Unity Connections 8.6.2a Single Inbox Problem

We have a Unity Connections Server version 8.6.2a talking to Exchange 2010 SP1.  We have verified Authenications, HTTPS, Certs etc.  If we run a test from the Edit Unified Messaging Screen, we get the following:
Severity                               Issue                               Recommendation                               Details
The validation results for unified messaging service Exchange are the following:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               Service "Exchange": AuthenticationMode=[Basic] [use  HTTPS/validate] Server=[server.internaldomain.com] Type=[Exchange  2007/2010] Username=[domain\UnityUser]
The server domain name can be resolved.
Server server.domain.com can be contacted by pinging.
The service port for calendaring is functioning.
The certificate verification results from SSL is X509_V_OK.
This test does not test all aspects of the configuration of  the service. To complete testing, add a unified messaging account for a  user and test the account using the Test button on the Edit Unified  Messaging Account page.            
However under the user we get:
The validation results for the user unified messaging service  account [email protected] with service Exchange are the  following:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               Service "Exchange": AuthenticationMode=Basic [use  HTTPS/validate] Server=[server.internaldomain.com] Type=[Exchange  2007/2010] Username=[domain\UnityUser]
Failed accessing [email protected] on server.internaldomain.com                                    .                                                                                                                                                                                                           Diagnostic=[] Verb=[] url=[] request=[] response=[]
The system failed to perform a typical calendar operation.                                    Refer to other warnings and errors generated by the tool, and check the Tomcat log file for details.                                                                                                                                                                                                           The system failed while trying to make an API call.          
I'm completely at a loss.          

I get the following when I attempt to run that after install:
C:\Program Files\Cisco\Unified Serviceability\JRtmt>".\jre\bin\java" -Dsun.java2
d.d3d=false -Xbootclasspath/a:.;.\lib\xerces.jar;.\lib\log4j.jar;.\lib\jcchart45
0J.jar;.\lib\collections.jar;.\lib\JbcBeans.jar;.\lib\activation.jar;.\lib\axis.
jar;.\lib\axis-ant.jar;.\lib\commons-discovery.jar;.\lib\commons-io-1.3.2.jar;.\
lib\commons-logging.jar;.\lib\commons-lang-2.1.jar;.\lib\commons-net.jar;.\lib\i
fxjdbc.jar;.\lib\mail.jar;.\lib\maverick-debug-all.jar;.\lib\jaxrpc.jar;.\lib\sa
aj.jar;.\tzupdater.jar;.\lib\jide-common.jar;.\lib\jide-dialogs.jar;.\lib\jide-g
rids.jar;.\lib\wsdl4j.jar;.\lib\javacsv.jar;.\lib\jtds.jar;.\lib\commons-beanuti
ls.jar;.\lib\commons-collections.jar;.\lib\commons-digester.jar;.\lib\commons-el
.jar;.\lib\commons-jexl.jar;.\lib\commons-scxml.jar;.\lib\derby.jar;.\lib\xalan.
jar;.\lib\openssoclientsdk.jar -jar JRtmt.jar
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException
        at com.cisco.ccm.serviceability.rtmt.ui.SystemUtil.getLog4jConf(Unknown
Source)
        at com.cisco.ccm.serviceability.rtmt.ui.JRtmtMain.initTrace(Unknown Sour
ce)
        at com.cisco.ccm.serviceability.rtmt.ui.JRtmtMain.main(Unknown Source)
C:\Program Files\Cisco\Unified Serviceability\JRtmt>

Similar Messages

  • Unity Connection 8.5(x), single inbox, and smartphones

    If the customer sets up the following environment:
    Unity Connection 8.5(x) WITH SECURE MESSAGING
    Single Inbox with Exchange 2010
    Customer has smartphones (blackberry, etc).
    We're trying to figure out if this is set up, will the smart phones be able to play the voicemail message or not?  Based on what I see, I'm thinking they may not, but would love to hear from someone with eyes and ears back in the BU.
    Cliff

    They would not be able to play the message. From the Unified Messaging Guide:
    To play secure Connection voice messages in the Exchange mailbox, users must use Microsoft Outlook and Cisco Unity Connection ViewMail for Microsoft Outlook. Without ViewMail for Outlook installed, users accessing secure voice messages see only text in the body of a decoy message; the text briefly explains secure messages.
    In other words, the Blackberry phones don't have ViewMail and can only see the decoy message.

  • Cisco Unity Connection 8.5 User voicemail password problem

    HI,
    Im having problems with a cisco unity connection and hope someone can help, i have some users that after 2-3 weeks their passwords stop working
    and i need to go and set a new password for them to login to hear their messages. i have set unity for never expire passwords nor lockout on failed attempts, i cant see any difference betweeen the users who have the problem and users who dont, i have impoorted my users using ldap but i am no using ldap authentication.
    Thanks,

    Hi Hector,
    Maybe you are seeing this bug;
    CSCtr43643 Bug Details Bug #5 of 21 | < Previous | Next >
    Authentication rule of users doesn't overule system authentication rule
    Symptom:Authentication rule of users doesn't overrule system authentication rules.Lets say:
    An authentication rule is set where by the password has to expire in 2 days. And one of the user's authentication rule is set to specify "do not expire".
    Then also it gives warning of "Password Expiration".
    Condition :
    Having different rules set under authentication rule(System Settings -> Authentication Rules") and at user level (Select User->Edit->Password Settings).
    Workaround:
    None
    Status
    Fixed             
    Severity
    3 - moderate
    Last Modified
    In Last Year        
    Product
    Cisco Unity Connection         
    Technology
    1st Found-In
    8.5       
    Fixed-In
    8.5(1)ES58
    8.5(1.13033.1)
    8.0(3)ES36
    8.0(3.23039.1)
    Cheers!
    Rob

  • Cisco Unity Connection single inbox and viewmail error

    Unity Connection 8.5.1 single inbox with Exchange 2010 and viewmail 8.5.4.  We arein the process of migrating from Unity 7.0.2 to Unity Connection.
    We are a lawfirm and many of our admins have full access to their attorney's exchange mailbox to manage their messages and voicemails.  With Connection those admins can no longer access voicemails in exchange accounts other than their own even if they have full access.
    A message pops up stating "the requested voice message is no longer available" and only dead air is played whether playback via phone or speakers is selected.  This is a huge issue for our end users.
    Has anyone else experienced this or hav eany suggestions for a work around?
    I have tried assigning the mailbox access delegation role to an end user but this did not grant access via vewmail.
    Thanks
    Liz

    Hi Liz,
    This is expected behavior because VMO has certain dependencies mapped between users and messages, so when a different user tries to access the message, it can't find the mapping which is why you receive that message.  However, VMO 8.6(4) introduced the ability for this exact group mailbox access feature you're after.
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/connection/vmo/release/notes/864cucvmorn.html#wp346504
    Hope that helps,
    Brad

  • Unity Connection 8.5 Email Notification

    We have CUCM 7.1.5 and Unity Connection 8.5.  Single Inbox.
    When receiving a VM, we are getting [email protected]
    I was hoping to get [email protected] .  Is there something I'm missing here?  We have a Mult-Tenant environment.
    Thanks.
    I will add that we are moving from Unity 7 to Unity Connection 8.5.

    Hi Mike,
    Your question was specifically about flexibility with the SMTP domain, which is what I answered.  As far as being able to reply, yes you can reply to voice mail messages just like Unity.  However, it's a tad different.  There may be some extra configuration required on Exchange if your users are not using VMO to reply to these messages.  There was an article written about this exact scenario:
    https://supportforums.cisco.com/community/netpro/collaboration-voice-video/unified-comm-application/blog/2011/07/18/unity-connection-851-single-inbox-unified-messaging-forwardreply-in-outlook-fails-with-ndr
    Hope that helps,
    Brad

  • Cisco Unity Connection 8.5 Single Inbox - Unified Messaging?

    For the Cisco Unity Connection 8.5, to enable Single inbox unified messaging do we need to get additional licensing for this feature?

    Hi Ali,
    LicIMAPSubscribersMax
    Users with IMAP access to voice messages or with single inbox (single inbox available in Connection 8.5 and later only)
    Sets the maximum number of users who can use:
    •A third-party IMAP client to access voice messages.
    •The  unified messaging feature "Synchronize Connection and Exchange  Mailboxes (Single Inbox)" on the Unified Messaging > Unified  Messaging Services page and on the Users > Users > Unified  Messaging Accounts page.
    For single inbox, the total number of users in classes of service for  which single inbox is enabled must not exceed the licensed maximum. This  applies regardless of the number of users in those classes of service  who are configured to use single inbox. In addition, all users who are  configured for single inbox must be in a class of service for which  single inbox is enabled.
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/connection/8x/administration/guide/8xcucsag310.html
    Cheers!
    Rob
    "And if I should fall behind
    Wait for me" - Springsteen

  • Unity Connection 8.5 MWI performance

    I'm trying to get some sort of expectation regarding MWI performance with Unity Connection 8.5 and Unified Inbox with Exchange 2010 SP1.
    Since my Unity 7x system is working fine in regards to MWI and Exchange 2010 SP1, my test Unity Connection 8.5 system is not. I've seen MWI status changes taking as long as 15 minutes but as little as 5 seconds to come to the Unity Connection 8.5 server. I know the issue is in Exchange, but does anyone have some observed performance from this type of integration?

    In my case everything checked out and from all outward appearances should have worked fine.  There was some finger pointing and TAC found several other cases resembling the same thing as I was experiencing.  We upgraded to an engineering special only because it was the only thing newer to upgrade to from what was available online at the time.  It resolved my problem not because it was an ES but I speculate that it just re-initialized some database components.  I suspect sometime during making SMTP domain changes something got messed up and that caused the issue.

  • Unity Connection 8.5 Exchange 2010

    Does the exchange server need to be in the same location as the Unity Connection 8.5 server for single inbox to work?

    In the single inbox design guide here....
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/docs/voice_ip_comm/connection/8x/design/guide/8xcucdg032.html
    Calculating the Number of Connections for a Connection Cluster
    If both Connection servers in a cluster are in the same location, so they have the same latency when synchronizing with Exchange, you can calculate the number of connections the same way you do for one Connection server.
    If one server in a cluster is collocated with the Exchange servers and the other is in a remote location:
    •Install the publisher server in the location with the Exchange servers. The publisher server should always be the primary server unless the server is offline for maintenance or is unavailable for some other reason.
    Also here in this guide....
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/docs/voice_ip_comm/connection/8x/requirements/8xcucsysreqs.html#wp459928
    Unified Messaging Requirements: Synchronizing Connection and Exchange Mailboxes (Single Inbox) (Connection 8.5 and Later Only)
    Revised February 22, 2011
    •Cisco Unity Connection integrated with a supported version of Microsoft Exchange Server:
    –Exchange Server 2010 with Update Rollup 3 or later (All editions are supported.)
    –Exchange Server 2010 with Service Pack 1 (All editions are supported.)
    –Exchange Server 2007 with Service Pack 2 or later (All editions are supported.)
    To synchronize Connection and Exchange 2007 mailboxes, you must install Connection 8.5(1) Service Update 1 (SU1), which is available on the Voice and Unified Communications Downloads page at http://tools.cisco.com/support/downloads/pub/Redirect.x?mdfid=278875240.
    In the tree control on the Downloads page, expand Voice and Unified Communications > Unified Communications Applications > Voice Mail and Unified Messaging > Cisco Unity Connection > Cisco Unity Connection Version 8.5. On the Select a Release page, select SU1, and the download buttons appear on the right side of the page.
    –Exchange Server 2003 with Service Pack 2 (All editions are supported.)
    To synchronize Connection and Exchange 2003 mailboxes, you must install Connection 8.5(1) Service Update 1 (SU1). For download instructions, see the previous bullet.
    Microsoft Business Productivity Online Suite is not supported.
    •Exchange servers and Active Directory domain controllers/global catalog servers (DC/GCs) can be installed in any hardware virtualization environment supported by Microsoft. (Cisco does not provide technical support for message-store servers or for DC/GCs.)
    •The Microsoft Exchange message store can be stored in any storage area network configuration supported by Microsoft. (Cisco does not provide technical support for message-store servers.)
    •Exchange clusters are supported.
    •To access Exchange servers in more than one forest, you must create at least one unified messaging service for each forest. Connection supports a maximum of 20 unified messaging services per Connection server.
    •Depending on the number of voice messaging ports on each Connection server, the path of connectivity must have the following guaranteed bandwidth with no steady-state congestion:
    –For 50 voice messaging ports on each server—7 Mbps
    –For 100 voice messaging ports on each server—14 Mbps
    –For 150 voice messaging ports on each server—21 Mbps
    –For 200 voice messaging ports on each server—28 Mbps
    –For 250 voice messaging ports on each server—35 Mbps
    The bandwidth numbers above are intended as guidelines to ensure proper operation of mailbox synchronization. For information on bandwidth requirements for Connection clusters, see the "Requirements for a Cisco Unity Connection 8.x Cluster" section. Additional conditions such as network congestion, CPU utilization, and message size may contribute to lower throughput than expected. Call-control and call-quality requirements are in addition to the guidelines above and should be calculated by using the bandwidth recommendations in the applicable Cisco Unified Communications SRND at http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/solutions/ns340/ns414/ns742/ns818/landing_uc_mgr.html.
    •The default Connection configuration is sufficient for a maximum of 2000 users and 80 milliseconds of round-trip latency between Connection and Exchange servers. For more than 2000 users and/or more than 80 milliseconds of latency, you can change the default configuration. For more information, see the " Latency" section in the "Single Inbox in Cisco Unity Connection 8.5 and Later" chapter of the Design Guide for Cisco Unity Connection Release 8.x. at http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/docs/voice_ip_comm/connection/8x/design/guide/8xcucdgx.html.
    •Users must be assigned to a class of service that is enabled for using single inbox.
    •For each user configured for single inbox, an email client that is configured to access the user's Exchange mailbox. For full single-inbox functionality, we recommend that you use Microsoft Outlook and install Cisco ViewMail for Microsoft Outlook. ViewMail for Outlook is required to:
    –Review secure Connection voice messages by using Outlook.
    –Compose, reply to, or forward synchronized voice messages by using Outlook.
    Other email clients can be used to access Connection voice messages in Exchange, but users will not have the functionality provided by ViewMail for Outlook.
    For information on Connection support for Outlook, see the "Requirements for Accessing Voice Messages by Using Cisco ViewMail for Microsoft Outlook 8.5 and Later" section.
    •For users who are configured for single inbox and SpeechView transcriptions, the message in Exchange is not updated with the transcribed text. You can configure Connection to send a notification message that contains the transcription.
    •When message expiration and single inbox are configured, the .wav file is not deleted from the message in Exchange. Voice messages in Connection are still removed from user mailboxes and are replaced with a recording that tells the user "This message is expired."
    Specifically teh bandwidth requirements. Typically it's always best to have Exchange as close as possible to the CUC servers for performance to be ideal but this should give you some guidelines.
    Tray

  • Unity Connection 8.5.1ES16.11900-16 upgrade for Single Inbox with Exchange 2007 ?

    Hello friends,
    I'm currentely running Unity Connection 8.5.1ES16.11900-16.
    I would like to use the single inbox feature with Exchange 2007.
    It is in the documentation that we need at least Unity Connection 8.5(1) Service Update 1 (UCSInstall_UCOS_8.5.1.11900-21.sgn.iso).
    I downloaded, checked MD5 but when searching on the FTP directory it won't accept it (No valid upgrade options were found). Is this a supported upgrade?
    Same happens with the localization file in Portuguese that i need to install: uc-locale-pt_PT-8.5.1.1-16.cop.sng ...
    Please can you give me some hints about what I may be doing wrong?
    Thank you very much and warm regards,
    met

    Hi Met,
    Hope all is well
    I think you are hitting this caveat. Although the numbers don't match exactly I'm
    pretty sure you will need to wait for an 8.5.1.12xxx.x ES
    If the Connection server is running an engineering special with a full Cisco Unified Communications
    Operating System version number between 8.5.1.11001-x and 8.5.1.11899-x, do not upgrade the server
    to Connection 8.5(1) SU 1 because the upgrade will fail. Instead, upgrade the server with an ES released
    after 8.5(1) SU 1 that has a full Unified Communications OS version number of 8.5.1.12xxx.x or later
    to get the SU 1 functionality.
    http://www.cisco.com/web/software/282074295/44508/851su1cucrm.pdf
    Cheers!
    Rob

  • Single Inbox on Unity Connection 8.5 and Exchange 2003 SP2

    Hi,
    We have Unity Connection 8.5 (with SU2) and Exchange 2003 SP2
    We want to setup the Single Inbox feature that works well with Exchange 2007 and 2010, but my customer is running Exchange 2003 SP2.
    We met all of the requirements outlined in: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/connection/8x/requirements/8xcucsysreqs.html#wp459928
    I configure a new "Unified Messaging Services" profile for Exchange using Exchange 2003 and enabled for Single Inbox.  When I run "Test" it displays the following errors (other validation is successfully)
    The service port for IMAP is not functioning.      
    The system failed to connect to the server with a socket connection through port beatles.clubone.com:993. The error is error:0200206F:system library:connect:Connection refused. Refer to the tomcat log file for more details. If you are using secure connection, confirm that SSL is enabled on the server.
    Why is it trying to connect using IMAP, that wasn't the case when I used for Exchange 2007 or 2010 when IMAP was not enabled.
    Is there something else I'm missing for configuration with Unity Connection to support Single Inbox with Exchange 2003 SP2?
    Thank you!
    -rya

    Hi Rya,
    I just wanted to add my +5 vote for this great catch by Aaron (nice work "A")
    If you are going to upgrade to Unity Connection 8.6
    Check out this great doc from Saurabh for the refresh upgrade notes to 8.6.
    https://supportforums.cisco.com/community/netpro/collaboration-voice-video/unified-comm-application/blog/2011/08/11/checklist-before-upgrading-to-unity-connection-86
    Cheers!
    Rob
    "Show a little faith, there's magic in the night" - Springsteen

  • Unity Connection 8.5 single inbox with Exchange 2003 - Access denied

    Hi,
    I'm using CUCMBE 8.5.1.12900-7 Unrestricted. i'm following Unified Messaging Guide for Cisco Unity Connection Release 8.5 and Later for configuring single inbox. I have successfully setup and tested unified messaging service when I subscribe this service to a particular user and test it, I get following error:
    Issue: Failed accessing [email protected] on 192.168.0.10
    Recommendations: Some possible reasons for 401: Incorrect service account name or password. Service account password expired. Proper permissions not granted to service account. Exchange mailbox uninitialized.
    Details: HTTP status=[401 Unauthorized] diagnostic=[Bad response from server, HTTP code returned: 401] url=[http://192.168.0.10/exchange/
    [email protected]] request=[<?xml version="1.0"?> <D:propfind xmlns:D="DAV:" xmlns:fh="urn:schemas:httpmail:" xmlns:h="http://schemas.microsoft.com/repl/"> <D:prop> <fh:msgfolderroot/> </D:prop> </D:propfind> ] response=[<html><head><title>Error</title></head><body>Error: Access is Denied.</body></html>]
    I have verified above mentioned recommendations but no such issue exists. Any ideas?

    Hi Muhammad,
    I am having exactly the same issue in configuring sinlgle inbox with unity connection 8.6 and exchange 2003. I have checked everything but no result. Could you please help in configuring?
    Thanks
    The validation results for the  user unified messaging service account [email protected] with service  E2K302 are the following:
    Service "E2K302":  AuthenticationMode=NTLM [use HTTP] Server=[E2K3-02.chelloit1.local]  Type=[Exchange 2003] Username=[chelloit1.local\agokharu]
    Failed accessing  [email protected] on E2K3-02.chelloit1.local
    Some possible reasons for 401:  Incorrect service account name or password. Service account password expired.  Proper permissions not granted to service account. Exchange mailbox  uninitialized.
    HTTP status=[401 Unauthorized]  diagnostic=[Bad response from server, HTTP code returned: 401]  url=[http://E2K3-02.chelloit1.local/exchange/[email protected]]  request=[<?xml version="1.0"?> http://schemas.microsoft.com/repl/">   ]  response=[ErrorError:  Access is Denied.]

  • Cisco Unity Connection Single inbox with Exchange 2010

    I have a new installation of Unity Connection 8.6.2 using single inbox with an Exchange 2010 cluster frontended by a Netscaler load balancer.Functionality that does not work is when a new message comes into outlook and the message is read or deleted it does not update the status on the phone- IE turn off the MWI or if the message is deleted it is still a new message in Unity. If you click reset in the user unified message account, the status gets updated.
    TAC says its a blocked port on Exchange TCP 7080 but that is open.

      I followed this document :
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/connection/8x/unified_messaging/guide/85xcucumg020.html
    but when i try to integrate CUC with exchange 2010 , i didn't find is clear enough
    do you have Step by Step more clear than that link becouse my lab very close to your case.
    Regards

  • Cisco support for Single Inbox Feature in Exchange 2003 for Unity Connection 8.5

    Hi There,
    Does Cisco support a Unity Connection 8.5 solution/design with the Single Inbox Feature (for Unified Messaging) configured with Exchange 2003, or does it support the Single Inbox feature on Exchange 2010 only?
    Thanks

    Thanks Anthony - I just found an updated doco that confirms that.

  • Single Inbox Issue with Unity Connection 8.5 and Exchange 2003

    Hello Unity Gurus,
    I recently upgraded our Unity server to Unity Conenction 8.5. We are pressing hard to have unified messaging. However theres always problems it seems.
    We have several 2003 exchange servers, two of the exchange servers split up our organization and one has half of the users mailboxes and the other server has the remaining half. So far the only way that I can get Unified messaging is if I create two separate Unified Messaging Services one for one half, the other for the other half.
    This becomes a problem since now when I create the Unified Message account I have to know what server the user is on and the problem being is that I have 700 voicemail users ill have to look up. Not only that but, if our employees move from one site to the next and if the mailbox gets moved then I imagine most likely break unified messaging for that account.
    I've read the install guide for Unity connection Unified Messaging and I understand that the second option is to have Connection to search for Exchange servers via Active Directory however, when I set that up and test it via unified messaging services I get an error " searching network...failed to locate domain controller via DNS. Failed to locate an exchange 2003 server."
    DNS seems to work if I create single Unified Messaging Service and use the host name that way.
    Anyone have any thoughts or found a work around to this issue?
    Thanks,
    Dan

    We have 41 exchange UM services configured in Unity Connection on 10 clusters, each one to the 2003 exchange servers.  This is the only way it will work for us, as e2k3 can not search for and find other exchange services.  For 2010, it is able to search by AD domain and site name, and we only have one connector configured on each server to the e2k10 environment.  I believe this is the way it works, and is difficult to manage but works.  Just my two cents.

  • Unity Connection 8.5 Single Inbox Maximum File Size

    Hi,
    I have a customer who is using Live Record with Single Inbox & quite commonly the calls they are recording are going for upto an hour. This is obviously resulting in large voicemail sizes.
    They are finding that long recordings (ie 20 minutes) are not being sent to their Outlook account. Is this limited in the settings somewhere or is there a maximum that anyone knows of? The Exchange Admin assures me that they should be able to receive upto 50MB emails which is more than enough.
    Cheers
    Russell

    Stanley,
    Exchange was the issue. Fix was found by Seppe in TAC - worked with him on a couple of occasions and he is one of the best. His email is below:
    Changed the following settings in exchange server to receive 50 MB attachment:
    1.        Edit
    C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V14\ClientAccess\Owa\web.config and update the maxRequestLength value to 51200
    2.        Open a command prompt and execute the following commands:
    cd %windir%\system32\inetsrv
    appcmd set config "Default Web Site/ews" -section:requestFiltering -requestLimits.maxAllowedContentLength:51200000
    appcmd set config "Default Web Site/owa" -section:requestFiltering -requestLimits.maxAllowedContentLength:51200000
    3.        Edit
    C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V14\ClientAccess\exchweb\ews\web.config and  change the  maxReceivedMessageSize value to 51200000 underneath the
    4.        Restart IIS service to apply the change
    Recommending to do this off-hours and take a backup of configuration files before doing any change.

Maybe you are looking for

  • DVDplayBD wont play blu-ray

    Here is what I get when I try to play a blu-ray disc. The computer came with a blu-ray player so it should accept it. The image you see below starts as a TOO big for the screen to show the blu-ray disc is NOT protected. Thanks all

  • A problem about table?

    I can connect to the oracle server, but I cannot list the tables or views ... Sometimes, I can use 'Select'. thanks.

  • Is there a consensus on a IE fix?

    It appears to me that the problem with iWeb 08 and Internet Explorer is a fairly common problem; but, I haven't been able to find a solution that works. Has there been a consensus reached on the best method for solving the problem. Obviously I wish I

  • Regarding Role Authorisation and Obejcts

    Hello Experts, I have requirement from the basis team they want to know the object names for the particular transaction like MMBE and also they have request that they want to restrict to view the stock for plant 1000 for particular user, so they need

  • AirPort problem after installing Security Update 2007-007

    Help! I installed the security update 2007-007 on my Mac mini os x and now my AirPort is not detecting any signal. Should I backup the system and then reboot? I'm not really sure what to do. I have tried almost everything I can imagine. I checked thr