Inspection lot is created, system is caluating the Sample size as 500 and not 50.
    Moreover, when I go to Result Recording, the Inspection qty for the MIC is shown as 1. If the system is calculating sample size as 500, then the inspection qty for the MIC should also be 500. Moreover, the sample size should be 50 only.
    Please provide your inputs on this.
    Regards,
    Nitin

    Thanks Sujit!
    Your are correct. It works in the same way as u told.
    Assigned you the points for the answer.
    Closing the thread.
    Regards,
    Nitin

  • Partial qty MIRO and GR for import PO

    Hi,
      For import PO first we are creating PO for vendor and we enter only qty and 0%  tax for import PO  after getting material as per schedule qty we are creating new PO for the recieved qty only and we are adding all the custom condition as delivery cost in second PO then we process further like MIRO  and GR ,  but to avoid this we are trying to make only one PO on import vendor and adding all the custom codnition in that PO in development server and we process the MIRO, J1IEX, and GR process for partial qty for one material and for one material we have taken ful qty. first time it works OK  ,  now when second time we want to do MIRO , J1IEX and GR againt same PO we are facing probelm like In MIRO when we enter PO number it is showing some amount in Balance amount filed which is generally 0 ,  in MIRO it is also showing the some material for which no open qty and also for partial qty if we enter qty more than open po qty system is not giveing any error,
    Can you some stpes and tips  what configurationwe need,  actual requirement is we want that we will create import PO o etime by adding all the custom condition as delivery cost and ref. to that material we want to do MIRO, J1IEX and GR  for partial qty.
    regards,
      zafar

    Hi,
      I have two points,
    While after  recieving import material first we do the miro for custom condition in this we enter the custom vendor code in the invoicing party, and below next to PO number field we generally select option no. 3 i.e Goods / service item + planned delivery cost with this all conditions come in the miro but our requirement is only those codnition should come in which invocing party is which we have enter in the header fied of MIRO ,
      so insted of 3 option Goods / service item + planned delivery cost ,  if we select option 2 Planned delivery cost our problem get solve so i want to know what is the effect if insted of 3 option we select option 2.
    regards,
      zafar

  • Partial Qty delivery error

    Hey guys..
    I'm plagued with this problem and haven't found a solution yet so I'd thought I'd come the experts:
    We routinely ship partial qty's per delivery line to customers if they choose..
    ie- SalesOrder is for 3 widgets and we only have 1. We'll ship the 1 we have and later ship  the remaining 2.
    Our GUI-SAP has no problem with this but when I push this though the SAPbobsCom.dll, it returns the following error:
    SAPbobsCom_Call Funct- Error in SAP Post--- DocEntry:16052 didn't commit--->Quantity falls into negative inventory  [DLN1.ItemCode][line: 1]| retval: -10
    This error seems revolve around serialized stock but I'm not ruling out that our non-serialized is also a problem.. I'll test shortly.
    Regardless, here's the code
    SAPbobsCOM.Documents odeliveries = (SAPbobsCOM.Documents)Vcmp.GetBusinessObject(BoObjectTypes.oDeliveryNotes);//new SAPbobsCOM.Documents();
                        odeliveries.DocDate = DateTime.Now;
                        foreach (var CommitItem in CommitObject)
                            BaseEntry = CommitItem.RDR_DocEntry;
                            BaseNum = CommitItem.RDR_DocNum;
                            odeliveries.Lines.BaseEntry = Convert.ToInt32(CommitItem.RDR_DocEntry);
                            odeliveries.Lines.BaseType = 17;
                            odeliveries.Lines.BaseLine = Convert.ToInt32(CommitItem.RDR_LineNum);
                            odeliveries.Lines.WarehouseCode = CommitItem.RDR_WhsCode;
                            //odeliveries.Lines.Quantity = CommitItem.Qty_To_Pick;
                            //odeliveries.Lines.ItemCode = CommitItem.RDR_ItemCode;
                            if (CommitItem.Serial_Flag == "Y")
                                int SerialCount = 0;
                                foreach (var sysnum in CommitObject.FirstOrDefault(x => x.RDR_LineNum == CommitItem.RDR_LineNum).SysNum)
                                    odeliveries.Lines.SerialNumbers.Quantity = 1;
                                    odeliveries.Lines.SerialNumbers.SystemSerialNumber = Convert.ToInt32(sysnum);
                                    odeliveries.Lines.SerialNumbers.SetCurrentLine(SerialCount);
                                    odeliveries.Lines.SerialNumbers.Add();
                                    SerialCount++;
                            else
                                int CurrentLine = 0;
                                odeliveries.Lines.ItemCode = CommitItem.RDR_ItemCode;
                                foreach (var Bin_AbsNum in CommitObject.FirstOrDefault(x => x.RDR_LineNum == CommitItem.RDR_LineNum).From_Bin)
                                    odeliveries.Lines.BinAllocations.Quantity = Bin_AbsNum.Value;
                                    odeliveries.Lines.BinAllocations.BinAbsEntry = Bin_AbsNum.Key;
                                    odeliveries.Lines.BinAllocations.SetCurrentLine(CurrentLine);
                                    odeliveries.Lines.BinAllocations.Add();
                                    CurrentLine++;
                            odeliveries.Lines.Add();
    Note this code has worked for creation of over 2000 lines on 850 deliveries, So the problem seems to be isolated to partial line deliveries..
    Thanks in advance Guys!!

    Hi Steve,
    the error message is quite clear - you are trying to add an delivery line with an item which is not onhand  ( in that warehouse ).This isn't't working in SBO client either : you can't deliver something you don't have.
    btw. you always add an empty line at the end which is not needed.
    regards,
    Maik

  • Scenario with reference to source inspection and MIGO

    Hi all,
    My scenario as follows:
    1.Source Inspection lot should get generated as per the lead time given in Q-Info while creating PO.
    2.MIGO should not be allowed when source inspection lot is open(Means UD is not taken).
    3.Inspection lot should be generated while doing GR in MIGO when source inspection lot is accepted.
    These all three points are with reference to one raw material.
    Kindly throw some light on the above said scenarios.
    Thanks in advance
    Sudhar

    Dear Sudhar
    1) For generating inspection lot automaticaly please use QA51. here you can shedule the program as in Qi07 and can be sheduled in a defined frequency
    2) You may have to go for user exit if you need to stop GR when the source inspection is open. You may use MB_CF001. Please check the exact exits as there is no option in standard for the same
    3) just check - in config maintain GR for Rejection -  GR not allowed and in quality info record maintain No GR inspection for source inspection
    Please let me know the issues
    Regards
    Gajesh

  • Stock posting in block stock after grn for source inspection

    Hi All,
    I have following scenario
    I am doing source inspection at vendor site i have maintained control key 0005 in material master & necessary certificate with certificate check required at GRN & UD stage
    i am creating a source inspection lot for a release po through t.code qi07 & then processing that lot before GRN
    Now when i am doing GRN for same PO it is giving me the following message  stage
    <b>A category ZC01(user sp. category) inspected certificate is required</b>
    Message no. QA312
    Diagnosis
    An inspected certificate must exist at the first goods receipt for a purchase order item.
    Procedure
    Check whether a suitable certificate exists for the purchase order and delivery, and create a certificate record with the status "Certificate checked and stored".
    If there is no certificate or no suitable certificate, this does not comply with the requirements in the material master record. If there is no inspection lot for this goods movement, the system posts the quantity to blocked stock or does not post the goods receipt.
    If you have created an inspection lot, the system marks the certificate check with the status "In lot". You must confirm the availability of an inspected certificate by the time you make the usage decision.
    after doing the GRN stock is being posted to block stock
    if i do not process the source inspection lot then the stock is posted to quality stock but this does fulfill the requirement of source inspection
    plz suggest soultion
    It's urgent
    Regards
    Ashutosh Shende
    9860681314

    Hello Ashutosh,
    In the material master you have defined certificate type with the customizing setting indicator for  'Enhanced Certificate Processing' active.
    If you set this indicator, extended certificate processing is active for
    this certificate type. You can then manage the inbox for quality        
    certificates independent of the goods receipt.                          
    The electronic inbox of certificates for the purchase order is only     
    possible if this indicator is set.                                                                               
    This means you have to create a certificate in QM (Transaction QC51),   
    before you can update your PO with cert. enclosed.  
    If you do not want the enhanced certificate processing you have change  
    the indicator into inactive.    
    Another problem known here is if you have activated the 05 Inspection type in the material master, that it is not activated in all plants relevant although QM in Procurement is set in all plants.                                        
    I hope that this resolves the described issue.
    Regards,
    Isabelle

  • Source inspection before 365 days of delivery date of purchase order

    Hi Experts,
    Business wants to create source inspection lot well in advance before 365 days of delivery date of purchase order. this lot is required to record results.
    In SAP, transaction code QA51 allows only two digit characters for 'number of days for opening period' so system is not creating inspection lot for more than 99 days delivery date from current date.
    Please advise.

    Hi Patel, I really got interested on this particular issue because we have been using source inspection in our company for a while. After some investigation on ABAP code of report I will share with you my fact findings:
    1) System calculates the start date of source inspection (delivery date from PO - Leadtime from q-info record). For example, in my test case it was 14.08.2015 - 0 days. So field g_datum below will be 14.08.2015:
    2) System then checks if you are running the report in background (highlighted in yellow above). If so then it will check if the start date of inspection (g_datum) falls on opening horizon (g_datum_eroff). The opening horizon is calculated as per formula below (system login date + opening period). As an example: 14.08.2014 + 30 days = 13.09.2014.
    Default opening period (p_eroff) is 30 days:
    3) So all-in-all, when you are running QI07 online you´ll get a yellow traffic light on the long leadtime PO but you will be able to process it (on-line). However if you run the report in background (job scheduling) system will only create inspection lot to the relevant POs if the PO's delivery date falls on the 30 days window based upon the current date.

  • Source inspection - STOP Purchase Order GR

    Hi,
    We have a requirement in quality management in procurement process:
    Requirement:  System should perform inspection before goods receipt is made to the purchase order. Pre-receipt inspection should have three MIC to be inspected. When all the inspection characteristics are OK then system should receive the material to unrestricted. If MIC are not ok system should not let doing GR of purchase order.
    Possible solution: I tried leveraging source inspection functionality to meet above requirement. I created QIR and selected Source inspection = 0101 and check box for Source insp u2013 no GR active.
    Material master is assigned with inspection type 0101 and selected control key with GR for rejection = Goods receipt not allowed, GR control/Batch = u2018Do not create new ILu2019
    When purchase order is created system is letting GR for the purchase order without error. I used QI07 and created an inspection lot for the purchasing document, however before I do UD for the inspection lot system is letting to do GR for purchase order  Or before I create IL for the purchasing document system is allowing to do GR for the purchase order. Which I believe is incorrect.
    Is there a way I can stop doing GR of purchase order if source inspection UD is not Ok. If source inspection UD is rejected then system should not let doing GR of purchase order.
    Please advice...
    Thanks
    Regards
    S

    Just want to check if any recommendations for below issue ?
    Thanks
    S

Maybe you are looking for

  • Problem with Http RFC Scenario

    hi all.........      Am doing an HTTP RFC scenario. The scenario is working fine with all messages in IS, IE and AE being successful. But the problem is the RFC response am getting is not what is expected. When i run the RFC directly with the same in

  • Two questions related to OBIEE 11g setup in Linux

    Hi, 1.Do we need to setup JDK 1.6 and above before installing OBIEE? as per below post OBIEE uses it's own JDK. OBIEE 11g on Windows 7 (64 bit) 2. Do we need to configure DHCP loopback adapter in Linux as well as we do in windows? If Yes how can I do

  • Downloads say FF4 is there, but FF screen says I need to download it

    I've got a macbook and have downloaded FF4 - it says it is saved in my downloads, but my firefox icon at bottom of screen only brings up previous FFversion which keeps telling me about the new one i.e. 4. I am very untechnical, so if I need to do any

  • Nasty GFX card problem, MS-6367 (HELP!!!)

    I'm not really a techie person, so I don't know all the right information.  I have a MS-6367 motherboard, it's in a 2 year old HP Pavilion 701 comp, and runs an AMB processor.  (I think it is 1600+)  Anyways, I recently went through some simple case

  • Application delivery architecture alternatives

    Hi All, For those who might have confronted the problem of dealing with the provisioning of applications across WAN links hosted out of central / single instances data center, far away from the primary user base, would know that provisioning of GbE o